Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry

, Volume 21, Issue 4, pp 383–403 | Cite as

Biologizing social facts: An early 20th century debate on Kraepelin‘s concepts of culture, neurasthenia, and degeneration

Article

Abstract

This paper uses an historical approach toelucidate two alternative modes ofconceptualizing the relation between socialfactors and psychological phenomena perceivedas pathological.The core features of Neo-Kraepelinianpsychiatric nosology associated with theintroduction of DSM-III in 1980 were also atthe center of a debate in early 20th centuryGermany. The protagonists were EmilKraepelin and Oswald Bumke. Kraepelin‘sempirical research selectively focused onsomatic factors as independent variables,such as alcohol, syphilitic infection, andheredity. The ensuing nosology marginalisedsocial factors which might contribute to theetiology and symptom formation of psychiatricconditions. For Bumke, the disorders in question(including the category of neurasthenia) didnot represent qualitative deviations fromnormal psychological states, but quantitativevariations of ubiquitous psychologicalfunctions caused by a multitude ofsomatic, psychological, and social factors.The main arguments of the historical debateare reconstructed, with special regard to theprofessional and political context. The paper illustrates the importance ofcontext-bound pre-’scientific‘ decisions forthe process of formulating theoreticalconcepts in psychiatry and related disciplines.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Beard, George M. 1880 A Practical Treatise on Nervous Exhaustion (Neurasthenia). New York: William Wood.Google Scholar
  2. 1881 American Nervousness, Its Causes and Consequences. New York: G.P. Putnam's Sons.Google Scholar
  3. 1884 Sexual Neurasthenia (Nervous Exhaustion): Its Hygiene, Causes, Symptoms and Treatment with a Chapter on Diet for the Nervous. New York: E.B. Treat.Google Scholar
  4. Berrios, German E., Renate Hauser 1988 The Early Development of Kraepelin's Ideas on Classification: A Conceptual History. Psychological Medicine 18: 813–821.Google Scholar
  5. Binding, Karl, Alfred Hoche 1920 Die Freigabe der Vernichtung lebensunwerten Lebens: Ihr Mass und ihre Form. Leipzig: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
  6. Blashfield, Roger K. 1984 The Classification of Psychopathology: Neo-Kraepelinian and Quantitative Approaches. New York/London: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bumke, Oswald 1912a Über nervöse Entartung. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
  8. 1912b Zur Frage der funktionellen Psychosen. Fortschritte der naturwissenschaftlichen Forschung 6: 131–152.Google Scholar
  9. 1922 Kultur und Entartung, 2nd rev. ed. Berlin: Julius Springer.Google Scholar
  10. Burleigh, Michael 1994 Death and Deliverance. ‘Euthanasia’ in Germany ca. 1900–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Colp, Ralph 1995 History of Psychiatry. InHarold I. Kaplan, Benjamin J. Sadock, eds., Comprehensive Textbook of Psychiatry, Vol. II, 6th ed., pp. 2777–2801. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
  12. Dening, Tom R., German E. Berrios 1991 Introduction to: Alfred Hoche, The Significance of Symptom Complexes in Psychiatry [Engl. transl.]. History of Psychiatry 2: 329–333.Google Scholar
  13. Dowbiggin, Ian R. 1991 Inheriting Madness. Professionalization and Psychiatric Knowledge in Nineteenth-Century France. Berkeley/Los Angeles/Oxford: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  14. Emminghaus, Hermann 1878 Allgemeine Psychopathologie zur Einführung in das Studium der Geistesst örungen. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel.Google Scholar
  15. Engstrom, Eric J. 1991 Emil Kraepelin: Psychiatry and Public Affairs in Wilhelmine Germany. History of Psychiatry 2: 111–132.Google Scholar
  16. Eulner, Hans-Heinz 1970 Die Entwicklung der medizinischen Spezialfächer an den Universitäten des deutschen Sprachgebietes. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke.Google Scholar
  17. Gaupp, Robert 1909 Die wachsende Nervosität unsrer Zeit. Deutsche Revue 11: 154–166.Google Scholar
  18. 1919 Der nervöse Zusammenbruch und die Revolution. Blätter für Volksgesundheitspflege 19 (5/6): 43–46.Google Scholar
  19. Gosling, Francis G. 1987 Before Freud: Neurasthenia and the American Medical Community. Springfield: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  20. Griesinger, Wilhelm 1845 Die Pathologie und Therapie der psychischen Krankheiten [4th ed. 1876]. Stuttgart: Adolph Krabbe.Google Scholar
  21. Hoche, Alfred 1906 Kritisches zur psychiatrischen Formenlehre. Allgemeine Zeitschrift für Psychiatrie 63: 559–563.Google Scholar
  22. 1910 Geisteskrankheit und Kultur. Freiburg/Leipzig: Speyer & Kaerner.Google Scholar
  23. 1912 Die Bedeutung der Symptomenkomplexe in der Psychiatrie. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 12: 540–551; Engl. transl.: The Significance of Symptom Complexes in Psychiatry. History of Psychiatry 1991; 2: 334–343.Google Scholar
  24. 1915 Krieg und Seelenleben. Freiburg/Leipzig: Speyer & Koerner.Google Scholar
  25. Hoff, Paul 1994 Emil Kraepelin und die Psychiatrie als klinische Wissenschaft. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Jablensky, A., H. Hugler, M. von Cranach, K. Kalinov 1993 Kraepelin Revisited: A Reassessment and Statistical Analysis of Dementia Praecox and Manic-Depressive Insanity in 1908. Psychological Medicine 23: 843–858.Google Scholar
  27. Klerman, G. L. 1978 The Evolution of a Scientific Nosology. InJ.C. Shershow, ed., Schizophrenia: Science and Practice, pp. 99–121. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Kraepelin, Emil 1883 Compendium der Psychiatrie. Leipzig: Ambrosius Abel.Google Scholar
  29. 1887 Die Richtungen der psychiatrischen Forschung. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel.Google Scholar
  30. 1896 Psychiatrie. Ein Lehrbuch für Studirende und Aerzte (5th, compl. rev. ed.). Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth.Google Scholar
  31. 1902 Die Diagnose der Neurasthenie. Münchner Medizinische Wochenschrift 49: 1641–1644.Google Scholar
  32. 1904a Vergleichende Psychiatrie. Centralblatt für Nervenheilkunde und Psychiatrie 27 (= N.F. 15): 433–437.Google Scholar
  33. 1904b Psychiatrisches aus Java. Centralblatt für Nervenheilkunde und Psychiatrie 27 (= N.F. 15): 468–468.Google Scholar
  34. 1908 Zur Entartungsfrage. Zentralblatt für Nervenheilkunde und Psychiatrie 31 (= N.F. 19): 745–751.Google Scholar
  35. 1919 Psychiatrische Randbemerkungen zur Zeitgeschichte. Süddeutsche Monatshefte 16: 171–183; Engl. transl.: Psychiatric Observations on Contemporary Issues. History of Psychiatry 1992; 3: 256–269.Google Scholar
  36. 1983 Lebenserinnerungen. Hanns Hippius, Gerd Peters, Detlev Ploog, eds. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer; Engl. transl.: Memoirs. Berlin/New York: Springer 1987.Google Scholar
  37. Krafft-Ebing, Richard von 1879 Lehrbuch der Psychiatrie auf klinischer Grundlage. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  38. Müller, Franz Carl (ed.) 1893 Handbuch der Neurasthenie. Leipzig: F.C.W. Vogel.Google Scholar
  39. Proctor, Robert N. 1988 Racial Hygiene. Medicine Under the Nazis. Cambridge,Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Radkau, Joachim 1994 Die wilhelminische Ära als nervöses Zeitalter, oder: Die Nerven als Netz zwischen Tempo-und Körpergeschichte. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 20: 211–241.Google Scholar
  41. Roelcke, Volker 1996 Die wissenschaftliche Vermessung der Geisteskrankheiten: Emil Kraepelins Lehre von den endogenen Psychosen. InHeinz Schott, ed., Meilensteine der Medizin, pp. 389–395. Dortmund: Harenberg.Google Scholar
  42. 1997 Laborwissenschaft und Psychiatrie: Prämissen und Implikationen bei Emil Kraepelins Neuformulierung der psychiatrischen Krankheitslehre. InThomas Schlick, Christoph Gradmann, eds., Strategien der Kausalität: Modelle und Institutionen ätiologischen Denkens in Medizin und Naturwissenschaft des 19. und 20. Jahrhunderts. Pfaffenwhiler: Centaurus (in press).Google Scholar
  43. Roelcke, Volker, Gerrit Hohendorf, Maike Rotzoll 1994 Psychiatric Research and “Euthanasia”. The Case of the Psychiatric Department at the University of Heidelberg, 1941–1945. History of Psychiatry 5: 517–532.Google Scholar
  44. Rosenberg, Charles E 1962 The Place of George M. Beard in Nineteenth-Century Psychiatry. Bulletin of the History of Medicine 36: 245–259.Google Scholar
  45. Rüdin, Ernst 1904 Zur Rolle der Homosexuellen im Lebensprozeß der Rasse. Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie 1: 99–109.Google Scholar
  46. 1909 [Review of] Emil Kräpelin. Zur Entartungsfrage. Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie 6: 254–257.Google Scholar
  47. 1910 Über den Zusammenhang zwischen Geisteskrankheit und Kultur. Archiv für Rassen-und Gesellschaftsbiologie 7: 722–748.Google Scholar
  48. Sabshin, Melvin 1990 Turning Points in Twentieth-Century American Psychiatry. Am J Psychiatry 147: 1267–1274.Google Scholar
  49. Schimmelpennig, Gustav W. 1993 Oswald Bumke (1877–1950). His Life and Work. History of Psychiatry 4: 483–497.Google Scholar
  50. Siemen, Hans-Ludwig 1987 Menschen blieben auf der Strecke... Psychiatrie zwischen Reform und Nationalsozialismus. Gütersloh: Jakob van Hoddis.Google Scholar
  51. Weber, Matthias M. 1991 “Ein Forschungsinstitut für Psychiatrie... ”: Die Entwicklung der Deutschen Forschungsanstalt für Psychiatrie in München zwischen 1917 und 1945. Sudhoffs Archiv 75: 74–89.Google Scholar
  52. 1993 Ernst Rüdin. Eine kritische Biographie. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  53. Weindling, Paul 1989 Health, Race and German Politics between National Unification and Nazism, 1870–1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Wessely, Simon 1990 Old Wine in New Bottles: Neurasthenia and ME. Psychological Medicine 20: 35–53.Google Scholar
  55. Wilson, Mitchell 1993 DSM-III and the Transformation of American Psychiatry: A History. Am J Psychiatry 150: 399–410.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Medizinhistorisches Institut der Universität BonnBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations