Water, Air, and Soil Pollution

, Volume 116, Issue 1–2, pp 255–260

Visible Ozone Injury on Forest Trees in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA

  • A. Chappelka
  • G. Somers
  • J. Renfro
Article

Abstract

During the summer of 1991 ozone injury trend plots in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA, consisting of mature black cherry, sassafras and yellow-poplar were established near three ozone monitors, ranging in elevation from 597-1265 m. Beginning in mid-August 1991-1993, three exposed branches each from the upper- and mid- to lower-crown of each tree were collected and evaluated for ozone injury. Of the trees examined, 63%, 52% and 36% exhibited some amount of foliar injury in 1991, 1992 and 1993, respectively. Ozone injury across species was the greatest at Cove Mountain in all three years of the study. Overall, across sites and years, 11, 12 and 11% of all leaves examined exhibited visible injury for black cherry, sassfras and yellow-poplar, respectively. The percentage of injured leaves per branch was greater in the mid- to lower-canopy for black cherry, across all sites. Trees for each species that exhibited the greatest or least amounts of visible injury did so in all three years of the study, indicating a differential sensitivity within each species population. No significant ozone exposure-tree response relationships were observed with any variable tested. These data indicate that ozone concentrations are high enough to cause visible symptoms to selected trees within Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA.

ozone ecosystem visible injury foliar symptoms elevation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barbo, D.N., Chappelka, A.H., Somers, G.L., Miller-Goodman, M.S. and Stolte, K.: 1998, New Phytol. 138, 653.Google Scholar
  2. Chappelka, A.H. and Chevone, B.I.: 1992, in Surface Level Ozone Exposures and Their Effects on Vegetation, Lefohn, A.S. (ed.), pp. 271–324, Lewis Publ. Inc, Chelsea, MLGoogle Scholar
  3. Chappelka, A.H., Renfro, J.R., and Somers, G.L.: 1994, ‘Visible Ozone Injury on Native Plant Species Within Great Smoky Mountains National Park’, Proc. 87 th Ann. Met. Of Air and Waste Mange. Assoc., 94–TA36.04, Cincinnati, OH.Google Scholar
  4. Chappelka, A.H., and Samuelson, L.J.: 1998, New Phytol. 139, 91.Google Scholar
  5. Chappelka, A., Skelly, J. Somers, G., Renfro, J. and Hildebrand, E.: 1999, Water, Air, Soil Pollut. (this volume).Google Scholar
  6. Fredricksen, T.S., Joyce, B.J., Skelly, J.M., Steiner, K.C., Kolb, T.E., Kouterick, K.B., Savage, J.E. and Snyder, K.R.: 1995, Environ. Pollut. 89, 273.Google Scholar
  7. Fredricksen, T.S., Kolb, T.E., Skelly, J.M., Steiner, K.C., Joyce, B.J. and Savage, J.E.: 1996, Tree Physiol. 16, 485.Google Scholar
  8. Hildebrand, E.S., Skelly, J.M., and Fredricksen, T.: 1996, Can. J. For. Res. 26, 658.Google Scholar
  9. Horsfall, J.G. and Barratt, R.W.: 1945, Phytopathology 35, 655.Google Scholar
  10. Lefohn, A.S., Laurence, J.A., and Kohut, R.J.: 1988, Atmos. Environ. 21, 1229.Google Scholar
  11. Lefohn, A.S. and Lucier, A.A.: 1988, J. Air Pollut. Contr. Assoc. 38, 1504.Google Scholar
  12. Manning, W.J.: 1993, Proc. 86 th Ann. Meet. of Air and Waste Mange. Assoc., 93–WA80.01, Denver,CO.Google Scholar
  13. Montgomery, D.C. and Peck, E.A.: 1982, Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  14. Nash, B.L., Saunders, M.C., Miller, B.J., Bloom, C.A., Davis, D.D. and Skelly, J.M.: 1992, Can. J. For. Res. 22, 1770.Google Scholar
  15. Neter, J., Wasserman, W. and Kutner, M.H.: 1990. Applied Linear Statistical Models, 3 rd edn., R.D. Irwin Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  16. Shaver, C.L., Tonnessen, K.A. and Maniero, T.G.: 1994, Ecol. Appl. 4, 690.Google Scholar
  17. Showman, R.E.: 1991, J. Air Waste Mang. Assoc. 41, 63.Google Scholar
  18. Somers, G.L., Chappelka, A.H., Rosseau, P. and Renfro. J.R.: 1998, For. Ecol. Mgt., 104, 129.Google Scholar
  19. Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H.: 1960, Principles and Procedures of Statistics, McGraw Hill Inc., New York, NY.Google Scholar
  20. United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA): 1996, Air Quality Criteria for Ozone and Other Photochemical Oxidants, Vol. II, EPA/600/P-93/004bF.Google Scholar
  21. Winner, W.E., Lefohn, A.S., Cotter, I.S., Greitner, C.S. Nellesen, J., McEvoy, L.R., Olson, R.L., Atkinson, C.J. and Moore, L.D.: 1989, Proc. Natl. Acad Sci. 86, 8828.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Chappelka
    • 1
  • G. Somers
    • 1
  • J. Renfro
    • 2
  1. 1.School of ForestryAuburn UniversityUSA
  2. 2.Division of Resource Management and Science, Great Smoky Mountains National ParkNational Park ServiceGatlinburgUSA

Personalised recommendations