, Volume 49, Issue 1, pp 1–20 | Cite as

Hypothetico-Deductivism: The Current State of Play; the Criterion of Empirical Significance: Endgame


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Ayer, A. J.: 1971, Language, Truth and Logic, Pelican Books, Middlesex.Google Scholar
  2. Earman, J. (ed.): 1983, Testing Scientific Theories, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  3. Earman, J. (ed.): 1992, Bayes or Bust, The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Gemes, K.: 1990, ‘Horwich, Hempel, and Hypothetico-Deductivism’, Philosophy of Science 57, 609–702.Google Scholar
  5. Gemes, K.: 1990, ‘Hypothetico-Deductivism, Content, and the Natural Axiomatization of Theories’, Philosophy of Science 60, 477–487.Google Scholar
  6. Gemes, K.: 1994, ‘Schurz on Hypothetic-Deductivism’, Erkenntnis 41, 171–181.Google Scholar
  7. Gemes, K.: 1994a, ‘Explanation, Unification, and Content’, Nous 28, 225–240.Google Scholar
  8. Gemes, K.: 1994b, ‘A New Theory of Content’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 23, 596–620.Google Scholar
  9. Gemes, K.: 1997, ‘A New Theory of Content II: Model Theory and Some Alternatives’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 26, 449–476.Google Scholar
  10. Gemes, K.: 1998, ‘Logical Content and Empirical Significance’, in P. Weingartner, G. Schurz and G. Dorn (eds.), Proceedings of the 20th International Wittgenstein Symposium, Hölder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.Google Scholar
  11. Gemes, K.: 1998a, ‘Carnap-Confirmation, Content-Cutting, and Real Confirmation’, forthcoming.Google Scholar
  12. Glymour, C.: 1980, Theory and Evidence, Princeton University Press, Princeton.Google Scholar
  13. Glymour, C.: 1980a, ‘Discussion: Hypothetico-Deductivism is Hopeless’, Philosophy of Science 47, 322–325.Google Scholar
  14. Hempel, C. G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  15. Horwich, P.: 1983, ‘Explanations of Irrelevance’, in Earman 1983, pp. 55–65.Google Scholar
  16. Schurz, G.: 1991, ‘Relevant Deduction’, Erkenntnis 35, 391–437.Google Scholar
  17. Schurz, G.: 1994, ‘Relevant Deduction and Hypothetico-Deductivism: A Reply to Gemes’, Erkenntnis 41, 183–188.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Personalised recommendations