Language Without Linguistics
Though Mr. Lin purports to attack “Chomsky's view of language” and to defend the “common sense view of language”, he in fact attacks “views” that are basic and common to linguists, psycholinguists, and developmental psychologists. Indeed, though he cites W. V. O. Quine, L. Wittgenstein, and J. L. Austin in his support, they all sharply part company from his views, Austin particularly. Lin's views are not common sense but a set of scholarly and philological prejudices that linguistics disparaged from its inception as an organized science a hundred years ago.
Professor [of Philosophy]: I will explain to you the secrets of language in all its wealth and complexity.
Monsieur Jordain: & Great. Now I'll let you into a secret of my own. I am in love with a lady – a noble lady – and I would like you to help me write a little note which I can drop at her dainty feet.
Professor: ...Presumably you want it written in verse?
Monsieur Jourdain: Verse. No. I can't stand verse.
Professor: In prose, then.
Monsieur Jourdain: What do you think I am? Prose? Not [expletive deleted] likely!
Professor: Well, I'm sorry, but it has to be one or the other. You can only express yourself in prose or verse.
Monsieur Jourdain: What, [expletive deleted]-all else? Just prose or verse? ... That's a bit of a let down. Call yourself a philosopher? ...What about when I talk like I am doing right at this moment, what's that then?
Philosopher: That, Monsieur, is prose.
Monsieur Jourdain: You mean I have been talking in prose for forty [expletive deleted] years and never known it?
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Austin, J. L.: 1979, How to Do Things with Words, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Austin, J. L.: 1975, Philosophical Papers, 2nd edn, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Austin, J. L.: 1962, Sense and Sensibilia, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Bickerton, D.: 1990, Language and Species, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N.: 1995, 'Language and Nature', Mind 104(1).Google Scholar
- Elman et al.: 1996, Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development, MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
- Firth, J. R. 1930/1964, The Tongues of Men and Speech, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Firth, J. R.: 1937/1964, The Tongues of Men and Speech, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Firth, J. R: 1957, Papers in Linguistics, Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
- Grice, H. P.: 1957, 'Meaning', Philosophical Review 66(3).Google Scholar
- Klima, E. and U. Bellugi: 1979, The Signs of Language, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Langedoen, D. T.: 1968, The London School of Linguistics: A Study of the Linguistic Theories of B. Malinoski and R. Firth, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
- Leiber, J.: 1997a, 'On What Sort of Speech Act Wittgenstein's Investigationsis and Why it Matters', Philosophical Forum XXVIII, 232–67.Google Scholar
- Wittgenstein, L.: 1953, Philosophical Investigations, Macmillan, New York.Google Scholar