Advertisement

Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 116, Issue 1–2, pp 5–32 | Cite as

The Global Exposure of Forests to Air Pollutants

  • David Fowler
  • J. Neil Cape
  • Mhairi Coyle
  • Chris Flechard
  • Johan Kuylenstierna
  • Kevin Hicks
  • Dick Derwent
  • Colin Johnson
  • David Stevenson
Article

Abstract

The tall, aerodynamically rough surfaces of forests provide for the efficient exchange of heat and momentum between terrestrial surfaces and the atmosphere. The same properties of forests also provide for large potential rates of deposition of pollutant gases, aerosols and cloud droplets. For some reactive pollutant gases, including SO2, HNO3 and NH3, rates of deposition may be large and substantially larger than onto shorter vegetation and is the cause of the so called "filtering effect" of forest canopies. Pollutant inputs to moorland and forest have been compared using measured ambient concentrations from an unpolluted site in southern Scotland and a more polluted site in south eastern Germany. The inputs of S and N to forest at the Scottish site exceed moorland by 16% and 31% respectively with inputs of 7.3 kg S ha-1 y and 10.6 kg N ha-1 y-1. At the continental site inputs to the forest were 43% and 48% larger than over moorland for S and N deposition with totals of 53.6 kg S ha-1 y-1 and 69.5 kg N ha-1 y-1 respectively.

The inputs of acidity to global forests show that in 1985 most of the areas receiving > 1 kg H+ ha-1 y-1 as S are in the temperate latitudes, with 8% of total global forest exceeding this threshold. By 2050, 17% of global forest will be receiving > 1 kg H-1 ha-1 as S and most of the increase is in tropical and sub-tropical countries.

Forests throughout the world are also exposed to elevated concentrations of ozone. Taking 60 ppb O3 as a concentration likely to be phytotoxic to sensitive forest species, a global model has been used to simulate the global exposure of forests to potentially phytotoxic O3 concentrations for the years 1860, 1950, 1970, 1990 and 2100. The model shows no exposure to concentrations in excess of 60 ppb in 1860, and of the 6% of global forest exposed to concentrations > 60 ppb in 1950, 75% were in temperate latitudes and 25% in the tropics. By 1990 24% of global forest is exposed to O3 concentrates > 60 ppb, and this increases to almost 50% of global forest by 2100. While the uncertainty in the future pollution climate of global forest is considerable, the likely impact of O3 and acid deposition is even more difficult to assess because of interactions between these pollutants and substantial changes in ambient CO2 concentration, N deposition and climate over the same period, but the effects are unlikely to be beneficial overall.

acid deposition ozone forests nitrogen deposition pollution climate 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Beswick, K.M., Hargreaves, K.J., Gallagher, M.W., Choularton, T.W. and Fowler, D.: 1991, Size resolved measurements of cloud droplet deposition velocity to a forest canopy using an eddy correlation technique. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 117: 623-645.Google Scholar
  2. Cannell, M.G.R., Thornley, J.H.M., Mobbs, D.C. and Friend, A.D.: 1997, UK conifer forests may be growing faster in response to increased N deposition, atmospheric CO 2 and temperature, Forestry, Vol. 71, No. 4.Google Scholar
  3. Cape, J.N., Leith, I.D., Fowler, D., Murray, M.B., Sheppard, L.J., Eamus, D. and Wilson. R.H.F.: 1991, New Phytol, 118: 119-126.Google Scholar
  4. Chamberlain, A.C.: 1960, Aspects of the deposition of radioactive and other gases and particles. nt. J. Air Pollut. 3: 63-88.Google Scholar
  5. Chamberlain, A.C.: 1975, The movement of particles in plant communities. In Vegetation and the Atmosphere, Volume I Principles, ed. J.L. Monteith, 155-203. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  6. Chappelka, A.H. Samuelson, I.J.:1998, Ambient ozone effects on forest trees of the eastern United States: a review. New Phytol. 139:91-108.Google Scholar
  7. Collins, W.J., Stevenson, D.S., Johnson, C.E. and Derwent, R.G..: 1997, Tropospheric ozone in a global-scale three-dimensional Lagrangian model and its response to NO, emission controls. Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry 26: 223-274.Google Scholar
  8. Crossley, A., Wilson, D.B. & Milne, R.:1992, Pollution in the upland environment. Environ. Pollut. 75, 81-88.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutzen, P., Brost, B., Dentener, F., Feichter, H., Hein, R., Kanakidou, M., Lelieveld, J. & Zimmermann, P.: 1997, Development of a time-dependent global tropospheric air chemistry model "GLOMAC" based on the weather forecast of the "ECMWF". In: Tropospheric Modelling and Emission Estimation, eds. A. Ebel, R Friedrich & H Rodhe, 380-391. Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidleberg New York.Google Scholar
  10. DeHayes, D.H.: 1992, Winter Injury and Developmental Cold Tolerance of Red Spruce. In: Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States, eds. Eagar, C. and Adams, M.B., Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  11. Dore, A.J., Choularton, T.W., Fowler, D. and Storeton-West, R.: 1990, Field measurements of wet deposition in an extended region of complex topography. Q. J. Roy. Met. Soc. 116: 1193-1212.Google Scholar
  12. Duyzer, J.H., Verhagen, H.L.M., Westrate, J.H. & Bosveld, F.C.: 1992, Measurement of the dry deposition flux of NH 3 on to coniferous forest. Environ. Pollut., 75, 3-14.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Duyzer, J., Deinum, G. and Baak, J.: 1995, The interpretation of measurements of surface exchange of nitrogen oxides; correction for chemical reactions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London 351: 231-248.Google Scholar
  14. Eagar, C. and Adams, M.B. (eds.) 1992, Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States, Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  15. Erisman, J.W. and Draaijers, G.P.J.: 1995, Atmospheric Deposition in relation to Acidification and Eutrophication, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  16. Erisman, J.W. and Wyers, G.P: 1993, Continuous measurements of surface exchange of SO 2 and NH 3: implications for their possible interaction in the deposition process. Atmos Environ A27: 1937-1949.Google Scholar
  17. Erisman, J.W., Bleeker, A. and Jaarsveld, J.A. van: 1998b, Evaluation of ammonia emission abatement on the basis of measurements and model calculations, Environ Pollut 102, SI: 269-274.Google Scholar
  18. Erisman, J.W., Mennen, M.,., Fowler, D., Flechard, C.R., Spindler, G., Gruner, G., Duyzer, J.H., Ruigrok, W. and Wyers, G.P.:1998a, Deposition monitoring in Europe. Environ. Monit. Assess. 53, 279-295.Google Scholar
  19. Flechard, C.R. and Fowler, D.: 1998, Atmospheric ammonia at a moorland site. II: Long-term surface/atmosphere micrometeorological flux measurements. Q.J.R. Meteorol. Soc. 124: 733-757.Google Scholar
  20. Flechard, C.R., Fowler, D., Sutton, M.A. & Cape, J.N.:1999, A dynamic chemical model of bi-directional ammonia exchange between semi-natural vegetation and the atmosphere. Q.J.R.Meteorl. Soc. 125, 1-33.Google Scholar
  21. Foell, W., Green, C., Amann, M., Bhattacharya, S., Carmichael, G., Chadwick, M., Cinderby, S., Haugland, T., Hettlingh, J-P., Hordijk, L., Kuylenstierna, J., Shah, J., Shrestha, R., Streets, D. & Zhao, D.: 1995, Energy use, emissions, and air pollution reduction strategies in Asia. Water Air and Soil Pollut., 85 2277-2282.Google Scholar
  22. Fowler, D. and Duyzer, J.H.: 1989, Micrometeorological techniques for the measurement of trace gas exchange. In: Exchange of Trace Gases Between Terrestrial Ecosystems and the Atmosphere (eds. Andreae, M.O. and Schimel, D.S.): 189-207. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  23. Fowler, D. and Unsworth, M.H.: 1979, Turbulent transfer of sulphur dioxide to a wheat crop. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 105 : 767-784.Google Scholar
  24. Fowler, D., Cape, J.N. and Unsworth, M.H.: 1989, Deposition of atmospheric pollutants on forests, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 324: 247-265.Google Scholar
  25. Fowler, D., Smith, R.I., Coyle, M., Weston, K.J., Davies, T.D., Ashmore, M.R. and Brown, M.: 1995, Quantifying the fine scale (lkm x lkm) exposure, dose and effects of ozone. Part 1. Methodology and application for effects on forests. WaterAir and Soil Pollution 85: 1479-1484.Google Scholar
  26. Fowler, D., Flechard, C.R., Milford, C., Hargreaves, K.J., Storeton-West, R.L., Nemitz, E. and Sutton, M.A.: 1996, Measurements of pollutant concentrations and deposition fluxes to moorland at Auchencorth Moss in southern Scotland, 1995. 47 pp. Commisssion of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  27. Fowler, D., Flechard, C., Skiba, U., Coyle, M. and Cape, J.N.: 1998a, The atmospheric budget of oxidized nitrogen and its role in ozone formation and deposition. New Phytol. 139: 11-23.Google Scholar
  28. Fowler, D., Flechard, C., Sutton, M.A. and Storeton-West, R.L.: 1998b, Long term measurements of the land-atmosphere exchange of ammonia over moorland. Atmos Environ 32: 453-459.Google Scholar
  29. Fowler, D., Pitcaim, C.E.R., Sutton, M.A., Flechard, C., Loubet, B., Coyle, M. and Munro, R.C.: 1998c, The mass budget of atmospheric ammonia in woodland within 1 km of livestock buildings, Environ Pollut 102: 343-348.Google Scholar
  30. Fowler, D., Smith, R.I., Leith, I.D., Crossley, A., Mourne, R.W., Branford, D.W. and Moghaddam, M.: 1998d, Quantifying fine-scale variability in pollutant deposition in complex terrain using 210 Pb inventories in soil. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 105: 459-470.Google Scholar
  31. Fowler, D., Sutton, M.A., Smith, R.I., Pitcaim, C.E.R., Coyle, M., Campbell, G. and Stedman, J.: 1998e, Regional mass budgets of oxidized and reduced nitrogen and their relative contribution to the nitrogen inputs of sensitive ecosystems, Environ Pollut 102, S: 337-342.Google Scholar
  32. Fuhrer, J., Skarby, L. and Ashmore, M.R.: 1997, Critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation in Europe. Environ Pollut 97: 91-106.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Gallagher, M.W., Beswick, K.M., Duyzer, J., Westrate, H., Choularton, T.W. and Hummelshoj, P.: 1997, Measurements of aerosol fluxes to Speulder Forest using a micrometeorological technique. Atmos Environ 31: 359-373.Google Scholar
  34. Galloway, J.N. and Rodhe, H.: 1991, Regional atmospheric budgets of S and N fluxes: how well can they be quantified? Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 97B: 61-80.Google Scholar
  35. Goldsmith, P., Delafield, J.H. and Cox, L.C.: 1963, The role of diffusiophoresis in the scavenging of radioactive particles from the atmosphere. Quart. J.R. Met. Soc. 89: 43-61.Google Scholar
  36. Goulding, K.W.T., Bailey, N.J., Bradbury, N.J., Hargreaves, P., Howe, M., Murphy, D.V., Poulton, P.R. and Willison, T.W.: 1998, Nitrogen deposition and its contribution to nitrogen cycling and associated soil processes, New Phytol. 139: 49-58.Google Scholar
  37. Griinhage, L., Jger, H.-J., Haenel, H.-D., Lpmeier, F.-J., Hanewald, K.:1999, The European critical levels for ozone: improving their usage. Environ Pollut. 105: 163-174.Google Scholar
  38. Hanson, P.J. and Lindberg, S.E.: 1991, Dry deposition of reactive nitrogen compounds: a review of leaf, canopy and non-foliar measurements. Atmos Environ 25A: 1615-1634.Google Scholar
  39. Hargreaves, K.J., Fowler, D., Storeton-West, R.L. and Duyzer, J.H.: 1992, The exchange of nitric oxide, nitrogen dioxide and ozone between pasture and the atmosphere. Environ Pollut. 75: 53-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Heij, G.J. & Schneider, T. Eds.: 1991, Acidification Research in The Netherlands. Studes in Environmental Science 46. Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
  41. Hornung, M., Sutton, M.A. & Wilson, R.B.: 1995, Mapping and Modelling of Critical Loads for Nitrogen-a Workshop Report, Proceedings of UNECE workshop, Grange-over-Sands, October 1994. Institute of TerrestrialEecology, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  42. IPCC,: 1992, Climate Change 1992. The Supplementary Report to the IPCC Scientific Assessment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. IPCC,: 1995,Climate Change 1994. Radiative Forcing of Climate Change and An Evaluation of the IPCC IS92 Emission Scenarios. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Jarvis, P.G., James, G.B. and Landsberg, J.J.: 1975, Coniferous Forest. In: Vegetation and the Atmosphere, ed. Monteith, J.L., Academic Press Inc. ( London) Ltd.Google Scholar
  45. Johnson, A.H.: 1987, Deterioration of red spruce in the Northern Appalachian Mountains. In Effects of atmospheric pollutants on forests, wetlands and agricultural ecosystems (ed. Hutchison, T.C. and Meema, K.M.) NATO ASI series vol. 916): 83-99. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  46. Karenlampi, L. & Skairby, L. Eds:1996, Critical levels for Ozone in Europe: Testing and Finalising the Concepts. Proceedings of UNECE Workshop, Kuopio, Finland, 1996, University of Kuopio.Google Scholar
  47. Kuylenstiema, J. C.I., Hicks, W.K., Cinderby, S. & Cambridge, H.:,1999 Critical loads for nitrogen deposition and their exceedance at European scale. Environ. Pollut. 102:591-598.Google Scholar
  48. Lekkerkerk, I.J.A.: 1998, Implications of Dutch ammonia policy on the livestock sector.. Atmos Environ 32: 581-588.Google Scholar
  49. Matthews, E.: 1983, Global vegetation and land use:new high-resolution data bases for climate studies. J. Clim Appl. Meteorrol., 22, 474-487.Google Scholar
  50. McLaughlin, S.B. and Kohut, R.J.: 1992, The Effects of Atmospheric Deposition and Ozone on Carbon Allocation and Associated Physiological Processes in Red Spruce. In: Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States, eds. Eagar, C. and Adams, M.B., Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  51. Miller, P.R., Parmeter, J.R. Jr., Taylor, O.C. and Cardiff, E.A.: 1963, Ozone injury to the foliage of Ponderosa pine. Phytopath 53: 1072-1076.Google Scholar
  52. Mohnen, V.A.: 1992, Atmospheric Deposition and Pollutant Exposure of Eastern U.S. Forests. In: Ecology and Decline of Red Spruce in the Eastern United States, eds. Eagar, C. and Adams, M.B., Berlin-Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  53. Monteith, J.L. and Unsworth, K.H.: 1990, Principles of Environmental Physics. Edward Arnold, London.Google Scholar
  54. Neftel, A, Moor, E., Oeschger, H. and Stauffer, B.: 1985, Evidence from polar ice cores for the increase in atmospheric C02 in the past two centuries. Nature 315: 45-47.Google Scholar
  55. PORG: 1997. Ozone in the UK. Fourth report of the Photochemical Oxidants Review Group. 234 pp. Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London. (ITE Edinburgh).Google Scholar
  56. RGAR: 1997, Acid deposition in the United Kingdom 1992-1994. In The Fourth Report of the United Kingdom review group on acid rain, DETR.Google Scholar
  57. Rodhe, H. and Herrera, R. (eds): 1988, Acidification in Tropical Countries, Scope 36 , J. Wiley, Chichester, Great Britain.Google Scholar
  58. Schulze, E.-D. and Freer-Smith, P.H.: 1991, An evaluation of forest decline based on field observations focussed on Norway spruce, Picea abies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 97B, 155-168.Google Scholar
  59. Sheppard, L.J.: 1991, Causal mechanisms by which sulphate, nitrate and acidity influence forest hardiness in red spruce: review and hypothesis, New Phytol. 127, 69-82.Google Scholar
  60. Shuttleworth, W.J.: 1989, Micrometeorology of temperate and tropical forest, Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 324: 299-334.Google Scholar
  61. Skarby, L., Ro-Poulsen, H., Wellburn, F.A.M. and Sheppard, L.J.: 1998, Impacts of ozone on forests: a European perspective, New Phytol, 139, 109-122.Google Scholar
  62. Skiba, U., Fowler, D. and Smith, K.A.: 1994, Emissions of NO and N 2 0 from soils. In: Ham, L.J.J.van, Janssen, H.M. and Swart, R.J. (eds). Non-CO 2 Greenhouse Gases, Dordrecht: Kluwer:153-158.Google Scholar
  63. Slinn,: 1982, Predictions for particle deposition to vegetative caopies. Atmos. Environ. 16, 1785-1794.Google Scholar
  64. Spiecker, H., Mielikainen, K., Kohl, M and Skovsgaard, J.P. (eds.): 1996, Growth Trends in European Forests, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg.Google Scholar
  65. Spindler, G. & Gruner, A.: 1996, Towards development of a deposition monitoring network for air pollution of Europe; The Melpitz site in Germany-Results of measurements made in 1995, IFT, Leipzig, Germany.Google Scholar
  66. Stevenson, D.S., Johnson, C.E., Collins, W.J., Derwent, R.G., Shine, K.P. and Edwards, J.M.: 1998, Evolution of tropospheric ozone radiative forcing. Geophysical Research Letters 25: 3819-3822.Google Scholar
  67. Sutton, M.A., Fowler, D. and Moncrieff, J.B.: 1993a, The exchange of atmospheric ammonia with vegetated surfaces. I Unfertilized vegetation. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 119: 1023-1045.Google Scholar
  68. Sutton, M.A., Fowler, D., Moncrieff, J.B. and Storeton-West, R.L.: 1993b, The exchange of atmospheric ammonia with vegetated surfaces. II: Fertilized vegetation. Q. J. R. Met. Soc. 119: 1047-1070.Google Scholar
  69. Sutton, M.A., Pitcairn, C.E.R. and Fowler, D.: 1993c, The exchange of ammonia between the atmosphere and plant communities. Advances in Ecological Research, 24: 301-393.Google Scholar
  70. Sutton, M.A., Schorring, J.K. and Wyers, G.P.: 1995, Plant-atmosphere exchange of ammonia. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London A. 351: 261-278.Google Scholar
  71. Thom, A.S.: 1975, Momentum, mass and heat exchange of plant communities. In Vegetation and atmosphere (ed. Monteith, J.L.): 57-109. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  72. Thornley, J.H.M., Fowler, D. and Cannell, M.G.R.: 1991, Terrestrial carbon storage resulting from CO 2 and nitrogen fertilisation in temperate grasslands. Plant Cell and Environment, 14: 1007-1011.Google Scholar
  73. Wang, Y., Logan, J.A., Jacob, D.J. and Spivakovsky, C.M.: 1998, Global simulation of 0 3-NOx-hydrocarbon chemistry, 2. Model evaluation and global ozone budget. Journal of Geophysical Research 103 D9, 10757-10767.Google Scholar
  74. Woodward, F.I., & Sheehy, J.E.: 1983, Principles and measurements in Environmental Biology. London; Butterworths.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Fowler
    • 1
  • J. Neil Cape
    • 1
  • Mhairi Coyle
    • 1
  • Chris Flechard
    • 1
  • Johan Kuylenstierna
    • 2
  • Kevin Hicks
    • 2
  • Dick Derwent
    • 3
  • Colin Johnson
    • 3
  • David Stevenson
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Terrestrial EcologyEdinburghUK
  2. 2.University of YorkStockholm Environment InstituteUK
  3. 3.Meteorological OfficeUK

Personalised recommendations