Climatic Change

, Volume 35, Issue 4, pp 397–414




Climate change scenarios with a high spatial and temporal resolution are required in the evaluation of the effects of climate change on agricultural potential and agricultural risk. Such scenarios should reproduce changes in mean weather characteristics as well as incorporate the changes in climate variability indicated by the global climate model (GCM) used. Recent work on the sensitivity of crop models and climatic extremes has clearly demonstrated that changes in variability can have more profound effects on crop yield and on the probability of extreme weather events than simple changes in the mean values. The construction of climate change scenarios based on spatial regression downscaling and on the use of a local stochastic weather generator is described. Regression downscaling translated the coarse resolution GCM grid-box predictions of climate change to site-specific values. These values were then used to perturb the parameters of the stochastic weather generator in order to simulate site-specific daily weather data. This approach permits the incorporation of changes in the mean and variability of climate in a consistent and computationally inexpensive way. The stochastic weather generator used in this study, LARS-WG, has been validated across Europe and has been shown to perform well in the simulation of different weather statistics, including those climatic extremes relevant to agriculture. The importance of downscaling and the incorporation of climate variability are demonstrated at two European sites where climate change scenarios were constructed using the UK Met. Office high resolution GCM equilibrium and transient experiments.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bardossy, A. and Plate, E. J.: 1991, 'Modelling Daily Rainfall Using a Semi-Markov Representation of Circulation Pattern Occurrence’, J. Hydrology 122, 33–47.Google Scholar
  2. Bailey, N. T. J.: 1964, The Elements of Stochastic Processes, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Barrow, E. M., Semenov, M. A., and Hulme, M.: 1995, 'Construction of Site-Specific Scenarios’, in Harrison, P. A., Butterfield, R. E., and Downing, T. E. (eds.), Climate Change and Agriculture in Europe: Assessment of Impacts and Adaptation, Environmental Change Unit Research Report No. 9, Oxford, pp. 30–47.Google Scholar
  4. Barrow, E. M. and Semenov, M. A.: 1995, 'Climate Change Scenarios with High Spatial and Temporal Resolution for Agricultural Applications’, Forestry 68, 349–360.Google Scholar
  5. Barrow, E. M., Hulme, M., and Semenov, M. A.: 1996, 'The Effect of Using Different Methods in the Construction of Climate Change Scenarios: Examples from Europe’, Clim. Res. (in press).Google Scholar
  6. Dickinson, R. E., Errico, R. M., Giorgi, F., and Bates, G. T.: 1989, 'A Regional Climate Model for the Western United States’, Climatic Change 15, 383–422.Google Scholar
  7. Gabriel, R. and Neumann, J.: 1962, 'A Markov Chain Model for Daily Rainfall Occurrence in Tel Aviv, Israel’, Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 88, 90–95.Google Scholar
  8. Gates, W. L., Rowntree, P. R., and Zeng, Q.-C.: 1990, 'Validation of Climate Models,’ in Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 93–130.Google Scholar
  9. Giorgi, F.: 1990, 'Simulation of Regional Climate Using a Limited Area Model Nested in a GCM’, J. Climate 3, 941–963.Google Scholar
  10. Giorgi, F. and Mearns, L. O.: 1991, 'Approaches to the Simulation of Regional Climate Change: A Review’, Rev. Geophys. 29, 191–216.Google Scholar
  11. Houghton, J. T., Meira Filho, L. G., Callander, B. A., Kattenburg, A., and Maskell, K. (eds.): 1996, Climate Change 1995: The Science of Climate Change, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Hulme, M., Briffa, K. R., Jones, P. D., and Senior, C. A.: 1993, 'Validation of GCM Control Simulations Using Indices of Daily Airflow Types over the British Isles’, Climate Dynamics 9, 95–105.Google Scholar
  13. Hutchinson, M.: 1995, 'Stochastic Space-Time Weather Models from Ground-Based Data’, Agric. For. Meteor. 73, 237–265.Google Scholar
  14. Jones, P.D. and Conway, D.: 1995, 'The Use of Weather Types for GCM Downscaling’, in Proceedings of International Conference on Statistical Climatology, Galway, Ireland, June 1995.Google Scholar
  15. Jamieson, P. D., Semenov, M. A., Brooking, I. R., and Francis, G. S.: 1996, 'Sirius: A Mechanistic Model of Wheat Response to Environmental Variation’, Field Crop Res. (submitted).Google Scholar
  16. Karl, T. R., Wang, W.-C., Schlesinger, M. E., Knight, R. W., and Portman, D.: 1990, 'A Method of Relating General Circulation Model Simulated Climate to the Observed Local Climate. Part I: Seasonal Statistics’, J. Climate 3, 1063–1079.Google Scholar
  17. Katz, R. W. and Brown, B. G.: 1992, 'Extreme Events in a Changing Climate: Variability is More Important than Averages’, Climatic Change 21, 289–302.Google Scholar
  18. Kenny, G. J., Harrison, P. A., and Parry, M. L. (eds.): 1993, The Effect of Climate Change on Agricultural and Horticultural Potential in Europe, Research Report No. 2, Environmental Change Unit, University of Oxford, 224 pp.Google Scholar
  19. Kim, J.-W., Chang, J.-T., Baker, N. L., Wilks, D. S., and Gates, W. L.: 1984, 'The Statistical Problem of Climate Inversion: Determination of the Relationship between Local and Large-Scale Climate’, Monthly Weather Review 112, 2069–2077.Google Scholar
  20. Matyasovszky, I., Bogardi, I., Bardossy, A., and Duckstein, L.: 1993, 'Space-Time Precipitation Reflecting Climate Change’, Hydrological Sciences 38, 539–558.Google Scholar
  21. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., Mcdaniel, L., and Shields, C.: 1995a, 'Analysis of Variability and Diurnal Range of Daily Temperature in a Nested Regional Climate Model — Comparison with Observations and Doubled CO2 Results’, Climate Dynamics 11, 193–209.Google Scholar
  22. Mearns, L. O., Giorgi, F., Mcdaniel, L., and Shields, C.: 1995b 'Analysis of Daily Variability of Precipitation in a Nested Regional Climate Model — Comparison with Observations and Doubled CO2 Results’, Global and Planetary Change 10, 55–78.Google Scholar
  23. Mearns, L. O., Rosenzweig, C., and Goldberg, R.: 1996, 'The Effect of Changes in Daily and Interannual Climatic Variability on CERES-Wheat Yields. A Sensitivity Study’, Climatic Change 32, 257–292.Google Scholar
  24. Mitchell, J. F. B., Manabe, S., Meleshko, V., and Tokioka, T.: 1990, 'Equilibrium Climate Change-and Its Implications for the Future’, in Houghton, J. T., Jenkins, G. J., and Ephraums, J. J. (eds.), Climate Change: The IPCC Scientific Assessment, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 131–172.Google Scholar
  25. Murphy, J. M.: 1995, 'Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part I: Control Climate and Flux Adjustment’, J. Climate 8, 36–56.Google Scholar
  26. Murphy, J. M. and Mitchell, J. F. B.: 1995, 'Transient Response of the Hadley Centre Coupled Ocean-Atmosphere Model to Increasing Carbon Dioxide. Part II: Spatial and Temporal Structure of the Response’, J. Climate 8, 57–80.Google Scholar
  27. Racsko, P., Szeidl, L., and Semenov, M.: 1991, 'A Serial Approach to Local Stochastic Weather Models’, Ecological Modelling 57, 27–41.Google Scholar
  28. Richardson, C. W.: 1981, 'Stochastic Simulation of Daily Precipitation, Temperature and Solar Radiation’, Water Resources Research 17, 182–190.Google Scholar
  29. Rosenzweig, C., Parry, M. L., Fischer, G., and Frohberg, K.: 1993, Climate Change and World Food Supply, Environmental Change Unit Research Report No. 3, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Semenov, M. A. and Porter, J. R.: 1994, 'The Implications and Importance of Non-Linear Responses in Modelling of Growth and Development of Wheat’, in Grasman, J. and van Straten, G. (eds.), Predictability and Non-Linear Modelling in Natural Sciences and Economics, Wageningen.Google Scholar
  31. Semenov, M. A. and Porter, J. R.: 1995, 'Climatic Variability and the Modelling of Crop Yields’, Agric. Forest Meteor. 73, 265–283.Google Scholar
  32. Semenov, M. A., Wolf, J., Evans, L. G., Eckersten, H., and Iglesias, A.: 1996 'Comparison of Wheat Simulation Models under Climate Change. II. Application of Climate Change Scenarios’, Climate Research (in press).Google Scholar
  33. Viner, D. and Hulme, M.: 1993, The UK Met. Office High Resolution GCM Transient Experiment (UKTR), Technical Note 4 prepared for the UK Department of the Environment Climate Change Impacts/Predictive Modelling LINK, Contract Reference Number PECD 7/12/96. Climatic Research Unit, Norwich, 18 pp.Google Scholar
  34. Viner, D. and Hulme, M.: 1994, The Climate Impacts LINK Project: Providing Climate Change Scenarios for Impacts Assessment in the UK, DoE/CRU Report, Norwich.Google Scholar
  35. von Storch, H., Zorita, E., and Cubasch, U., 1993, 'Downscaling of Global Climate Change Estimates to Regional Scales: An Application to Iberian Rainfall in Wintertime’, Journal of Climate 6, 1161–1171.Google Scholar
  36. Wigley, T. M. L., Jones, P. D., Briffa, K. R., and Smith, G.: 1990, 'Obtaining Sub-Grid-Scale Information from Coarse-Resolution General Circulation Model Output’, Journal of Geophysical Research 95, 1943–1953.Google Scholar
  37. Wolf, J., Evans, L. G., Semenov, M. A., Eckersten, H., and Iglesias, A.: 1996 'Comparison of Wheat Simulation Models under Climate Change. II. Model Calibration and Sensitivity Analysis’, Climate Research (in press).Google Scholar
  38. Yevjevich, V.: 1972, 'Structural Analysis of Hydrological Time Series’, Hydrol. Pap. 56, Color. State Univ., Fort Collins, 59 pp.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.IACR-Long Ashton Research Station, Department of Agricultural SciencesUniversity of BristolBristolU.K
  2. 2.Climatic Research UnitUniversity of East AngliaNorwichU.K

Personalised recommendations