It is always possible to construct a real function φ, given random quantities X and Y with continuous distribution functions F and G, respectively, in such a way that φ(X) and φ(Y), also random quantities, have both the same distribution function, say H. This result of De Finetti introduces an alternative way to somehow describe the `opinion' of a group of experts about a continuous random quantity by the construction of Fields of coincidence of opinions (FCO). A Field of coincidence of opinions is a finite union of intervals where the opinions of the experts coincide with respect to that quantity of interest. We speculate on (dis)advantages of Fields of Opinion compared to usual `probability' measures of a group and on their relation with a continuous version of the well-known Allais' paradox.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Allais, M. & Hagen, O. (1979), Expected Utility Hypotheses and the Allais' Paradox. (D. Reidel Publishing Company).Google Scholar
- Arrow, K.J. (1951), Social Choice and Individual Values, Second Edition, (Yale University Press).Google Scholar
- Barlow, R.E. (1992), Introduction to De Finetti (1937) Foresight: Its Logical Laws, Its Subjective Sources, in S. Kotz and N.L. Johnson (eds.), Breakthroughs in Statistics, Volume I (Springer Verlag).Google Scholar
- Cifarelli, D.M. & Regazzini, E. (1996), De Finetti's contribution to probability and statistics, Statistical Science 11(4): 253–282.Google Scholar
- Dawid A. P. (1982), Intersubjective statistical models, in G. Koch and F. Spizzichino (eds.), Exchangeability in Probability and Statistics (North-Holland, Amsterdam).Google Scholar
- de Finetti, B. (1953), Trasformazioni di Numeri Aleatori atte a far coincidere distribuzioni diverse, Giornale Dell'Istituto Italiano Degli Attuari, XVI, pp. 51–57.Google Scholar
- Esteves, L.G. (1997), Coincidence of Distributions by a Transformation of de Finetti, Dissertation. Universidade de S. Paulo, Department of Statistics (in Portuguese).Google Scholar
- Genest, C. & Zidek, J.V. (1986), Combining Probability Distributions: a critique and an annotated bibliography, Statistical Science 1(1): 114–148.Google Scholar
- Nau, R.F. (1992), Joint coherence in games of incomplete information, Management Science 38(3): 374–387.Google Scholar
- Nau, R.F. (1995), The incoherence of agreeing to disagree, Theory and Decision 39: 219–239.Google Scholar
- Savage, L.J. (1954), The Foundations of Statistics, Second Edition (Dover Publications).Google Scholar
- Wechsler, S. (1993), Exchangeability and Predictivism, Erkenntnis 38(3): 343–350.Google Scholar