Climatic Change

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 643–666 | Cite as

Human Dimensions of Climate Change: Cultural Theory and Collective Action

  • Curtis A. Pendergraft


Mobilizing collective action to cope with climate change is difficult at any level, but the larger the ‘community’ the more difficult the task. How to achieve cooperation in the common interest without imposing excessive governmental coercion is a fundamental political conundrum. Using the cultural typology suggested by Cultural Theory (CT), this paper explores diverse worldviews that inform individual and collective attitudes relevant to climate change. Responses from a sample of 441 individuals to statements drawn from the public discourse on environmental issues are used to classify respondents according to the cultural types posited by CT. Analysis indicates that most respondents mix elements of CT's egalitarianism, hierarchy, and individualism, though many individuals clearly lean toward one or another of the cultural types. There seems to be a melding of individualistic and hierarchic elements in opposition to egalitarian elements. Definitions of what is natural, fair and right – of equity – are fundamental issues between cultures, and non-coercive resolution of issues may be promoted by exploring cultural interstices, where cosmological boundaries are weakest. The cultural typology used in Cultural Theory, less spatially or temporally bound than some other typologies, promises to be a useful analytic tool in exploring cultural differences and overlaps.


Climate Change Posit Analytic Tool Collective Action Cultural Difference 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Brown, L.: 1996, State of the World, 1996, Worldwatch Institute, New York.Google Scholar
  2. Burnheim, J.: 1997, ‘Secession, Structures and Power-Trading’, The Good Society 7(1) (Winter), 30-33.Google Scholar
  3. Converse, P.: 1964, ‘The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics’, in Apter, D. E. (ed.), Ideology and Discontent, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Coyle, D. J. and Ellis, R. J. (ed.): 1994, Politics, Policy and Culture, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  5. Coyle, D. J.: 1994, ‘“This Land is Your Land, This Land is My Land”: Cultural Conflict in Environmental and Land-Use Regulation’, in Coyle, D. J. and Ellis, R. J. (eds.), Politics, Policy, and Culture, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  6. Cotgrove, S.: 1982, Catastrophe or Cornucopia: The Environment, Politics and the Future, Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  7. Dake, K.: 1992, ‘Myths of Nature: Culture and the Social Construction of Risk’, J. Social Issues 48(4), 21-37.Google Scholar
  8. Dake, K. and Wildavsky, A.: 1990, ‘Theories of Risk Perception: Who Fears What and Why?’, Daedalus 119(Fall): 41-60.Google Scholar
  9. Douglas, M.: 1970, Natural Symbols: Explorations in Cosmology, Barie and Rockliff, London.Google Scholar
  10. Douglas, M.: 1986, How Institutions Think, Syracuse University Press, Syracuse.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, M. (ed.): 1982, Essays in the Sociology of Perception, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, M. and Wildavsky, A.: 1982, Risk and Culture, University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  13. Elazar, D. J.: 1972, American Federalism: A View from the States, 2nd edn., Thomas Y. Crowell Company, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, R. J.: 1993, American Political Cultures, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  15. Gross, J. L. and Rayner, S.: 1985, Measuring Culture: A Paradigm for the Analysis of Social Organization, Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  16. Hayek, F. A.: 1978, New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  17. Huber, J. D.: 1989, ‘Values and Partisanship in Left-Right Orientations: Measuring Ideology’, Europ. J. Polit. Res. 17, 599-562.Google Scholar
  18. Inglehart, R.: 1990, Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Jaeger, C., Durrenberger, G., Kastenholz, H., and Truffer, B.: 1993, ‘Determinants of Environmental Actions with Regard to Climatic Change’, Clim. Change 23, 193-211.Google Scholar
  20. Klingemann, H.: 1979, ‘Measuring Ideological Conceptualizations’, in Barnes, S. H. and Kaase, M. (ed.), Political Action, Sage, Beverly Hills.Google Scholar
  21. Keohane, R. O. and Nye, J. S., Jr.: 1977, Power and Interdependence: World Politics in Transition, Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  22. Lazarsfeld, P. F. and Henry, N. W.: 1968, Latent Structure Analysis, Houghton Mifflin, Boston.Google Scholar
  23. Linz, J. J.: 1975, ‘Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes’, in Greenstein, F. I. and Polsby, N. W. (eds.), Handbook of Political Science, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.Google Scholar
  24. Morgenthau, H. J.: 1967, Politics Among Nations: The Struggle for Power and Peace, 4th edn., Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Olson, M.: 1982, The Rise and Decline of Nations: Economic Growth, Stagflation, and Social Rigidities, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  26. Page, B. I. and Shapiro, R. Y.: 1992, The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans’ Policy Preferences, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  27. Rayner, S.: 1984, ‘Disagreeing About Risk: The Institutional Cultures of Risk Management and Planning for Future Generations’, in Hadden, S. G. (ed.), Risk Analysis, Institutions, and Public Policy, Associated Faculty Press, Port Washington, NY.Google Scholar
  28. Samdahl, D. and Robertson, R.: 1989. ‘Social Determinants of Environmental Concern: Specification and Test of the Model’, Environment and Behavior 1, 57-81.Google Scholar
  29. Serageldin, I.: 1996, ‘Sustainable Development: From Theory to Practice’, Finance Develop. 33(4) (December), 3.Google Scholar
  30. Schama, S.: 1995, Landscape and Memory, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Schwarz, M. and Thompson, M.: 1990, Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice, Hemel Hempstead, Harvester-Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  32. Stehr, N. and von Storch, H.: 1995, ‘The Social Construct of Climate and Climate Change’, Clim. Res. 5, 99-105.Google Scholar
  33. Stimson, J. A.: 1991, Public Opinion in America: Moods, Cycles, and Swings, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  34. Thompson, M.: 1984, ‘Among the Energy Tribes: A Cultural Framework for the Analysis and Design of Energy Policy’, Pol. Sci. 17, 321-339.Google Scholar
  35. Thompson, M., Ellis, R., and Wildavsky, A.: 1990, Cultural Theory, Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  36. Thompson, P. B. and Dean, W.: 1996, ‘Comparing Conceptions of Risk’, Risk: Health, Safety Environ. 7(4), 361-384.Google Scholar
  37. Times Mirror: 1987, The People Press and Politics, The Times Mirror Company, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  38. Triandis, H.: 1988, ‘Collectivism v. Individualism: A Reconceptualisation of a Basic Concept in Cross-Cultural Social Psychology’, in Verma, Gajendra K. and Bagley, Christopher (eds.), Cross-Cultural Studies of Personality, Attitudes and Cognition, MacMillan Press, London.Google Scholar
  39. Unger, R. M.: 1987, Plasticity Into Power: Comparative-Historical Studies on the Institutional Conditions of Economic and Military Success, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  40. Wilson, J. Q.: 1993, The Moral Sense, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Wiman, I.: 1990, ‘Expecting the Unexpected: Some Ancient Roots to Current Perceptions of Nature’, Ambio 19(2), 62-69.Google Scholar
  42. World Commission on Environment and Development: 1987, Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Curtis A. Pendergraft
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political ScienceTulane UniversityColorado SpringsU.S.A

Personalised recommendations