Linguistics and Philosophy

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 273–333 | Cite as

A Critique of the Minimalist Program

  • David Johnson
  • Shalom Lappin
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batwise, J. and R. Cooper: 1981, ‘Generalized Quantifiers and Natural Language’, Linguistics and Philosophy 4, 159–219.Google Scholar
  2. Belletti, A.: 1988, ‘The Case of Unaccusatives’, Linguistic Inquiry 19, 1–34.Google Scholar
  3. Brody, M.: 1995a, Logico-Lexical Form: A Radically Minimalist Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  4. Brody, M.: 1995b, ‘Perfect Syntax’, Working Papers in the Theory of Grammar, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest.Google Scholar
  5. Carpenter, B.: 1992, The Logic of Typed Feature Structures, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  6. Chomsky, N.: 1957, Syntactic Structures, Mouton, The Hague.Google Scholar
  7. Chomsky, N.: 1971, ‘Deep Structure, Surface Structure, and Semantic Interpretation’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), Semantics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 183–216.Google Scholar
  8. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1982, Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1988, Language and Problems of Knowledge, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Chomsky, N.: 1991, ‘Some Notes on Economy of Derivation and Representation’, in R. Freiden (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Syntax, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  13. Chomsky, N.: 1995a, ‘Bare Phrase Structure’, in G. Webelhuth (ed.), Government and Binding and the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  14. Chomsky, N.: 1995b, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  15. Collins, C.: 1996, Local Economy, ms., Cornell University, Ithica, NY.Google Scholar
  16. Cooper, R.: 1983, Quantification and Syntactic Theory, Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  17. Emonds, J.: 1978, ‘The Verbal Complex V'-V in French’, Linguistic Inquiry 9, 49–77.Google Scholar
  18. Fiengo, R. and R. May: 1994, Indices and Identity, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  19. Fox, D.: 1995, ‘Economy and Scope’, Natural Language Semantics 3, 283–241.Google Scholar
  20. Gazdar, G., E. Klein, G. Pullum, and I. Sag: 1985, Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  21. Ginzburg, J.: 1996, ‘Interrogatives: Questions, Facts, and Dialogue’, in S. Lappin (ed.), The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 385–422.Google Scholar
  22. Hirschbuler, P.: 1982, ‘VP Deletion and Across-the-Board Quantifier Scope’, in J. Pustejovsky and P. Sells (eds.), Proceedings of NELS 12, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  23. Huang, J.: 1982, Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Johnson, D. and P. Postal: 1980, Arc Pair Grammar, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, D. and S. Lappin: 1996a, ‘To Move or Not to Move: A Critique of Pure Minimalism’, talk given at the Third International Conference on HPSG, CNRS, Marseille, May, 1996.Google Scholar
  26. Johnson, D. and S. Lappin: 1996b, ‘Wh-Questions: Unification in a Typed Feature Structure Grammar vs Feature Checking in the Minimalist Program’, talk given at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the Israel Association for Theoretical Linguistics, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, June, 1996.Google Scholar
  27. Johnson, M.: 1988, Attribute-Value Logic and the Theory of Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 16, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  28. Kaplan, R. and J. Bresnan: 1982, ‘Lexical-Functional Grammar: A Formal System for Grammatical Representation’, in J. Bresnan (ed.), The Mental Representation of Grammatical Relations, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 173–281.Google Scholar
  29. Kasper, R. and W. Rounds: 1986, ‘A Logical Semantics for Feature Structures’, Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, New York, pp. 235–242.Google Scholar
  30. Kasper, R. and W. Rounds: 1990, ‘The Logic of Unification in Grammar’, Linguistics and Philosophy 13, 35–58.Google Scholar
  31. Kathol, A.: 1996, ‘The Syntax of wh-Quantifier Retrieval’, in R. Jonkers, E. Kaan, and A. Wiegel (eds.), Language and Cognition 5, Gronigen, pp. 101–114.Google Scholar
  32. Kay, M.: 1983, Unification Grammar, Technical Report, Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, CA.Google Scholar
  33. Keller, R.: 1993, Feature Logics, Infinitary Descriptions, and Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 44, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Keenan, E.: 1996, ‘The Semantics of Determiners’, in S. Lappin (ed.), pp. 41–63.Google Scholar
  35. Kitahara, H.: 1995, ‘Target α: Deducing Strict Cyclicity from Derivational Economy’, Linguistic Inquiry 26, 47–77.Google Scholar
  36. van de Koot, H.: 1996, ‘Strong Features, Pied-Piping, and the Overt/Covert Distinction’, UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8, University College, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Koster, J.: 1985, Domains and Dynasties, the Radical Autonomy of Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  38. Kratzer, A.: 1989, ‘Stage-Level and Individual-Level Predicates’, in E. Bach, A. Kratzer, and B. H. Partee (eds.), Papers on Quantification, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA.Google Scholar
  39. Lakoff, G.: 1970, ‘Global Rules’, Language 46, 627–639.Google Scholar
  40. Lakoff, G.: 1971, ‘On Generative Semantics’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), pp. 232–296.Google Scholar
  41. Lappin, S.: 1984, ‘VP Anaphora, Quantifier Scope, and Logical Form’, Linguistic Analysis 13, 273–315.Google Scholar
  42. Lappin, S.: 1991, ‘Concepts of Logical Form in Linguistics and Philosophy’, in A. Kasher (ed.), The Chomskyan Turn, Blackwell, Oxford, pp. 300–333.Google Scholar
  43. Lappin, S.: 1992, ‘The Syntactic Basis of Ellipsis Resolution’, in S. Berman and A. Hestvik (eds.), Proceedings of the Stuttgart Ellipsts Workshop, Arbeitspapiere des Sonderforschungsbereichs 340, Bericht Nr. 29–1992, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  44. Lappin, S.: 1993, ‘Ellipsis Resolution at S-Structure’, in Amy Schafer (ed.), Proceedings of NELS 23, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA., pp. 255–269.Google Scholar
  45. Lappin, S.: 1996a, ‘The Interpretation of Ellipsis'’, in S. Lappin (ed.), pp. 145–175.Google Scholar
  46. Lappin S. (ed.): 1996b, The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  47. Lappin, S.: forthcoming, ‘Generalized Quantifiers, Exception Phrases, and Logicality’, Journal of Semantics.Google Scholar
  48. Lasnik, H.: 1993, Lectures on Minimalist Syntax, ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
  49. Lasnik, H.: 1994, Last Resort, ms., University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar
  50. Lobeck, A.: 1995, Ellipsis, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  51. McCawley, J.: 1971, ‘Where do Noun Phrases Come From’, in D. Steinberg and L. Jakobovits (eds.), pp. 217–231.Google Scholar
  52. Marantz, A.: 1995, ‘The Minimalist Program’, in Webelhuth (ed.), pp. 351–382.Google Scholar
  53. May, R.: 1985, Logical Form, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  54. Ouhalla, J.: Remarks on the Binding Properties of Wh-in Situ, ms., Queen Mary and Westfield College, University of London.Google Scholar
  55. Pereira, F.: 1990, ‘Categorial Semantics and Scoping’, Compatational Linguistics 16, 1–10.Google Scholar
  56. Perlmutter, D. (ed.): 1983, Studies in Relational Grammar 1, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  57. Perlmutter, D. and C. Rosen (eds.): Studies in Relational Grammar 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  58. Pollard, C. and I. Sag: 1987, Information Based Syntax, CSLI Lecture Notes 13, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  59. Pollard, C. and I. Sag: 1994, Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  60. Pollard, C. and E. J. Yoo: 1996, Quantifiers, Wh-Phrases and a Theory of Argument Selection, ms., Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.Google Scholar
  61. Pollock, J. Y.: 1989, ‘Verb Movement, Universal Grammar, and the Structure of IP’, Linguistic Inquiry, 20, 365–424.Google Scholar
  62. Postal, P.: 1972, ‘The Best Theory’, in P. Peters (ed.), Goals of Linguistic Theory, Englewood Cliffs, New York, pp. 131–170.Google Scholar
  63. Pullum, G.: 1996, ‘Nostalgic View from Building 20’, Journal of Linguistics 32, 137–147.Google Scholar
  64. Reinhart, T.: 1993, ‘Wh-in-situ in the Framework of the Minimalist Program’, Lecture at the Utrecht Linguistics Colloquium.Google Scholar
  65. Reinhart, T.: 1995, Interface Strategies, OTS Working Papers, University of Utrecht, Utrecht.Google Scholar
  66. Rizzi, L.: 1982, Issues in Italian Syntax, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  67. Rogers, J.: 1994, Studies in the Logic of Trees with Applications to Grammar Formalisms, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
  68. Rounds, W.: forthcoming, ‘Feature Logic’, in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, North Holland, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  69. Sag, I.: 1976, Deletion and Logical Form, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  70. Sag, I.: forthcoming, ‘English Relative Clause Constructions’, Journal of Linguistics.Google Scholar
  71. Shieber, S.: 1986, Unification-Based Approaches to Grammar, CSLI Lecture Notes 4, Stanford, CA.Google Scholar
  72. Shieber, S.: 1992, Constraint-Based Grammar Formalisms, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  73. Shieber, S., H. Uszkoreit, F. Pereira, J. Robinson, and M. Tyson: 1983, ‘The Formalism and Implementation of PATR-II’, in Research on Interactive Acquisition and Use of Knowledge, SRI, Menlo Park, CA.Google Scholar
  74. Simpson, A.: 1995, Wh Movement, Licensing, and the Locality of Feature-Checking, unpublished Ph.D dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.Google Scholar
  75. Stabler, E.: 1992, The Logical Approach to Syntax, Bradford Books, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  76. Steinberg D. and L. Jakobovits (eds.): 1971, Semantics, Cambridge University Press, CambrigeGoogle Scholar
  77. Uszkoreit, H.: 1986, ‘Categorial Unification Grammar’, Proceedings of COLING-86, pp. 187–194.Google Scholar
  78. Wahba, W. A-F. B.: 1991, ‘LF Movement in Iraqi Arabic’, in C.-T.J. Huang and R. May (eds.), Logical Structure and Linguistic Structure, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
  79. Westerstahl, D.: 1989, ‘Quantifiers in Formal and Natural Languages’, in D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic IV, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 1–131.Google Scholar
  80. Webelhuth, G. (ed.): 1995, Government and Binding and the Minimalist Program, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  81. Williams, E.: 1977, ‘Discourse and Logical Form’, Linguistic Inquiry 8, 101–139.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Johnson
  • Shalom Lappin

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations