Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 22, Issue 2, pp 117–185 | Cite as

Towards a Variable-Free Semantics

  • Pauline Jacobson


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bach, E.: 1979, ‘Control in Montague Grammar’, Linguistic Inquiry 10, 515–531.Google Scholar
  2. Bach, E. and B. Partee: 1980, ‘Anaphora and Semantic Structure’, in K. J. Kreiman and A. E. Ojeda (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pronouns and Anaphora, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Bittner, M.: 1998, ‘Cross-Linguistic Semantics for Questions’, Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 1–82.Google Scholar
  4. Chierchia, G.: 1988, ‘Aspects of a Categorial Theory of Binding’, in R. Oehrle, E. Bach and D. Wheeler (eds.), Categorial Grammar and Natural Language Structures. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Chierchia, G.: 1990, ‘Anaphora and Attitudes De Se’, in R. Bartsch et al. (eds.), Language in Action, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  6. Chierchia, G.: 1991, ‘Functional WH and Weak Crossover’, in D. Bates (ed.), Proceedings of WCCFL 10. CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  7. Chierchia, G.: 1993, ‘Questions with Quantifiers’, Natural Language Semantics 1, 181–234.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, R.: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Curry, H. and R. Feys: 1958, Combinatory Logic, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  10. Dahl, Ö.: 1981, Paper presented at the Stanford Sloan Workshop on Non-Transformational Grammars, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  11. Dayal, V.: 1996, Locality in WH Quantification, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  12. Dowty, D.: 1982, ‘Grammatical Relations and Montague Grammar’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Dowty, D.: 1987. ‘Type Raising, Functional Composition, and Non-Constituent Conjunction’, in R. Oehrle, E. Bach, and D. Wheeler (eds.), Categorial Grammars and Natural Language Structures, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 153–198.Google Scholar
  14. Dowty, D.: 1992, ‘“Variable-Free” Syntax, Variable-Binding Syntax, The Natural Deduction Lambek Calculus, and the Crossover Constraint’, in Proceedings of the 11th Meeting of the West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  15. Engdahl, E.: 1986, Constituent Questions, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Frazier, L.: 1985, ‘Syntactic Complexity’, in D. Dowty, L. Karttunen, and A. Zwicky (eds.), Natural Language Parsing, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  17. Frazier, L. and J. D. Fodor: 1978, ‘The Sausage Machine: A New Two-Stage Parsing Model’, Cognition 6, 291–325.Google Scholar
  18. Gawron, M. and S. Peters: 1990, Anaphora and Quantification in Situation Semantics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  19. Gazdar, G.: 1980, ‘A Cross-Categorial Semantics for Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 3, 407–409.Google Scholar
  20. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. K. Pullum, and I. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  21. Geach, P.: 1972a, ‘A Program for Syntax’, in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  22. Geach P.: 1972b, Logic Matters, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  23. Ginzburg, J.: 1992, Questions, Queries and Facts: A Semantics and Pragmatics for Interrogatives, Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford.Google Scholar
  24. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1983, ‘Interrogative Quantifiers and Skolem Functions’, in K. Ehlich and H. van Riemsdijk (eds.), Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Tilburg Studies in Language and Literature 4, Tilburg University, Tilburg.Google Scholar
  25. Harper, M.: 1990, The Representation of Noun Phrases in Logical Form, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Brown University, Technical Report: CS–89–46.Google Scholar
  26. Heim, I.: 1997, ‘Semantic Types for Syntactic Categories: Evidence from Ellipsis’, Proceedings from the Seventh Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, Cornell.Google Scholar
  27. Hepple, M.: 1990, The Grammar and Processing of Order and Dependency: A Categorial Approach, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  28. Higginbotham, J.: 1992, ‘Reference and Control’, in R. Larson et al. (eds.), Control and Grammatical Theory, Kluwer, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  29. Höhle, T.: 1990, ‘On Reconstruction and Coordination’, ms., University of Tubingen.Google Scholar
  30. Jacobson, P.: 1977, The Syntax of Crossing Coreference Sentences, Ph.D. Dissertation, UC Berkeley. (published by Garland, Inc., 1981).Google Scholar
  31. Jacobson, P.: 1989, A(nother) Categorical Grammar Account of Extraction’, Paper presented at the Conference on Categorical Grammar, LSA Summer Institute, Tucson, Arizona.Google Scholar
  32. Jacobson, P.: 1992a, ‘Bach-Peters Sentences in a Variable-Free Semantics’, in P. Dekker and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam ILLC, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  33. Jacobson, P.: 1992b, ‘Antecedent Contained Deletion in a Variable-Free Semantics’, in C. Barker and D. Dowty (eds.), Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Ohio State University, Columbus.Google Scholar
  34. Jacobson, P.: 1994a, ‘i-within-i Effects in a Variable-Free Semantics and a Categorial Syntax’, in P. Dekker et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam ILLC, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  35. Jacobson, P.: 1994b, ‘On Copular Connectivity’, in Proceedings of the Fourth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Cornell Working Papers, Cornell.Google Scholar
  36. Jacobson, P.: 1995, ‘On the Quantificational Force of Free Relatives in English’, in E. Bach, E. Jelinek, A. Kratzer, and P. Partee (eds.), Quantification in Natural Language, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  37. Jacobson, P.: 1996a, ‘The Locality of Interpretation: The Case of Binding and Coordination’, in Proceedings of the Sixth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, Cornell.Google Scholar
  38. Jacobson, P.: 1996b, ‘Apparent Exceptions to Weak Crossover in a Variable-Free Semantics’, paper presented at the First Paris Conference on (Non-Lexical) Semantics, Paris 7, Jussieu, 1996.Google Scholar
  39. Jacobson, P.: 1998a, ‘Paycheck pronouns and Variable-Free Semantics: Evidence from Bach-Peters' Sentences’, ms. Brown University.Google Scholar
  40. Jacobson, P.: 1998b, ‘ACD and Pied-Piping: Evidence for a Variable-Free Semantics’, to appear in Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, Cornell Working Papers in Linguistics, Cornell.Google Scholar
  41. Keenan, E. and L. Faltz: 1985, Boolean Semantics for Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  42. Kennedy, C.: 1994, ‘Argument Contained Ellipsis’, ms., Syntax Research Center, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  43. Lakoff, G.: 1972, ‘On Generative Semantics’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jacobovits (eds.), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  44. Lakoff, G.: 1986, ‘Frame Semantic Control of the Coordinate Structure Constraint’, in A. Farkley et al. (eds.), Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Chicago Linguistics Society, Chicago.Google Scholar
  45. Lahiri, U.: 1991, Embedded Interrogatives and Predicates that Embed Them, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
  46. Landman, F. and I. Moerdijk: 1983, ‘Compositionality and the Analysis of Anaphora’, Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 89–114.Google Scholar
  47. Lasnik, H. and T. Stowell: 1991, ‘Weakest Crossover’, Linguistic Inquiry 22, 687–720.Google Scholar
  48. Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitudes De Dicto and De Se’, The Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.Google Scholar
  49. Link, G.: 1983, ‘The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mas Terms: A Lattice-theoretical Approach’, in R. Bauele, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, de Gruyter, Berlin/New York.Google Scholar
  50. Maling, J. and A. Zaenen: 1982, ‘A Phrase Structure Account of Scandinavian Extraction Phenomena’, in P. Jacobson and G. K. Pullum (eds.), The Nature of Syntactic Representation, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  51. May, Robert: 1977, The Grammar of Quantification, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  52. May, Robert: 1985, Logical Form: Its Structure and Derivation, MIT Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  53. Mitchell, J.: 1986, The Formal Semantics of Point of View, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts, University of Massachusetts GLSA Publication, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  54. Montague, R.: 1974, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in R. Thomason (ed.), Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  55. McCawley, J.: 1971, ‘Where do Noun Phrases Come From?’, in R. Jacobs and P. Rosenbaum (eds.), Readings in English Transformational Grammar, Ginn & Co., Waltham.Google Scholar
  56. Oehrle, R.: 1990, ‘Categorial Frameworks, Coordination, and Extraction’, in A. Halpern (ed.), Proceedings of the Ninth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  57. Partee, B.: 1985, ‘Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous Be’, in S. Berman, J. W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 16, GLSA Publication, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  58. Partee, B.: 1987, ‘Noun Phrase Interpretation and Type-Shifting Principles’, in J. Groenendijk, D. de Johngh, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  59. Partee, B.: 1991, ‘Anaphoric and Deictic Pieces of Meaning”, paper presented at the 8th Amsterdam Colloquium, Amsterdam: ITLI.Google Scholar
  60. Partee, B. and E. Bach: 1981, ‘Quantification, Pronouns, and VP Anaphora’, in J. Groenendijk, T. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language: Proceedings of the Third Amsterdam Colloquium, Mathematisch Centrum, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  61. Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bauerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and the Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 362–383.Google Scholar
  62. Pollard, C. and I. Sag: 1994, Head Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press and Stanfordm CSLI Publications, Chicago.Google Scholar
  63. Quine, W. V.: 1966, ‘Variables Explained Away’, in W. V. Quine, Selected Logic Papers, Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  64. Reinhart, T.: 1983, Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, Croom Helm, London.Google Scholar
  65. Reinhart, T.: 1990, ‘Self Representation’, paper presented at the Princeton Conference on Anaphora, Princeton.Google Scholar
  66. Sag, I.: 1976, Deletion and Logical Form, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT. (Distributed by the Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington).Google Scholar
  67. Sharvit, Yael: 1997, The Syntax and Semantics of Functional Relative Clauses, Ph.D. Dissertation, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
  68. Stechow, A. von: 1990, ‘Layered Traces’, paper presented at the Conference on Logic and Language, Revfülöp, Hungary.Google Scholar
  69. Steedman, M. (1987). “Combinatory Grammars and Parasitic Gaps”, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5, 403–440.Google Scholar
  70. Steedman, M.: (1990), ‘Gapping as Constituent Coordination’, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 207–263.Google Scholar
  71. Szabolcsi, A.: 1987, ‘Bound Variables in Syntax: Are There Any?’, in J. Groenendijk et al. (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Amsterdam Colloquium, University of Amsterdam ITLI, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  72. Szabolcsi, A.: 1992, ‘Combinatory Categorial Grammar and Projection from the Lexicon’, in I. Sag and A. Szabolcsi (eds.), Lexical Matters, CSLI Publications, Stanford.Google Scholar
  73. Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 8.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pauline Jacobson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Cognitive Linguistic SciencesBrown UniversityProvidenceU.S.A

Personalised recommendations