Synthese

, Volume 122, Issue 3, pp 321–335

Truthlikeness, Rationality And Scientific Method

  • Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla
Article

Abstract

I. A. Kieseppä's criticism of the methodological use of the theory of verisimilitude, and D. B. Resnik's arguments against the explanation of scientific method by appeal to scientific aims are critically considered. Since the notion of verisimilitude was introduced as an attempt to show that science can be seen as a rational enterprise in the pursuit of truth, defenders of the verisimilitude programme need to show that scientific norms can be interpreted (at least in principle) as rules that try to increase the degree of truthlikeness of scientific theories. This possibility is explored for several approaches to the problem of verisimilitude.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kieseppäa', I.: 1996, 'On the Aim of the Theory of Verisimilitude', Synthese 107, 421–438.Google Scholar
  2. Kitcher, P.: 1993, The Advancement of Science, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Kuipers, T. A. F. (ed.): 1987, What is Closer-to-the-Truth?, Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  4. Kuipers, T. A. F.: 1992, 'Naive and Refined Truth Approximation', Synthese 93, 299–341.Google Scholar
  5. Kuipers, T A. F.: 1996, 'Truth Approximation by the Hypothetico-Deductive Method', in W. Balzer and C. U. Moulines (eds.), Structuralist Theory of Science. Focal Issues, New Results, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 83–113.Google Scholar
  6. Laudan, L.: 1981, 'A Confutation of Convergent Realism', Philosophy of Science 48, 19–49.Google Scholar
  7. Laudan, L.: 1984, Science and Values: The Aims of Science and Their Role in Scientific Debate, University of California Press, Berkeley, CA.Google Scholar
  8. Mäaki, U.: 1994, 'Reorienting the Assumptions Issue', in R. E. Backhouse (ed.), New Directions in Economic Methodology, Routledge, London, pp. 236–256.Google Scholar
  9. Mäaki, U.: 1998, 'The Way the World Works (WWW). Towards An Ontology of Theory Choice', munpublished manuscript, Erasmus University, Rotterdam (forthcoming in U. Mäaki (ed.), The Economic World View. Studies in the Ontology of Economics, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Miller, D.: 1975, 'The Accuracy of Predictions', Synthese 30, 159–91.Google Scholar
  11. Newton-Smith, W. H.: 1981, The Rationality of Science, Routledge and Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  12. Niiniluoto, I.: 1987, Truthlikeness, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  13. Niiniluoto, I.: 1998, 'Verisimilitude: The Third Period', The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 9, 1–29.Google Scholar
  14. Nowak, L.: 1980, The Structure of Idealisation: Towards a Systematic Interpretation of the Marxian Idea of Science, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  15. Oddie, C.: 1986, Likeness to Truth, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  16. Popper, K. R.: 1963, Conjectures and Refutations, Routledge, London.Google Scholar
  17. Popper, K. R.: 1972, Objective Knowledge, The Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. Resnik, D. B.: 1993, 'Do Scientific Aims Justify Methodological Rules?', Erkenntnis 38, 223–32.Google Scholar
  19. Simon, H.: 1982, Models of Bounded Rationality, 2 vols., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  20. Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1992, 'Truthlikeness Without Truth: A Methodological Approach', Synthese 93, 343–72.Google Scholar
  21. Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1996a, 'Verisimilitude, Structuralism and Scientific Progress', Erkenntnis 44, 25–47.Google Scholar
  22. Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1996b, Mentiras a medias. Unas investigaciones sobre el programa de la verosimilitud, Ediciones de la Universidad Autóonoma de Madrid, Madrid.Google Scholar
  23. Zamora Bonilla, J. P.: 1997, 'An Invitation to Methodonomics', in A. Ibarra and T. Mormann (eds), Representations of Scientific Rationality, Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp. 233–51.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jesus P. Zamora Bonilla
    • 1
  1. 1.Departamento de EconomíaUniversidad Carlos IIIGetafe. MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations