Advertisement

Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 1, pp 1–50 | Cite as

Sequence of Tense and Temporal de re

  • Dorit Abusch
Article

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abusch, D.: 1988, ‘Sequence of Tense, Intensionality and Scope’, in H. Borer (ed.), The Proceedings of the 7th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, The Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
  2. Abusch, D.: 1991, ‘The Present under Past as De Re Interpretation’, in D. Bates (ed.), The Proceedings of the 10th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, The Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
  3. Abusch, D.: 1994, ‘Sequence of Tense Revisited: Two Semantic Accounts of Tense in Intensional Contexts’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, Dyana-2 Esprit Basic research Project 6852, Deliverable R2.2.B. Shorter version appeared in P. Dekker, and M. Stokhof (eds.), Proceedings of the 9th Amsterdam Colloquium, 1993, ILLC, Dept. of Philosophy, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Abusch, D.: 1995, ‘Constraints on Tense’, Paper presented at the conference Context Dependence in the Analysis of Linguistic Meaning, February 1995, Prague.Google Scholar
  5. Cooper, R.: 1979, ‘The Interpretation of Pronouns’, in F. Heny and H. S. Schnelle (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 10: Selections from the Third Groningen Round Table, Academic Press, New York, pp. 61–92.Google Scholar
  6. Cresswell, M.: 1973, Logic and Language, Methuen, London.Google Scholar
  7. Cresswell, M. and A. von Stechow: 1982, ‘De Re Belief Generalized’, Linguistics and Philosophy 5(4), 503–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dowty, D.: 1982, ‘Tenses, Time Adverbs and Compositional Semantic Theory’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9, 405–426.Google Scholar
  9. Enç, M.: 1987, ‘Anchoring Conditions for Tense’, Linguistics Inquiry 18, 633–657.Google Scholar
  10. Evans, G.: 1980, ‘Pronouns’, Linguistic Inquiry 11.Google Scholar
  11. Heim, I.: 1994, ‘Comments on Abusch's Theory of Tense’, in H. Kamp (ed.), Ellipsis, Tense and Questions, Dyana-2 Esprit Basic Research Project 6852, Deliverable R2.2.B.Google Scholar
  12. Hinrichs, E.: 1986, ‘Temporal Anaphora in Discourse of English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1), 63–82.Google Scholar
  13. Hinrichs, E.: 1988, ‘Tense, Quantifiers and Contexts’, Computational Linguistics 14(2).Google Scholar
  14. Kamp, H.: 1979, ‘Events, Instances and Temporal Reference’, in R. Bäuerle and U. Egll (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.Google Scholar
  15. Kamp, H.: 1981, ‘Evenements, Reprentations Discoursives et Reference Temporelle’, Language 64, 39–64.Google Scholar
  16. Kamp, H. and C. Rohrer: 1984, Indirect Discourse, Manuscript, University of Texas, Austin and University of Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  17. Kaplan, D.: 1969, ‘Quantifying in’, in D. Davidson and J. Hintikka (eds.), Words and Objections, Reidel, Dordrocht.Google Scholar
  18. Ladusaw, W.: 1977, ‘Some Problems with Tenses in PTQ’, Texas Linguistic Forum 6, 89–102, University of Texas, Austin.Google Scholar
  19. Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  20. Link, G.: 1979, Montague Grammatik, Muenchen.Google Scholar
  21. Lewis, D.: 1979, ‘Attitude De Dicto and De Se’, Philosophical Review 88, 513–543.Google Scholar
  22. Nerbonne, J.: 1986, ‘Reference Time in Narration’, Linguistics and Philosophy 9(1), 83–95.Google Scholar
  23. Ogihara, T.: 1989, Temporal Reference in English and Japanese, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Texas at Austin.Google Scholar
  24. Partee, B.: 1973, ‘Some Structural Analogics Between Tenses and Pronouns in English’, The Journal of Philosophy 70, 601–609.Google Scholar
  25. Partee, B.: 1984, ‘Nominal and Temporal Anaphora’, Linguistics and Philosophy 7(3) 243–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Perry, J.: 1977, ‘Frege on Demonstratives’, Philosophical Review 86, 474–497.Google Scholar
  27. Quine, W. V. O.: 1956, ‘Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes’, The Journal of Philosophy 53, 183–194.Google Scholar
  28. Quine, W. V. O.: 1969, ‘Propositional Objects’, in W. V. O. Quine (ed.), Ontological Relativity and Other Essays, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  29. Smith, C.: 1978, ‘The Syntax and Semantics of Temporal Expressions in English’, Linguistics and Philosophy 2, 43–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stechow, von A.: 1994, Tense in Intensional Context, manuscript, Blaubeuren, October 1994.Google Scholar
  31. Stechow, von A.: 1995, ‘On the Proper Treatment of Tense’ to appear in Proceedings of Salt 5, UT, Austin.Google Scholar
  32. Stowell, T.: 1993, Syntax of Tense, manuscript, USC, April 1993.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dorit Abusch
    • 1
  1. 1.Institut für maschinelle SprachverarbeitungUniversität StuttgartStuttgartGermany

Personalised recommendations