Erkenntnis

, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 127–135

Barry Gower, Scientific Method. An historical and philosophical introduction Márta Fehér, Changing Tools. Case studies in the history of scientific methodology

Article
  • 122 Downloads

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Feyerabend, P. K.: 1998, ‘On the Limited Validity of Methodological Rules’, in John Preston (ed.), Knowledge, Science and Relativism. Philosophical Papers, Vol. 3, Translated from the German (1972) by Eric Oberheim and Daniel Sirtes, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  2. Hoyningen-Huene, P.: 1998, ‘Philosophical Elements in Kuhn's Historiography’ in I. Buchwald and G. Smith (eds.), The Legacy of T. S. Kuhn, Dibner Institute Studies, Chicago.Google Scholar
  3. Kuhn, T. S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  4. Mayr, E.: 1990, ‘When is Historiography Whiggish?’, Journal of the History of Ideas 51, 301–309.Google Scholar
  5. McEvoy, J. G.: 1977, ‘Positivism, Whiggism, and the Chemical Revolution: A Study in the Historiography of Chemistry’, History of Science 35, 1–33.Google Scholar
  6. Turner, J. R. G.: 1990, ‘The History of Science and the Working Scientist’, in Olby et al. (eds.), Companion to the History of Modern Science, Routledge, London, pp. 23–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Personalised recommendations