Advertisement

Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 1–22 | Cite as

Effects of Outcome Expectancies and Personality on Young Adults' Illicit Drug Use, Heavy Drinking, and Risky Sexual Behavior

  • Elizabeth C. Katz
  • Kim Fromme
  • Elizabeth J. D'Amico
Article

Abstract

To explain risk-taking behavior, personality theorists typically focus on biologically based predispositions, whereas cognitive psychologists often focus on beliefs and environmental contingencies. The current longitudinal study examined both personality traits and outcome expectancies as explanations for heavy drinking, drug use, and unsafe sexual behavior among 162 college students. Results indicated that (1) personality and past experience contribute to outcome expectancies, (2) outcome expectancies and personality independently predict substance use at 6-month follow-up, and (3) only past experience predicts subsequent risky sexual behavior. The approach taken in this research offers a bridge between personality theorists and cognitive psychologists who seek to understand why people endanger their lives in pursuit of risky activities.

outcome expectancies personality risk taking substance use unsafe sex 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Abler, R. M., & Sedlacek, W. E. (1989). Freshmen sexual attitudes and behaviors over a 15 year period. Journal of College Student Development, 30, 201-209.Google Scholar
  2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1997). Amos user's guide: Version 3.6. Chicago: Smallwaters Corporation.Google Scholar
  3. Baron, R. M., & Kenney, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.Google Scholar
  4. Benthin, A., Slovic, P., & Severson, H. (1993). A psychometric study of adolescent risk perception. Journal of Adolescence, 16, 153-168.Google Scholar
  5. Berkowitz, A. D., & Perkins, H. W. (1986). Problem drinking among college students: A review of recent research. Journal of American College Health, 35, 21-28.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, S. A., Goldman, M. S., Inn, A., & Anderson, L. R. (1980). Expectations of reinforcement from alcohol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 48, 419-426.Google Scholar
  7. Castro, F. G., Maddahian, E., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1987). A multivariate model of the determinants of cigarette smoking among adolescents. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 28, 273-289.Google Scholar
  8. Cavendish, J. M. (1991). From data to program decisions: Developing a student assistance program. Journal of College Student Health, 39, 191-193.Google Scholar
  9. Cherpitel, C. J. (1993). Alcohol, injury, and risk-taking behavior: Data from a national sample. Annual Meeting of the American Public Health Association (1992, Washington, D.C.). Alcoholism: Clinical and Experimental Research, 17, 762-766.Google Scholar
  10. Cooper, M. L., Wood, P., & Orcutt, H. K. (1996, August). Covariation among adolescent problem behaviors: What does it mean? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  11. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Four ways five factors are basic. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 653-665.Google Scholar
  12. Donovan, J. E., & Jessor, R. (1985). Structure of problem behavior in adolescence and young adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 890-904.Google Scholar
  13. Earleywine, M., & Finn, P. R. (1991). Sensation seeking explains the relation between behavioral disinhibition and alcohol consumption. Addictive Behaviors, 16, 123-128.Google Scholar
  14. Forney, M. A., Ripley, W. K., & Forney, P. D. (1988). A profile and prediction study of problem drinking among first-year medical students. International Journal of the Addictions, 23, 767-779.Google Scholar
  15. Friend, K. E., & Koushki, P. A. (1984). Student substance use: Stability and change across college years. International Journal of the Addictions, 19, 571-575.Google Scholar
  16. Fromme, K., Katz, E., & Rivet, K. (1997). Outcome expectancies and risk-taking behavior. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 21, 421-442.Google Scholar
  17. Fromme, K., Stroot, E., & Kaplan, D. (1993). The Comprehensive Effects of Alcohol questionnaire: Development and psychometric evaluation of a new expectancy questionnaire. Psychological Assessment, 5, 19-26.Google Scholar
  18. Gerrard, M., Gibbons, F. X., Benthin, A. C., & Hessling, R. M. (1996). A longitudinal study of the reciprocal nature of risk behaviors and cognition in adolescents: What you do shapes what you think, and vice versa. Health Psychology, 15, 344-354.Google Scholar
  19. Gilbert, M. A., Bauman, K. E., & Udry, R. (1986). A panel study of subjective expected utility for adolescent sexual behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 745-756.Google Scholar
  20. Goldman, M. S., Brown, S. A., & Christiansen, B. A. (1987). Expectancy theory: Thinking about drinking. In H. T. Blane & K. E. Leonard (Eds.), Psychological theories of drinking and alcoholism (pp. 181-226). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  21. Gray, J. A. (1991). Neural systems, emotion, and personality. In J. Madden IV (Ed.), Neurobiology of learning: Emotion and affect (pp. 273-306). New York: Raven Press.Google Scholar
  22. Henderson, M. J., Goldman, M. S., Coovert, M. D., & Carnevalla, N. (1994). Covariance structure models of expectancy. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 55, 315-326.Google Scholar
  23. Horvath, P. M., & Zuckerman, M. (1993). Sensation seeking, risk appraisals, and risky behaviors. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 41-52.Google Scholar
  24. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1995). Evaluating model fit. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  25. Jessor, R., & Jessor, S. L. (1977). Problem behavior and psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of youth. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  26. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (1996). The Monitoring the Future Study, 1975-1994: Vol. II. College students and young adults. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.Google Scholar
  27. Joreskog, K., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS language. Chicago: Scientific Software International.Google Scholar
  28. Lavery, B., Siegel, A. W., Cousins, J. H., & Rubovits, D. S. (1993). Adolescent risk-taking: An analysis of problem behaviors in problem children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 55, 277-294.Google Scholar
  29. Leigh, B. C., & Stall, R. (1993). Substance use and risky sexual behavior for exposure to HIV. American Psychologist, 48, 1035-1045.Google Scholar
  30. Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Latent variable models: An introduction to factor, path and structural analysis (2nd ed). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  31. McGee, L., & Newcomb, M. D. (1992). General deviance syndrome: Hierarchical evaluations at four ages from early adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 60, 766-776.Google Scholar
  32. Mulaik, S. A., James, L. R., Van Alstine, J., Bennett, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C. D. (1989). Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-445.Google Scholar
  33. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1989). Applied linear regression models (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Irwin.Google Scholar
  34. Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1989). Consequences of adolescent drug use: Impact in the lives of young adults. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rothbart, M. K., Derryberry, D., & Posner, M. I. (1994). A psychobiological approach to the development of temperament. In J. E. Bates & T. D. Wachs (Eds.), Temperament: Individual differences at the interface of biology and behavior (pp. 83-116). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  36. Schafer, J., & Brown, S. A. (1991). Marijuana and cocaine effect expectancies and drug use patterns. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 558-565.Google Scholar
  37. Smith, G. T., Goldman, M. S., Greenbaum, P. E., & Christiansen, B. A. (1995). Expectancy for social facilitation from drinking: The divergent paths of high-expectancy and low-expectancy adolescents. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 32-40.Google Scholar
  38. Stacy, A. W., Newcomb, M. D., & Bentler, P. M. (1991). Personality, problem drinking, and drunk driving: Mediating, moderating and direct-effect models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 795-811.Google Scholar
  39. Webb, J. A., Baer, P. E., Francis, D. J., & Caid, C. D. (1993). Relationship among social and intrapersonal risk, alcohol expectancies, and alcohol usage among early adolescents. Addictive Behaviors, 18, 127-134.Google Scholar
  40. White, H. R., & Johnson, V. (1988). Risk-taking as a predictor of adolescent sexual activity and use of contraception. Journal of Adolescent Research, 3, 317-331.Google Scholar
  41. Wilson, M. D., & Joffe, A. (1995). Adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 1657-1659.Google Scholar
  42. Zuckerman, M. (1979). Sensation seeking: Beyond the optimal level of arousal. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  43. Zuckerman, M. (1984). Sensation seeking: A comparative approach to a human trait. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7, 413-471.Google Scholar
  44. Zuckerman, M. (1994). Behavioral expressions of biosocial bases of sensation seeking. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., Joireman, J., Teta, P., & Kraft, M. (1993). A comparison of three structural models for personality: The Big Three, the Big Five, and the Alternative Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 757-768.Google Scholar
  46. Zuckerman, M., Neary, R. S., & Brustman, B. A. (1970). Sensation seeking-scale correlates in experience (smoking, drugs, alcohol, “hallucinations,” and sex) and preferences for complexity (designs). Proceedings of the Seventy-Eighth Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association (pp. 317-318). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elizabeth C. Katz
    • 1
  • Kim Fromme
    • 1
  • Elizabeth J. D'Amico
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe University of Texas at AustinAustin

Personalised recommendations