, Volume 48, Issue 2–3, pp 233–250 | Cite as




Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Austin, J. L.: 1962, Sense and Sensibilia Clarendon Press, Oxford, p. 68 n.Google Scholar
  2. Davidson, D. and Harman, G. (eds.): 1972, Semantics of Natural Language, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  3. LePore, E. and R. Van Gulick (eds.): 1990, John Searle and His Critics, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Lewis, D.: 1972, ‘General Semantics’, in Davidson and Harman, 1972, 169–218.Google Scholar
  5. Lewis, D. and Lewis, S.: 1970, ‘Holes’, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 48, 206–212.Google Scholar
  6. Parsons, T.: 1980, Nonexistent Objects, Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  7. Parsons, T.: 1982 ‘Are There Nonexistent Objects?’, American Philosophical Quarterly 19, 365–371.Google Scholar
  8. Quine, W. V.: 1940, Mathematical Logic, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp. 65–71.Google Scholar
  9. Quine, W. V.: 1951, ‘On Carnap's Views on Ontology’, Philosophical Studies 2, 65–72.Google Scholar
  10. Quine, W. V.: 1960, Word and Object, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., p. 231.Google Scholar
  11. Quine, W. V.: 1966, Elementary Logic (Revised edition), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
  12. Ryle, G.: 1949, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London, p. 23.Google Scholar
  13. Van Inwagen, P.: 1990, ‘Searle on Ontological Commitment’, in LePore and Van Gulick, 345–358.Google Scholar
  14. Venclova, T.: 1983, ‘The Game of the Soviet Censor’, New York Review of Books, 31 March 1983, 34–37.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Personalised recommendations