Cognitive Therapy and Research

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 87–98 | Cite as

Effects of Reward and Response Cost on the Performance and Motivation of Children with ADHD

  • Caryn L. Carlson
  • Miranda Mann
  • David K. Alexander


This study examined the effects of reward and response cost on the performance and motivation of 40 children with ADHD and 40 controls. Participants completed an arithmetic task under one of three (reward, response cost, and no contingency) conditions. Dependent variables included pretest attributional measures, direct performance measures, self-rated performance and motivation, and a postcontingency “free-choice” behavioral motivation measure. Relative to controls, children with ADHD reported a less adaptive attributional style and differed in their attributions for predicted good and poor performance. For children with ADHD, response cost improved accuracy on the arithmetic task relative to reward and resulted in higher motivation in the second half of the behavioral motivation measure; however, reward had a relatively more salutory effect on self-rated motivation. No negative effects of either reward or response cost on perceived performance or willingness to do the task again, or the behavioral motivation measure, were found for either group.

ADHD reward response cost motivation 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Acker, M. M., & O'Leary, S. G. (1987). Effects of reprimands on appropriate behavior in the classroom. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 15, 549-557.Google Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association (1987). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (3rd Ed, rev.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  3. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th Ed.). Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  4. Borcherding, B., Thompson, K., Kruesi, M., Bartko, J., Rapoport, J. L., & Weingartner, H. (1988). Automatic and effortful processing in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 16, 333-345.Google Scholar
  5. Conners, C. K. (1973). Rating scales for use in drug studies with children. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, (Special Issue, Pharmacotherapy of Children) 24-29.Google Scholar
  6. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1997, October). Behaviorists in search of the null: Revisiting the undermining of intrinsic motivation by extrinsic rewards. In C. Sansone & J. Harackiewicz (Chairs), The effects of rewards on motivation and creativity: The debate continues. Symposium conducted at the annual meeting of the Society for Experimental and Social Psychology, Toronto, Canada.Google Scholar
  8. Douglas, V. I. (1985). The response of ADD children to reinforcement: Theoretical and clinical implications. In L. M. Bloomingdale (Ed.), Attention Deficit Disorder: Identification, Course, and Treatment Rationale (pp. 49-65). New York: Spectrum Publications.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (1981). Peabody picture vocabulary test-revised. Circle Pines, Minn.: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  10. DuPaul, G. J., Rapport, M. D., & Perriello, L. M. (1991). Teacher ratings of academic skills: The development of the academic performance rating scale. School Psychology Review, 20, 284-300.Google Scholar
  11. Eisenberger, R., & Cameron, J. (1996). Detriment effects of reward: Reality or myth? American Psychologist, 51, 1153-1166.Google Scholar
  12. Kaslow, N. J., Tannenbaum, R. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1978). The KASTAN-R: A children's attributional style questionnaire (KASTAN-R-CASQ). Unpublished manuscript, University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
  13. Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  14. Lepper, M. R. (1983). Extrinsic reward and intrinsic motivation: Implications for the classroom. In J. M. Levine & M. C. Wang (Eds.), Teacher and student perceptions: Implications for learning, (pp. 281-317). Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Lepper, M. R., & Hodell, M. (1989). Intrinsic motivation in the classroom. In C. Ames & R. Ames (Eds.), Research on Motivation in Education (Vol. 3): Goals and Cognitions (pp. 73-105). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Linn, R. T., & Hodge, G. K. (1982). Locus of control in childhood hyperactivity. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 50, 592-593.Google Scholar
  17. Loney, J., & Milich, R. (1982). Hyperactivity, inattention, and aggression in clinical practice. In M. Wolraich & D. K. Routh (Eds.), Advances in Developmental and Behavior Pediatrics, vol. 3. (pp. 113-147). Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  18. Milich, R. (1994). The response of children with ADHD to failure: If at first you don't succeed, do you try, try again? School Psychology Review, 23, 11-18.Google Scholar
  19. Milich, R., & Okazaki, M. (1991). An examination of learned helplessness among attention deficit hyperactivity disordered boys. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 19, 607-623.Google Scholar
  20. Pelham, W. E., Gnagy, E. M., Greenslade, K. E., & Milich, R. (1992). Teacher ratings of DSM-III-R symptoms for the disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 31, 210-218.Google Scholar
  21. Pfiffner, L. J., & O'Leary, S. G. (1987). The efficacy of all-positive management as a function of the prior use of negative consequences. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 20, 265-271.Google Scholar
  22. Pfiffner, L. J., Rosen, L. A., & O'Leary, S. G. (1985). The efficacy of an all-positive approach to classroom management. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 18, 257-261.Google Scholar
  23. Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1987). Manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.Google Scholar
  24. Rapport, M. D., Murphy, H. A., & Bailey, J. S. (1982). Ritalin vs. response-cost in the control of hyperactive children: A within-subject comparison. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 15, 205-216.Google Scholar
  25. Rosen, L. A., O'Leary, S. G., Joyce, S. A., Conway, G., & Pfiffner, L. J. (1984). The importance of prudent negative consequences for maintaining the appropriate behavior of hyperactive students. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 581-604.Google Scholar
  26. Solanto, M. V. (1990). The effects of reinforcement and response-cost on a delayed response task in children with Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 31, 803-808.Google Scholar
  27. Sullivan, M. A., & O'Leary, S. G. (1989). Differential maintenance following reward and cost token programs with children. Behavior Therapy, 21, 139-151.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Caryn L. Carlson
    • 1
  • Miranda Mann
    • 1
  • David K. Alexander
    • 1
  1. 1.The University of TexasAustin

Personalised recommendations