Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 21, Issue 2, pp 159–210 | Cite as

Reciprocal Expressions and the Concept of Reciprocity

  • Mary Dalrymple
  • Makoto Kanazawa
  • Yookyung Kim
  • Sam McHombo
  • Stanley Peters


Artificial Intelligence Computational Linguistic Reciprocal Expression 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, J. L.: 1962, How To Do Things With Words, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Boolos, George: 1984, To be is to be the value of a variable (or to be some values of some variables), Journal of Philosophy, pp. 430–449.Google Scholar
  3. Colemon, Linda: 1971, 'The Case of Vanishing Presuppositions', in Proceedings of BLS 1, pp. 78–89.Google Scholar
  4. Dougherty, Ray C.: 1974, 'The Syntax and Semantics of Each Other Constructions', Foundations of Language 12, 1–47.Google Scholar
  5. Feldman, Jacob: 1995, 'Regularity-Based Perceptual Grouping', Technical Report RuCCS TR-21, Rutgers Center for Cognitive Science.Google Scholar
  6. Fiengo, Robert and Howard Lasnik: 1973, 'The Logical Structure of Reciprocal Sentences in English', Foundations of Language 9(4), 447–468.Google Scholar
  7. Grice, H. Paul: 1975, 'Logic and Conversation', in Peter Cole and Jerry I. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics 3: Speech Acts volume 3. Academic Press Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Higginbotham, James: 1980, 'Reciprocat Interpretation', Journal of Linguistic Research 1(3), 97–117.Google Scholar
  9. Kamp, Hans and Uwe Reyle: 1993, From Discourse to Logic: An Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Kanazawa, Makoto: 1994, 'Weak vs. Strong Readings of Donkey Sentences and Monotonlcity Inference in a Dynamic Setting', Linguistics and Philosophy 17(2), 109–158.Google Scholar
  11. Kański, Zbigniew: 1987, 'Logical Symmetry and Natural Language Reciprocals', in Proceedings of the 1987 Debrecen Symposion on Language and Ligic, Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó, pp. 49–68.Google Scholar
  12. Keenan, Edward L.: 1987, 'Unreducible n-ary Quantifiers in Natural Language', in Peter Gärdenfors (ed.), Generalized Quantifiers: Linguistic and Logical Approaches, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 109–150.Google Scholar
  13. Kim, Yookyung and Stanley Peters: 1995, 'Semantic and Pragmatic Context-Dependence: The Case of Reciprocals', in Teresa Galloway and Mandy Simons (eds.), The Proceedings from the Fifth Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory: SALT V, Cornell University Working Papers in Linguistics, Reprinted with corrections in Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis and David Pesetsky (eds.), Is the Best Good Enough?, Proceedings of the Workshop on Optimality in Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1997.Google Scholar
  14. Krifka, Manfred: 1995, ''Weak' and "strong' Readings of Donkey Sentences and Plural Predications', in Fritz Hamm (ed.), Recent Developments in Natural Language Semantics, Tübingen.Google Scholar
  15. Langendoen, D. Terence: 1978, 'The Logic of Reciprocity', Linguistic Inquiry 9(2), 177–197.Google Scholar
  16. Lønning, Jan Tore and Stanley Peters: 1996, 'Quantification and Collective Predicates', MS, University of Oslo and Stanford University.Google Scholar
  17. Moltmann, Friederike: 1992, 'Reciprocals and Same/Different: Towards a Semantic Analysis', Linguistics and Philosophy 15(4), 411–462.Google Scholar
  18. Moltmann, Friederike: 1995, 'Exception Sentences and Polyadic Quantification', Linguistics and Philosophy 18(3), 223–280.Google Scholar
  19. Roberts, Craige: 1987, 'Modal Subordination, Anaphora, and Distributivity', Ph.D. thesis, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
  20. Schmerling, Susan F.: 1978, 'Synonymy Judgements as Syntactic Evidence', in Peter Cole (ed.), Syntax and Semantics 9: Pragmarics, volume 9, Academic Press, New York, pp. 299–313.Google Scholar
  21. Schwarzschild, Roger: 1992, 'Types of Plural Individuals', Linguistics and Philosophy 15(6), 641–675.Google Scholar
  22. van Benthem, Johan: 1986, Essays in Logical Semantics. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  23. van Benthem, Johan: 1989, 'Polyadie Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 12(4), 437–464.Google Scholar
  24. van der Does, Jaap: 1993, 'Sums and Quantifiers', Linguistics and Philosophy 16, 509–550.Google Scholar
  25. Westerståhl, Dag: 1989, 'Quantifiers in Formal and Natural Languages', in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, volume IV, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary Dalrymple
    • 1
  • Makoto Kanazawa
    • 2
  • Yookyung Kim
    • 3
  • Sam McHombo
    • 4
  • Stanley Peters
    • 3
  1. 1.Xerox Palo Alto Research CenterUSA
  2. 2.Chiba UniversityUSA
  3. 3.Stanford UniversityUSA
  4. 4.University of California-BerkeleyUSA

Personalised recommendations