Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 237–309 | Cite as

Questions in Dialogue

  • Nicholas Asher
  • Alex Lascarides

Abstract

In this paper we explore how compositional semantics, discourse structure, and the cognitive states of participants all contribute to pragmatic constraints on answers to questions in dialogue. We synthesise formal semantic theories on questions and answers with techniques for discourse interpretation familiar from computational linguistics, and show how this provides richer constraints on responses in dialogue than either component can achieve alone.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Asher, N.: 1986, 'Belief in Discourse Representation Theory', Journal of Philosophical Logic 15, 127–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asher, N.: 1987, 'A Typology for Attitude Verbs', Linguistics and Philosophy 10, 125–197.Google Scholar
  3. Asher, N.: 1993, Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  4. Asher, N.: 1996, 'Mathematical Treatments of Discourse Contexts', in P. Dekker and M. Stokhot (eds.), Proceedings of the Tenth Amsterdam Colloquium in Formal Semantics, ILLC Publications, University of Amsterdam, pp 21–40.Google Scholar
  5. Asher, N. and R. Koons: 1993, 'The Revision of Beliefs and Intentions in a Changing World', in Proceedings of the AAI Spring Symposium Series: Reasoning about Mental States: Formal Theories and Applications. Google Scholar
  6. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides: 1994, 'Intentions and Information in Discourse', in Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Computational Linguistics (ACL94), Las Cruces, pp. 35–41.Google Scholar
  7. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides: 1995, 'Lexical Disambiguation in a Discourse Context', Journal of Semantics 12, 69–108.Google Scholar
  8. Asher, N. and P. Sablayrolles: 1995, 'A Typology and Discourse Semantics for Motion Verbs and Spatial PPs in French', Journal of Semantics 12(2), 163–210.Google Scholar
  9. Belnap, N. D. Jr.: 1985, 'Questions and Answers in Montague Grammar', in S. Peters and E. Saarinen (eds.), Processes, Beliefs, and Questions, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 165–198.Google Scholar
  10. Bennett, M.: 1979, Questions in Montague Grammar, Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
  11. Bromberger, S.: 1962, 'An Approach to Explanation', in R. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, Oxford University Press, pp. 72–105.Google Scholar
  12. Cohen, P. and H. Levesque: 1990, 'Rational Interaction as the Basis for Communication', in P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. E. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, Bradford/MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 221–255.Google Scholar
  13. Copestake, A.: 1992, The Representation of Lexical Semantic Information, Ph.D. thesis, University of Sussex, Cognitive Science Research Paper CSRP-280.Google Scholar
  14. Dalrymple, M., M. Kanazawa, Y. Kim, S. Mchombo, and S. Peters: 1998, 'Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity', Linguistics and Philosophy 21, 159–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dwork, C. and Y. Moses: 1986, 'Knowledge and Common Knowledge in a Byzantine Environment I: Crash Failures', in J. Halpern (ed.), Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning About Knowledge: Proceedings of the 1986 Conference, pp. 149–169.Google Scholar
  16. Fernando, T.: 1994, 'What is a DRS?', in R. Cooper and J. Groonendijk (eds.), Integrating Semantic Theories II, Dyana Deliverable R2.1.B, 1994, also appeared in the Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Computational Semantics, Tilhurg, 1994.Google Scholar
  17. Ginzburg, J.: 1993, 'Resolving Questions, Technical report HCRC/RP-46', Human Communication Research Centre, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  18. Ginzburg, J.: 1995, 'Resolving Questions Part I', Linguistics and Philosophy 18(5), 459–527.Google Scholar
  19. Ginzburg, J.: 1995, 'Resolving Questions Part II', Linguistics and Philosophy 18(6), 567–609.Google Scholar
  20. Green, N. and S. Carberry: 1994, 'A Hybrid Reasoning Model for Indirect Answers', Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 58–65.Google Scholar
  21. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1982, 'Semantic Analysis of wh-Complements', Linguistics and Philosophy 5.Google Scholar
  22. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. thesis, Centrale Interfaculteit, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Grosz, B. and S. Kraus: 1993, 'Collaborative Plans for Group Activities', in Proceedings of the International Joint Conference in Artificial Intelligence (IJCA193), Chambery, France, August 1993, pp. 367–373.Google Scholar
  24. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner: 1986, 'Attention, Intentions and the Structure of Discourse', Computational Linguistics 12, 175–204.Google Scholar
  25. Grosz, B. and C. Sidner: 1990, 'Plans for Discourse', in Philip R. Cohen, Jerry Morgan and Martha A. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp. 417–444.Google Scholar
  26. Halpern, J. and Y. Moses: 1984, 'Towards a Theory of Knowledge and Ignorance: Preliminary Report', in Proceedings of the Non-Monotonic Reasoning Workshop, AAAI Fall Symposium, October 1984, pp. 125–143.Google Scholar
  27. Hobbs, J.: 1985, 'On the Coherence and Structure of Discourse', Report No. CSLI-85-37, Center for the Study of Language and Information, October, 1985.Google Scholar
  28. Hobbs, J., M. Stickel, D. Appelt, and P. Martin: 1993, 'Interpretation as Abduction', Artificial Intelligence 63(1–2), 69–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hovy, E. H.: 1988, 'Planning Coherent Multisentence Text', in Proceedings of the 26th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL88), pp. 163–169.Google Scholar
  30. Kamp, H.: 1990, 'Propositional Attitudes', in C. A. Anderson and J. Owens (eds.), The Role of Content in Logic, Language, and Mind, CSLI Lecture Notes 20, University of Chicago Press, pp. 27–90.Google Scholar
  31. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  32. Karttunen, L.: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1.Google Scholar
  33. Lascarides, A. and N. Asher: 1993, 'Temporal Interpretation, Discourse Relations and Commonsense Entailment', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 437–493.Google Scholar
  34. Litman, D. and J. Allen: 1990, 'Discourse Processing and Commonsense Plans', in Philip R. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp. 365–388.Google Scholar
  35. Lochboum, K.: 1993, 'A Collaborative Planning Approach to Discourse Understanding', Technical Report TR-20-93, Center for Research in Computing Technology, Harvard University.Google Scholar
  36. Lochbaum, K.: 1995, 'The Use of Knowledge Preconditions in Language Processing', in Proceedings for the 14th Joint International Conference in Artificial Intelligence (IJCA195), Montreal, August 1995.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, W. C. and S. Thompson: 1986, 'Rhetorical Structure Theory: Description and Construction of Text', ISI Technical Report Number RS-86-174.Google Scholar
  38. Moore, J. and C. Paris: 1993, 'Planning Text for Advisory Dialogues: Capturing Intentional and Rhetorical Information', Computational Linguistics 19(4), 651–694.Google Scholar
  39. Moore, J. and M. Pollack: 1992, 'A Problem for RST: The Need for Multi Level Discourse Analysis', Computational Linguistics 18(4), 537–544.Google Scholar
  40. Perrault, R.: 1990, 'An Application of Default Logic to Speech Act Theory', in P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp. 161–186.Google Scholar
  41. Polanyi, L.: 1985, 'A Theory of Discourse Structure and Discourse Coherence', in Papers from the Ceneral Session at the Twenty-First Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, pp. 25–27.Google Scholar
  42. Pollack, M.: 1986, Inferring Domain Plans in Question-Answering, Doctoral dissertation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.Google Scholar
  43. Pollack, M.: 1990, 'Plans as Complex Mental Attitudes', in P. R. Cohen, J. Morgan and M. A. Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication, MIT Press, pp. 77–104.Google Scholar
  44. Sandt, S. van der: 1992, 'Presupposition Projection as Anaphora Resolution', Journal of Semantics 9, 133–377.Google Scholar
  45. Searle, J.: 1969, Speech Acts, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  46. Singh, M. and N. Asher: 1993, 'A Logic of Intentions and Beliefs', Journal of Philosophical Logic 22, 513–544.Google Scholar
  47. Stalnaker, R.: 1978, 'Assertion', in P. Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics volume 9: Pragmatics, Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Webber, B. B.: 1991, 'Structure and Ostension in the Interpretation of Discourse Deixis', Language and Cognitive Processes 6(2), 107–135.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas Asher
    • 1
  • Alex Lascarides
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Texas at AustinAustinUSA, e-mail
  2. 2.Centre for Cognitive Science and HCRCUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghScotland, e-mail

Personalised recommendations