, Volume 48, Issue 2–3, pp 257–273

Bare Possibilia



Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Chandler, H.: 1976, ‘Plantinga and the Contingently Possible’, Analysis 36, 106–109.Google Scholar
  2. Cresswell, M.: 1991, ‘In Defence of the Barcan Formula’, Logique et Analyse 135-136, 271–282.Google Scholar
  3. Fine, K.: 1977, ‘Postscript’, in Prior 1977.Google Scholar
  4. Garson, J.: 1984, ‘Quantification in Modal Logic’, in Gabbay, D. and Guenthner, F. (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, Vol. II, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  5. Hughes, G. and Cresswell, M.: 1996, A New Introduction to Modal Logic, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  6. Kripke, S.: 1963, 'semantical Considerations on Modal Logic’, Acta Philosophica Fennica 16, 83–94.Google Scholar
  7. Linsky, B. and Zalta, E.: 1994, ‘In Defense of the Simplest Quantified Modal Logic’, in James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 8: Logic and Language, Ridgeview, Atascadero.Google Scholar
  8. Linsky, B. and Zalta, E.: 1996, ‘In Defense of the Contingently Nonconcrete’, Philosophical Studies 84: 283–294.Google Scholar
  9. Marcus, R. Barcan: 1946, ‘A Functional Calculus of First Order Based on Strict Implication’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 11, 1–16.Google Scholar
  10. Marcus, R. Barcan: 1985/86, ‘Possibilia and Possible Worlds’, Grazer Philosophische Studien 25–26, 107-133; reprinted in Marcus 1993.Google Scholar
  11. Marcus, R. Barcan: 1993, Modalities: Philosophical Essays, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  12. Parsons, T.: 1995, ‘Ruth Barcan Marcus and the Barcan Formula’, in Sinnott-Armstrong, Raffman and Asher 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Peacocke, C.: 1978, ‘Necessity and Truth Theories’, Journal of Philosophical Logic 7, 473–500.Google Scholar
  14. Prior, A.: 1956, ‘Modality and Quantification in S5’, The Journal of Symbolic Logic 21, 60–62.Google Scholar
  15. Prior, A.: 1957, Time and Modality, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  16. Prior, A.: 1967, Past, Present and Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Prior, A.: 1977, Worlds, Times and Selves, University of Massachusetts Press, Amherst.Google Scholar
  18. Ramsey, F.: 1927, ‘Facts and Propositions’, Aristotelian Society 7(Suppl.), 153–170.Google Scholar
  19. Salmon, N.: 1987, ‘Existence’, in James Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives 1: Metaphysics, Ridgeview, Atascadero.Google Scholar
  20. Salmon, N.: 1989, ‘The Logic of What Might Have Been’, The Philosophical Review 98, 3–34.Google Scholar
  21. Salmon, N.: 1993, ‘This Side of Paradox’, Philosophical Topics 21, 187–197.Google Scholar
  22. Sinnott-Armstrong, W., Raffman, D., and Asher, N. (eds.): 1995, Modality, Morality and Belief: Essays in Honor of Ruth Barcan Marcus, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  23. Stalnaker, R.: 1995, ‘The Interaction of Modality with Quantification and Identity’, in Sinnott-Armstrong, Raffman and Asher 1995.Google Scholar
  24. Tomberlin, J.: 1996, ‘Actualism or Possibilism?’, Philosophical Studies 84, 263–281.Google Scholar
  25. Williamson, T.: 1987/88, ‘Equivocation and Existence’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 88, 109–127.Google Scholar
  26. Williamson, T.: 1990a, Identity and Discrimination, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  27. Williamson, T.: 1990b, ‘Necessary Identity and Necessary Existence’, in Rudolf Haller and Johannes Brandl (eds.), Wittgenstein - Towards a Re-Evaluation: Proceedings of the YY14th International Wittgenstein-Symposium, Vol. I, Holder-Pichler-Tempsky, Vienna.Google Scholar
  28. Williamson, T.: 1996a, ‘The Necessity and Determinacy of Distinctness’, in Sabina Lovibond and Stephen Williams (eds.), Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, Truth and Value, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  29. Williamson, T.: 1996b, ‘Review of Sinnott-Armstrong, Raffman and Asher dy1995’, Philosophy 71, 167–172Y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Personalised recommendations