Journal of Psycholinguistic Research

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 3–20 | Cite as

Misinterpretations of Garden-Path Sentences: Implications for Models of Sentence Processing and Reanalysis

  • Fernanda FerreiraEmail author
  • Kiel Christianson
  • Andrew Hollingworth


Theories of sentence comprehension have addressed both initial parsing processes and mechanisms responsible for reanalysis. Three experiments are summarized that were designed to investigate the reanalysis and interpretation of relatively difficult garden-path sentences (e.g., While Anna dressed the baby spit up on the bed). After reading such sentences, participants correctly believed that the baby spit up on the bed; however, they often confidently, yet incorrectly, believed that Anna dressed the baby. These results demonstrate that garden-path reanalysis is not an all-or-nothing process and that thematic roles initially assigned for the subordinate clause verb are not consistently revised. The implications of the partial reanalysis phenomenon for Fodor and Inoue's (1998) model of reanalysis and sentence processing are discussed. In addition, we discuss the possibility that language processing often creates “good enough” structures rather than ideal structures.

parsing reanalysis semantics syntactic ambiguity 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barton, S. B., & Sanford, A. J. (1993). A case study of anomaly detection: Shallow semantic processing and cohesion establishment. Memory and Cognition, 21, 477-487.Google Scholar
  2. Chomsky, N. (1986). Knowledge of Language. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
  3. Christianson, K., Hollingworth A., Halliwell, J., & Ferreira, F. (in press). Thematic roles assigned along the garden path linger. Cognitive Psychology.Google Scholar
  4. Clifton, C., Jr. (1993). Thematic roles in sentence parsing. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 222-246.Google Scholar
  5. Erickson, T. D., & Mattson, M. E. (1981). From words to meaning: A semantic illusion. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 20, 540-551.Google Scholar
  6. Ferreira, F., & Stacey, J. (submitted). The misinterpretation of passive sentences.Google Scholar
  7. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1991). Recovery from misanalyses of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 725-745.Google Scholar
  8. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1998). Syntactic reanalysis, thematic processing, and sentence comprehension. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 73-100). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  9. Ferreira, F., & Henderson, J. M. (1999). Good enough representations in visual cognition and language. Paper presented at Architectures and Mechanisms of Language Processing Conference, Edinburgh, Scotland.Google Scholar
  10. Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (1998). Attach anyway. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 101-141). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  11. Frazier, L., & Clifton, C., Jr. (1998). Sentence reanalysis and visibility. In J. D. Fodor & F. Ferreira (Eds.), Reanalysis in sentence processing (pp. 143-176). Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  12. Frazier, L., & Fodor, J.D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 1-34.Google Scholar
  13. Grice, P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics, Vol. III: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  14. Pritchett, B. L. (1992). Grammatical competence and parsing performance. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  15. Rayner, K., Garrod, S., & Perfetti, C. A. (1992). Discourse influences during parsing are delayed. Cognition, 45, 109-139.Google Scholar
  16. Warner, J., & Glass, A. L. (1987). Context and distance-to-disambiguation effects in ambiguity resolution: Evidence from grammaticality judgments of garden-path sentences. Journal of Memory and Language, 26, 714-738.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2001

Authors and Affiliations

  • Fernanda Ferreira
    • 1
    Email author
  • Kiel Christianson
    • 1
  • Andrew Hollingworth
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of LinguisticsMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing
  3. 3.Cognitive Science ProgramMichigan State UniversityEast Lansing

Personalised recommendations