Climatic Change

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 621–642 | Cite as

Structural and Process History of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change

  • Shardul Agrawala
Article

Abstract

In the nine years since its establishment in 1988, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has attempted to walk the tightrope of being scientifically sound and politically acceptable. This paper investigates how the IPCC has evolved over two assessment cycles. It provides an in-depth examination of important characteristics of the IPCC process including the peer review mechanism, participation of developing countries, and its interactions with the intergovernmental negotiation process on climate change.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acosta-Moreno, R.: 1997, Interview with Author, Bonn, Germany, 4 March.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawala, S.: 1998, ‘Context and Early Origins of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Clim. Change 39, 605-620.Google Scholar
  3. Bodansky, D.: 1994. ‘Prologue to the Climate Change Convention’, in Mintzer, I. and Leonard, J. A. (eds.), Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, Cambridge University Press, pp. 45-74.Google Scholar
  4. Boehmer-Christiansen, S.: 1994a, ‘Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Advice, Part 1’, Glob. Environ. Change, 4(2), 140-159.Google Scholar
  5. Boehmer-Christiansen, S.: 1994b, ‘Global Climate Protection Policy: The Limits of Scientific Advice, Part 2’, Glob. Environ. Change, 4(3), 185-200.Google Scholar
  6. Boehmer-Christiansen, S. and Skea, J. F.: 1994c, ‘The Operation and Impact of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Results of a Survey of Participants and Users’, Governing Our Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark, 16-18 November.Google Scholar
  7. Bolin, B.: 1997, Interview with Author, Stockholm, Sweden, 6 March.Google Scholar
  8. Borione, D. and Ripert, J.: 1994, ‘Exercising Common but Differentiated Responsibility’, in Mintzer, I. and Leonard, J. A. (eds.), Negotiating Climate Change: The Inside Story of the Rio Convention, Cambridge University Press, pp. 77-96.Google Scholar
  9. Brenton, T.: 1994, The Greening of Machiavelli: The Evolution of International Environmental Politics, Earthscan Publications, London.Google Scholar
  10. Estrada-Oyela, R.: 1993, Letter to IPCC Chairman Bert Bolin, INC, Geneva, 13 March.Google Scholar
  11. Estrada-Oyela, R.: 1994, Speech at Royal Geographic Society, London, 31 May.Google Scholar
  12. Fitzgerald, J.: 1990, ‘The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Taking the First Steps Towards a Global Response’, Southern Illinois Law Journal 14, 231-254.Google Scholar
  13. IPCC: 1988, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the First Session, WCP TD-No. 267, Geneva, 9-11 November.Google Scholar
  14. IPCC: 1989, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the First Session of the IPCC Bureau, WCP TD-No. 294, Geneva, 6-7 February.Google Scholar
  15. IPCC: 1990a, Policymaker Summary of the IPCC Special Committee on the Participation of Developing Countries, IPCC, August.Google Scholar
  16. IPCC: 1990b, WMO/UNEP Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the Second Session of the IPCC Bureau.Google Scholar
  17. IPCC: 1991, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: Report of the Fourth Session of the IPCC Bureau.Google Scholar
  18. IPCC: 1992, Report of the Eighth Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Harare, Zimbabwe, November.Google Scholar
  19. IPCC: 1993, Report of the Ninth Session of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland, August.Google Scholar
  20. Jäger, J. (ed.): 1988, Developing Policies for Responding to Climatic Change, WCIP-1, WMO/TD No. 225, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva.Google Scholar
  21. Jefferson, M.: 1996, Climate Change 1995: The IPCC Second Assessment Reviewed, Report No. 5, World Energy Council, London, March.Google Scholar
  22. Linden, H.: 1993, ‘A Dissenting View on Global Climate Change’, Electricity Journal, July.Google Scholar
  23. Lindzen, R.: 1992, The Origin of Alleged Scientific Consensus, Proceedings of the OPEC Seminar on the Environment, Vienna, April 13-15.Google Scholar
  24. Meyer, A. and Cooper, T.: 1995, ‘A Recalculation of the Social Costs of Climate Change’, Occasional Paper, Global Commons Institute London, July.Google Scholar
  25. Moss, R.: 1994, ‘Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Human Dimensions Quarterly 1(2).Google Scholar
  26. Nakicenovic, N.: 1997, Discussion with Harvard Global Environmental Assessment Fellows, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria, 24 January.Google Scholar
  27. Obasi, G. O. P.: 1988. Letter to WMO Member Governments, WMO, Geneva, 25 March.Google Scholar
  28. Pearce, D. W., Cline, W. R. et al.: 1995, The Social Costs of Climate Change: Greenhouse Damage and the Benefits of Control, June 1995 Draft Chapter for IPCC Working Group III Second Assessment Report.Google Scholar
  29. Ripert, J.: 1997, Interview with Author, Paris, France, 14 March.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, S.: 1991, ‘Three Reports of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’, Environment 33(1), 25-30.Google Scholar
  31. Singer, S. F.: 1996. ‘A Preliminary Critique of IPCC’s Second Assessment of Climate Change’, The Global Warming Debate: The Report of the European Science and Environment Forum, ESEF, London, pp. 146-156.Google Scholar
  32. The New Scientist: 1994, ‘Frankenstein Syndrome Hits Climate Treaty’, The New Scientist, 11 June.Google Scholar
  33. UNGA: 1989, Protection of Global Climate for Present and Future Generations of Mankind, Resolution 43/53 adopted by the United Nations General Assembly, New York City, 27 January.Google Scholar
  34. Usher, P.: 1997, Interview with Author, Bonn, Germany, 4 March.Google Scholar
  35. Watson, R. T.: 1997, White Paper on the Third Assessment Report of the IPCC, IPCC, Washington, D.C., 28 May.Google Scholar
  36. Wirth, T.: 1997, Comments at Center for Science and International Affairs, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, 10 April.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shardul Agrawala
    • 1
  1. 1.Science, Technology and Environmental Policy Program, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International AffairsPrinceton UniversityPrincetonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations