Transportation

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 363–390

Analysis of Metropolitan Highway Capacity and the growth in vehicle miles of travel

  • Robert B. Noland
  • William A. Cowart

Abstract

A number of recent studies have examined the hypothesis of induced travel in an attempt to quantify the phenomenon (Hansen & Huang 1997; Noland, forthcoming). No study has yet attempted to adjust for potential simultaneity bias in the results. This study addresses this issue by the use of an instrumental variable (two stage least squares) approach. Metropolitan level data compiled by the Texas Transportation Institute for their annual congestion report is used in the analysis and urbanized land area is used as an instrument for lane miles of capacity. While this is not an ideal instrument, results still suggest a strong causal relationship but probably that most previous work has had an upward bias in the coefficient estimates. The effect of lane mile additions on VMT growth is forecast and found to account for about 15% of annual VMT growth with substantial variation between metropolitan areas. This effect appears to be closely correlated with percent growth in lane miles, suggesting that rapidly growing areas can attribute a greater share of their VMT growth to growth in lane miles.

highway capacity induced travel modelling transportation demand transportation policy 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnott R & Small K (1994) The economics of traffic congestion. American Scientist 82 (Sept./ Oct.).Google Scholar
  2. DeCorla-Souza P & Cohen H (1998) Accounting for Induced Travel in Evaluation of Urban Highway Expansion, FHWA, workshop paper electronically published at www.ota.fhwa.dot.gov/steam/doc.htm.Google Scholar
  3. Delucchi M (1997) Annualized Social Cost of Motor Vehicle Use in the United States, Based on 1990-1991 Data, Vol. 1-23, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis, UCD-ITS-RR-96-3, 1996-97.Google Scholar
  4. Goodwin P (1996) Empirical evidence on induced traffic. Transportation 23(1) (Feb.), 35-54.Google Scholar
  5. Hansen M & Huang Y-L (1997) Road supply and traffic in California urban areas. Transportation Research A 31, 205-218.Google Scholar
  6. Heanue K (1998) Highway capacity and induced travel: Issues, evidence and implications, Transportation Research Circular, no. 481, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council.Google Scholar
  7. Johnston R & Ceerla R (1996) The effects of new high-occupancy vehicle lanes on travel and emissions. Transportation Research 30A(1), 35-50.Google Scholar
  8. Johnston J (1984) Econometric Methods, 3rd edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Johnston J & DiNardo J (1997) Econometric Methods, 4th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Mackie P (1996) Induced traffic and economic appraisal. Transportation 23.Google Scholar
  11. Noland RB (forthcoming) Relationships between highway capacity and induced vehicle travel. Transportation Research A.Google Scholar
  12. Schrank DL & Lomax TJ (1997) Urban Roadway Congestion - 1982 to 1994, Volume 2:Methodology and Urbanized Area Data, Research Report 1131-9, Texas Transportation Institute, College Station, TX.Google Scholar
  13. Standing Advisory Committee on Trunk Road Assessment, Department of Transport (UK) (1994) Trunk Roads and the Generation of Traffic, HMSO, London.Google Scholar
  14. US DOT, Federal Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration (1997) Condition and Performance: 1997 Status of the Nation's Surface Transportation System, Report to Congress, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  15. Zahavi Y & Ryan JM (1980) Stability of travel components over time. Transportation Research Record 750, 19-26.Google Scholar
  16. Zahavi Y & Talvitie A (1980) Regularities in travel time and money expenditures. Transportation Research Record 750, 13-19.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robert B. Noland
    • 1
  • William A. Cowart
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Transport Studies, Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringImperial College of Science, Technology and MedicineLondonUnited Kingdom
  2. 2.2ICF ConsultingFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations