Climatic Change

, Volume 42, Issue 2, pp 413–438 | Cite as

Nine Fallacies of Floods

  • Roger A. PielkeJr.
Article

Abstract

A number of important misconceptions or fallacies stand in the way of a better understanding of the nation's flood problem. The fallacies are not universal, with many flood experts, decision makers, and sectors of the public escaping their seductive logic. But enough people do fall prey to these fallacies of floods so as to create obstacles to improved utilization of the lessons of experience. This paper uses three of these lessons to organize presentation of the nine fallacies:

We know the wrong things about the nature of the problem.

Fallacy 1: Flood frequencies are well understood.

Fallacy 2: Damaging flooding in recent years is unprecedented because of ‘global warming’.

Fallacy 3: Levees ‘prevent’ damages.

Fallacy 4: Flood forecasts are universally available.

We don't know enough about why and with what intensity we should act.

Fallacy 5: Societal vulnerability to floods is well understood.

Fallacy 6: Data on flood casualties is a proxy for flood risk.

Fallacy 7: Data on flood damages is a proxy for flood risk.

We know enough about what might be done. Fallacy 8: Knowledge leads to action.

Fallacy 9: The U.S. flood problem can be addressed without Federal leadership and support.

The purpose of raising the fallacies in this paper is to contribute to a systematic definition of the nation's flood problem.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alexander, D.: 1993, Natural Disasters, Chapman and Hall, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. B.: 1995, ‘Vulnerability to Disaster and Sustainable Development: A General Framework for Assessing Vulnerability’, in Munasinghe, M. and Clarke, C. (eds.), Disaster Prevention for Sustainable Development: Economic and Policy Issues, IDNDR and The World Bank, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  3. Belt, Jr., C. B.: 1975, ‘The 1973 Flood and Man's Constriction of the Mississippi River’, Science 189, 681-684.Google Scholar
  4. Bhowmik, N. G., Buck, A. G., Changnon, S. A., Dalton, R. H., Durgunoglu, A., Demissie, M., Juhl, A. R., Knapp, H. V., Kunkel, K. E., McConkey, S. A., Scott, R. W., Singh, K. P., Soong, T. D., Sparks, R. E., Visocky, A. P., Vonnahme, D. R., and Wendland, W. M.: 1994, The 1993 Flood on the Mississippi River in Illinois, Illinois State Water Survey, Miscellaneous Publication 151, Champaign, IL.Google Scholar
  5. Bobée, B. and Rasmussen, P. F.: 1995, Recent Advances in Flood Frequency Analysis, U.S. National Report to the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1991–1994, pp. 1111-1116.Google Scholar
  6. Bohle, H. G., Downing, T. E., and Watts, M. J.: 1994, ‘Climate Change and Social Vulnerability’, Global Environ. Change 4, 37-48.Google Scholar
  7. Brunner, R. D.: 1996, ‘Policy and Global Change Research’, Clim. Change 32, 121-147.Google Scholar
  8. BTFFDR (Bipartisan Task Force on Funding Disaster Relief): 1995, Federal Disaster Assistance, U.S. Senate, p. 104-4.Google Scholar
  9. Burkham, D. E.: 1978, ‘Accuracy of Flood Mapping’, J. Res., U.S. Geol. Survey 6(4), 515-527.Google Scholar
  10. Burton, I., Kates, R. W., and White, G. F.: 1993, The Environment as Hazard, 2nd ed., Guilford Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Carmines, E. and Stimson, J.: 1989, Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  12. Chambers, R.: 1989, ‘Vulnerability, Coping and Policy’, IDS Bulletin 20, 1-7.Google Scholar
  13. Changnon, S. A. (ed.): 1996, The Great Flood of 1993: Causes, Impacts, and Responses, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  14. Changnon, S. A. and Kunkel, K. E.: 1995, ‘Climate-Related Fluctuations in Midwestern Floods During 1921–1985’, J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage. (July/August), 326-334.Google Scholar
  15. Changnon, S. A., Schicht, R., and Semonin, R.: 1983, A Plan for Research on Floods and Their Mitigation in the United States, Final Report to the National Science Foundation, Illinois State Water Survey.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., and Olsen, J. P.: 1972, ‘A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice’, Admin. Sci. Quart. 22, 1-5.Google Scholar
  17. Corrigan, P.: 1993, ‘Flood Forecast Gets Dimmer: St. Louis Harbor Closed, River Des Peres Rising’, St. Louis Post-Dispatch July 9, 1A.Google Scholar
  18. CPW (Committee on Public Works): 1959, A Program for Reducing the National Flood Damage Potential, Memorandum of the chairman to members of the CPW, U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  19. DOC (Department of Commerce): 1994, Natural Disaster Survey Report — The Great Flood of 1993, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  20. Dow, K. and Downing, T. E.: 1995, ‘Vulnerability Research: Where Things Stand’, Human Dimen. Quart. 1(3), 3-5.Google Scholar
  21. Downs, A.: 1972, ‘Up and Down with Ecology: The Issue Attention Cycle’, The Public Interest (Summer), 38-50.Google Scholar
  22. Dracup, J. A. and Kendall, D. R.: 1990, ‘Floods and Droughts’, in Waggoner, P. E. (ed.), Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 243-267.Google Scholar
  23. Faber, S. and Hunt, C.: 1994, ‘River Management Post-1993: The Choice is Ours’, Water Resour. Update 95, 15-20.Google Scholar
  24. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency): 1996, A Dangerous Assumption: The 100-Year Flood, press release, 15 July.Google Scholar
  25. FEMA, 1995: Partnerships for Building Safer Communities, National Mitigation Strategy, FEMA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  26. FEMA: 1989, Flood Studies and Surveys: Historical Statistics, unpublished, summarized in FIFMTF (1992).Google Scholar
  27. FIFMTF (Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force): 1992, Floodplain Management in the United States: An Assessment Report, Volume 2: Full Report, L. R. Johnston Associates, Washington.Google Scholar
  28. FIFMTF: 1994, A Unified National Program for Floodplain Management 1994, FEMA No. 248, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  29. Frederick, K. D. and Kneese, A. V.: 1990, ‘Reallocation by Markets and Prices’, in Waggoner, P. E. (ed.), Climate Change and U.S. Water Resources, John Wiley and Sons, New York, pp. 395-420.Google Scholar
  30. FPMA (Floodplain Management Assessment): 1995, Floodplain Management Assessment of the Upper Mississippi River and Lower Missouri Rivers and Tributaries, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Louis, MO.Google Scholar
  31. Galloway, G. E.: 1995, ‘New Directions in Floodplain Management’, Water Resour. Bull. 31, 351-357.Google Scholar
  32. Glantz, M. H. (ed.): 1976, Politics of Natural Disaster: The Case of the Sahel Drought, Praeger Publishers, New York.Google Scholar
  33. Glantz, M. H.: 1988, Forecasting by Analogy, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  34. Glassheim, E.: 1997, ‘Fear and Loathing in North Dakota’, Natural Hazards Observer 21(6) (July), 1-4.Google Scholar
  35. Goddard, J. E.: 1973, An Evaluation of Urban Flood Plains, ASCE Urban Water Resources Research Program Technical Memorandum No. 19, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, NY.Google Scholar
  36. Gruntfest, E. and Pollack, D.: 1994, ‘Warnings, Mitigation and Litigation: Lessons for Research from the 1993 Floods’, Water Resour. Update 95, 40-44.Google Scholar
  37. Hilgartner, Stephen and Bosk, C.: 1988, ‘The Rise and Fall of Social Problems: A Public Arenas Model’, Amer. J. Sociol. 94(1), 53-78.Google Scholar
  38. Hoyt, W. and Langbein, W. B.: 1955, Floods, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
  39. IFMRC (Interagency Floodplain Management Review Committee): 1994, A Blueprint for Change — Sharing the Challenge: Floodplain Management into the 21st Century, Report of the IFMRC to the Administration Floodplain Management Task Force, U.S. GPO.Google Scholar
  40. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996a, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Contribution of Working Group I to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  41. IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change): 1996b, Climate Change 1995: Impacts, Adaptations, and Mitigation of Climate Change, Scientific-Technical Analyses, Contribution of Working Group II to the Second Assessment Report of the IPCC, Cambridge University Press, London.Google Scholar
  42. ITFFM (Interagency Task Force on Floodplain Management): 1986, A Unified National Program for Floodplain Management, FEMA, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  43. Karl, T. R., Knight, R. W., and Plummer, N.: 1995, ‘Trends in High-Frequency Climate Variability in the Twentieth Century’, Nature 377, 217-220.Google Scholar
  44. Karl, T. R., Knight, R. W., Easterling, D. R., and Quayle, R. C.: 1996, ‘Indices of Climate Change for the United States’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 77(2), 279-292.Google Scholar
  45. Kingdon, J.: 1984, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies, Harper Collins, Boston, p. 240.Google Scholar
  46. Krzysztofowicz, R.: 1995, Recent Advances Associated with Flood Forecast and Warning Systems, U.S. National Report to the International Union of Geodesy and Geophysics 1991–1994, pp. 1139-1147.Google Scholar
  47. Kunkel, K. E., Andsager, R. A., and Easterling, D. R.: 1997, Trends in the Frequency of Heavy Precipitation Events over the U.S., Preprints, Conference on Applied Climatology, December, American Meteorological Society, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
  48. Kusler, J. and Larson, L.: 1993, ‘Beyond the Ark: A New Approach to U.S. Floodplain Management’, Environment 35, 7-11, 31–34.Google Scholar
  49. Lins, H. F. and Michaels, P. J.: 1994, ‘Increasing U.S. Streamflow Linked to Greenhouse Forcing’, EOS: Transact. Amer. Geophys. Union 75, 281ff.Google Scholar
  50. Lord, W. B.: 1994, ‘Flood Hazard Delineation: The One Percent Standard’, Water Resour. Update: Coping with the Flood: The Next Phase 95, 36-39.Google Scholar
  51. Myers, M. F.: 1994, ‘Challenges for the Floodplain Management Tomorrow’, in Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Association of State Floodplain Managers, pp. 441-445.Google Scholar
  52. Myers, M. F. and White, G.: 1993, ‘The Challenge of the Mississippi Flood’, Environment 35, 6-9, 25–35.Google Scholar
  53. Nilson, D.: 1985, ‘Natural Hazard Political Contexts and Adoption Strategies’, Policy Studies Review 4, 734-738.Google Scholar
  54. Olson, R. S. and Nilson, D. C.: 1982, ‘Public Policy Research and Natural Hazards Research: Natural Complements’, Soc. Sci. J. 19, 89-103.Google Scholar
  55. OTA (Office of Technology Assessment): 1993, Preparing for an Uncertain Climate — Volume I, OTA-O-567, U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  56. Palm, R. I.: 1990, Natural Hazards: An Integrative Framework for Research and Planning, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
  57. Philippi, N.: 1994/95, ‘Plugging the Gaps in Flood-Control Policy’, Issues Sci. Technol. (Winter), 71-78.Google Scholar
  58. Pielke Jr., R. A.: 1997a, ‘Asking the Right Questions: Atmospheric Sciences Research and Societal Needs’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 78(2), 255-264.Google Scholar
  59. Pielke Jr., R. A. (ed.): 1997b, Workshop on the Social and Economic Impacts of Weather, held 2–4 April 1997 in Boulder, Colorado, Environmental and Societal Impacts Group, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado.Google Scholar
  60. Pielke Jr., R. A.: 1999, ‘Who Decides? Forecasts and Responsibilities in the 1997 Red River Floods’, Appl. Behavioral Sci. Rev., in press.Google Scholar
  61. Peterson, I.: 1995, ‘In a Missouri Town, Floods are Getting Easier to Recall’, The New York Times, May 22, A1.Google Scholar
  62. Rao, P. G.: 1995, ‘Effect of Climate Change on Streamflows in the Mahanadi River Basin, India’, Water Internat. 20, 205-212.Google Scholar
  63. Rasmussen, J. L.: 1994, ‘Floodplain Management in the 21st Century: A Blueprint for Change — Sharing the Challenge’, Water Internat. 19, 166-176.Google Scholar
  64. Schwein, N. O.: 1996, The Effect of Quantitative Precipitation Forecasts on River Forecasts, NOAA Technical Memorandum NWS CR-110, National Weather Service Office, Kansas City, MO.Google Scholar
  65. Shabman, L.: 1994, ‘Responding to the 1993 Flood: The Restoration Option’, Water Resour. Update 95, 26-30.Google Scholar
  66. Sheaffer and Roland Inc.: 1978, Alternatives for Implementing Substantial Improvement Definitions, Report to the Department on Housing and Urban Development, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  67. Sims, J. H. and Baumann, D. D.: 1983, ‘Educational Programs and Human Response to Natural Hazards’, Environ. Behavior 15(2), 165-169.Google Scholar
  68. Solecki, W. D. and Michaels, S.: 1994, ‘Looking through the Postdisaster Policy Window’, Environ. Manage. 18(4), 587-595.Google Scholar
  69. TFFFCP (Task Force on Federal Flood Control Policy): 1966, A Unified National Program for Managing Flood Losses, Report No. 67-663, U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  70. Tobin, G. A.: 1995, ‘The Levee Love Affair: A Stormy Relationship’, Water Resour. Bull. 31, 359-367.Google Scholar
  71. Thompson, S. A. and White, G. F.: 1985, ‘A National Floodplain Map’, J. Soil Water Conserv. 40, 417-419.Google Scholar
  72. Ungar, S.: 1995, ‘Social Scares and Global Warming: Beyond the Rio Convention’, Soc. Natural Resour. 8, 443-456.Google Scholar
  73. USACE (U.S. Army Corp of Engineers): 1973, Water Resource Needs, Internal summary EC 11-2-86, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  74. U.S. Department of Agriculture: 1967, National Inventory of Soil and Water Conservation Needs 1967, Statisical Bulletin 461, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  75. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey): 1974, Extent and Development of Urban Flood Plains, Circular 601-J, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  76. USWRC (U.S. Water Resources Council): 1976, A Unified National Program for Flood Plain Management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  77. USWRC (U.S. Water Resources Council): 1977, Estimated Flood Damages: Appendix B, Nationwide Analysis Report, U.S. GPO, Washington, D.C. USWRC (U.S. Water Resources Council): 1979, A Unified National Program for Flood Plain Management, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  78. USWRC (U.S. Water Resources Council): 1981, Guideline for Determining Flood Flow Frequency, Bulletin #17B of the Hydrology Committee, revised September.Google Scholar
  79. White, G. F.: 1945, Human Adjustments to Floods: A Geographical Approach to the Flood Problem in the United States, Doctoral Dissertation, Department of Geography, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  80. White, G. F.: 1991, ‘Retrospect and Prospect: An Invited Comment’, in FIFMTF (Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force) 1992, Floodplain Management in the United States: An Assessment Report, Volume 2: Full Report, L. R. Johnston Associates, Washington, pp. VI-1-4.Google Scholar
  81. White, G. F.: 1994, ‘A Perspective on Reducing Losses from Natural Hazards’, Bull. Amer.Meteorol. Soc. 75, 1237-1240.Google Scholar
  82. Wilkins, L.: 1996, ‘Living with the Flood: Human and Governmental Responses to Real and Symbolic Risk’, (Chapter 10), in Changnon, S. A. (ed.), The Great Flood of 1993: Causes, Impacts, and Responses, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  83. WMO (World Meteorological Organization): 1992, International Glossary of Hydrology, UNESCO and WMO, Geneva, Switzerland.Google Scholar
  84. Wood, R. A.: 1993, ‘Flash Flood/Flood State-by-State Fatality Statistics 1945–93’, in Storm Data 1993: A Composite of Outstanding Storms 35(13), NOAA, Washington, D.C., pp. 80-81.Google Scholar
  85. Wood, R. A.: 1994, ‘Flash Flood/Flood Fatalities — 1960 through 1994 — United States, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, Year-by-Year/State-by-State’, in Storm Data and Unusual Weather Phenomena with Late Reports and Corrections 36(12), NOAA, Washington, D.C., pp. 56-58.Google Scholar
  86. Wright, J.: 1996, ‘Effects of the Flood on National Policy: Some Achievements, Major Challenges Remain’, (Chapter 11), in Changnon, S. A. (ed.), The Great Flood of 1993: Causes, Impacts, and Responses, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  87. Zevin, S. F.: 1994, ‘Steps Toward an Integrated Approach to Hydrometeorological Forecasting Services’, Bull. Amer. Meteorol. Soc. 75(7), 1267-1276.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roger A. PielkeJr.
    • 1
  1. 1.Environmental and Societal Impacts GroupNational Center for Atmospheric ResearchColoradoU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations