Climatic Change

, Volume 40, Issue 3–4, pp 457–493

Regional Nested Model Simulations of Present Day and 2 × CO2 Climate over the Central Plains of the U.S.

  • Filippo Giorgi
  • Linda O. Mearns
  • Christine Shields
  • Larry McDaniel


A nested regional climate model is used to generate a scenario of climate change over the MINK region (Missouri, Iowa, Nebraska, Kansas) due to doubling of carbon dioxide concentration (2 × CO2) for use in agricultural impact assessment studies. Five-year long present day (control) and 2 × CO2 simulations are completed at a horizontal grid point spacing of 50 km. Monthly and seasonal precipitation and surface air temperature over the MINK region are reproduced well by the model in the control run, except for an underestimation of both variables during the spring months. The performance of the nested model in the control run is greatly improved compared to a similar experiment performed with a previous version of the nested modeling system by Giorgi et al. (1994). The nested model generally improves the simulation of spatial precipitation patterns compared to the driving general circulation model (GCM), especially during the summer. Seasonal surface warming of 4 to 6 K and seasonal precipitation increases of 6 to 24% are simulated in 2 × CO2 conditions. The control run temperature biases are smaller than the simulated changes in all seasons, while the precipitation biases are of the same order of magnitude as the simulated changes. Although the large scale patterns of change in the driving GCM and nested RegCM model are similar, significant differences between the models, and substantial spatial variability, occur within the MINK region.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Briegleb, B. P.: 1992, ‘Delta-Eddington Approximation for Solar Radiation in the NCAR Community Model, J. Geophys. Res. 97, 7603-7612.Google Scholar
  2. Christensen, J. H., Machenhauer, B., Jones, R. G., Schaar, C., Ruti, P. M., Castro, M., and Visconti, G.: 1997, ‘Validation of Present-Day Regional Climate Simulations over Europe. LAM Simulations with Observed Boundary Conditions’, Clim. Dyn. 13, 489-506.Google Scholar
  3. Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P. J., 1993: Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as Coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model, Technical Note, (NCAR/TN-387+STR, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, p. 72.Google Scholar
  4. Easterling, W. E., Crosson, P. R., Rosenberg, N. J., McKinney, M. S., Katz, L. A., and Lemon, K. M., 1993: ‘Agricultural Impacts and Responses to Climate Change in the Missouri-Iowa-Nebraska-Kansas (MINK) Region’, Clim. Change 24, 23-61.Google Scholar
  5. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: 1991, ‘Approaches to the Simulation of Regional Climate Change: A Review’, Rev. Geophys. 29, 191-216.Google Scholar
  6. Giorgi, F. and Marinucci, M. R.: 1996, ‘A Study of the Sensitivity of Simulated Precipitation to Model Resolution and Its Implications for Climate Studies. Monthly Weather Review 124, 148-166.Google Scholar
  7. Giorgi, F., Mearns, L. O., Shields, C., and Mayer, L.: 1996, ‘A Regional Model Study of the Importance of Local vs. Remote Controls inMaintaining the Drought 1988 and Flood 1993 Conditions in the Central U.S., J. Clim. 9, 1150-1162.Google Scholar
  8. Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M. R., and Bates, G. T.: 1993a, ‘Development of a Second Generation Regional Climate Model (RegCM2): Boundary Layer and Radiative Transfer Processes’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 2794-2813.Google Scholar
  9. Giorgi, F., Marinucci, M. R., De Canio, G., and Bates, G. T.: 1993b, ‘Development of a Second Generation Regional Climate Model (RegCM2): Convective Processes and Assimilation of Lateral Boundary Conditions’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 121, 2814-2832.Google Scholar
  10. Giorgi, F., Shields Brodeur, C., and Bates, G. T.: 1994, ‘Regional Climate Change Scenarios over the United States Produced with a Nested Regional Climate Model’, J. Clim. 7, 375-399.Google Scholar
  11. Giorgi, F., Hurrell, J. W., Marinucci, M. R., and Beniston, M.: 1997, ‘Elevation Signal in Surface Climate Change: A Model Study’, J. Clim 10, 288-296.Google Scholar
  12. Grell, G. A., Dudhia, J., and Stauffer, D. R.: 1994, A Description of the Fifth Generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), NCAR Technical Note, NCAR/TN-398+STR, p. 121.Google Scholar
  13. Holtslag, A. A. M., de Bruijn, E. I. F., and Pan, H. L.: 1990, ‘A High Resolution Air Transformation Model for Short-Range Weather Forecasting’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 118, 1561-1575.Google Scholar
  14. Kattenberg, G. A., Giorgi, F., Grassl, H., Meehl, G. A., Mitchell, J. F. B., Stouffer, R., Tokioka, T., Weaver, A., and Wigley, T.: 1996, ‘Climate Models-Projections of Future Climate’, Chapter 6 of the 1995 IPCC Climate Change Report, Cambridge University Press, pp. 285-358.Google Scholar
  15. Legates, D. R. and Willmott, C. J.: 1990a, ‘Mean Seasonal and Spatial Variability in Gauge-Corrected, Global Precipitation’, Int. J. Clim. 10, 111-127.Google Scholar
  16. Legates, D. R. and Willmott, C. J.: 1990b, ‘Mean Seasonal and Spatial Variability in Global Surface Air Temperature’, Theor. Appl. Climatol. 41, 11-21.Google Scholar
  17. Loveland, T. R., Merchant, J. W., Ohlen, D. O., and Brown, J. F.: 1991, ‘Development of a Land Cover Characteristics Database for the Conterminous United States’, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 57, 1453-1463.Google Scholar
  18. Madden, R. A. and Williams, J.: 1978, ‘The Correlation Between Temperature and Precipitation in the United States and Europe’, Mon. Wea. Rev. 106, 142-147.Google Scholar
  19. Matson, M., Ropelewski, C. F., and Varnadore, M. S.: 1986, An Atlas of Satellite-Derived Northern Hemispheric Snow Cover Frequency. U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Asheville, N.C., p. 75.Google Scholar
  20. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., McDaniel, L., and Shields, C.: 1995, ‘Analysis of the Diurnal Range and Variability of Daily Temperature in a Nested Modeling Experiment: Comparison with Observations and 2 × CO2 Results’, Clim. Dyn. 11, 193-209.Google Scholar
  21. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., Easterling, W., and Weiss, A.: 1996, ‘Development of a Nested Regional Model for the Conterminous U.S. and Formation of High Resolution Climate Change Scenarios with an Application to Crop-Climate Models. In Toward an Integrated Regional Research Program on Global Change and the Nation’s Major Grasslands, Great Plains Regional Center for Global Environmental Change, U.S. Dept. of Energy, Report No. GPRC 96-01, pp. 47-50.Google Scholar
  22. Mearns, L. O., Rosenzweig, C., and Goldberg, R.: 1997, ‘Mean and Variance Change in Climate Scenarios: Methods, Agricultural Applications, Measures of Uncertainty, Clim. Change 35, 367-396.Google Scholar
  23. Mearns, L. O., Easterling, W., Hayes, C., and Giorgi, F.: 1998a, ‘Comparison of Agricultural Impacts of Climate Change Calculated from High and Low Resolution Climate Model Scenarios: The Uncertainty of Spatial Scale’, in preparation for Clim. Change.Google Scholar
  24. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., Shields, S., McDaniel, L., and Easterling, W.: 1998b, ‘Evaluation of High Frequency Variability of Climate in Regional Climate Model Experiments over the U.S. Great Plains: An Impacts Perspective’, in preparation for J. Clim..Google Scholar
  25. Parkinson, C. L. and Washington, W. M., 1979: ‘A Large Scale Numerical Model of Sea Ice, J. Geophys. Res. 84, 311-337.Google Scholar
  26. Schlesinger, M. E. and Mitchell, J. F. B., 1987: ‘Climate Model Simulations of the Equilibrium Climatic Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide’, Rev. Geophys. 25, 760-798.Google Scholar
  27. Thompson, S. L. and Pollard, D.: 1995, ‘A Global Climate Model (GENESIS) with a Land Surface Transfer Scheme (LSX), Part I: Present Climate Simulation’, J. Clim. 8, 732-761.Google Scholar
  28. Washington, W. M. and Meehl, G. A.: 1993, ‘Greenhouse Sensitivity Experiments with Penetrative Cumulus Convective and Tropical Cirrus Albedo Effects’, Clim. Dyn. 8, 211-223.Google Scholar
  29. Watterson, I. G., Dix, M. R., Gordon, H. B., and McGregor, J. L.: 1995, ‘The CSIRO Nine-Level Atmospheric General Circulation Model and Its Equilibrium Present and Doubled CO2 Climates’, Aust. Met. Mag. 44, 111-125.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Filippo Giorgi
    • 1
  • Linda O. Mearns
    • 1
  • Christine Shields
    • 1
  • Larry McDaniel
    • 1
  1. 1.National Center for Atmospheric ResearchBoulderU.S.A

Personalised recommendations