, Volume 120, Issue 1, pp 27–47 | Cite as

Unification – It's Magnificent But Is It Explanation?

  • Ilpo Halonen
  • Jaakko Hintikka


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Barnes, E.: 1992. ‘Explanatory Unification and Scientific Understanding’, Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 1, 3–12.Google Scholar
  2. Bartelborth, T.: 1996, ‘Scientific Explanation’, in U. C. Moulines (ed.), Structuralist Theory of Science: Focal Issues, New Results, de Gruyter, New York, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  3. Churchman, C. and R. Ackoff: 1946, ‘Varieties of Unification’, Philosophy of Science 13, 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Fölsing, A.: 1997, Albert Einstein: A Biography, Viking, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Forster, M.: 1988, ‘Unification, Explanation, and the Composition of Causes in Newtonian Mechanics’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 19, 55–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gemes, K.: 1994, ‘Explanation, Unification and Content’, Nous 28, 225–40.Google Scholar
  7. Grosholz, E.: 1980, ‘Descartes'z Unification of Algebra and Geometry’, in S. Gaukroger (ed.), Descartes: Philosophy, Mathematics and Physics, Harvester Press, Sussex, U.K., pp. 156–68.Google Scholar
  8. Grosholz, E.: 1985, ‘Two Episodes in the Unification of Logic and Topology’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 36, 147–57.Google Scholar
  9. Halonen, I. and J. Hintikka: (Forthcoming), ‘Toward a Theory of the Process of Explanation’, Synthese.Google Scholar
  10. Hempel, C.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Hintikka, J.: 1988, “What is the Logic of Experimental Inquiry?', Synthese 74, 133–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hintikka, J.: 1990, ‘Paradigms for Language Theory’,Acta Philosophica Fennica 49, 181–209.Google Scholar
  13. Hintikka, J.: 1992, The Concept of Induction in the Light of the Interrogative Approach to Inquiry', in J. Earman (ed.), Inference, Explanation and Other Frustrations, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, pp. 23–43.Google Scholar
  14. Hintikka, J.: 1995, ‘What is Elementary Logic?’, in K. Gavroglu, J. Stachel and M. Wartofsky (eds.), Physics, Philosophy and the Scientific Community, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 301–26.Google Scholar
  15. Hintikka, J. and I. Halonen: 1995, ‘Semantics and Pragmatics forWhy-questions’, Journal of Philosophy 92, 636–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hintikka, J., I. Halonen, and A. Mutanen: ‘Interrogative Logic as a General Theory of Reasoning’, in Jaakko Hintikka (ed.), Inquiry as Inquiry: A Logic of Scientific Discovery, Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp. 47–90.Google Scholar
  17. Hintikka, J. and U. Remes: 1974, The Method of Analysis, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  18. Humphreys, P.: 1993, ‘Greater Unification Equals Greater Understanding?’, Analysis 53, 183–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jones, T.: 1995a, ‘How the Unification Theory of Explanation Escapes Asymmetry Problems’, Erkenntnis 43, 229–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, T.: 1995b, ‘Reductionism and the Unification Theory of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 62, 21–30.Google Scholar
  21. Jones, T.: 1997, ‘Unification, Reduction, and Non-Ideal Explanations’, Synthese 112, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kanitscheider, B. 1991, ‘Unification as an Epistemological Problem’, in G. Schurz (ed.), Advances in Scientific Philosophy, Rodopi, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  23. Kitcher, P.: 1976. ‘Explanation, Conjunction, and Unification’, Journal of Philosophy 73, 207–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kitcher, P.: 1981, ‘Explanatory Unification’, Philosophy of Science 48, 507–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kitcher, P.: 1985, ‘Two Approaches to Explanation’, Journal of Philosophy 82, 632–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kitcher, P.: 1989, ‘Explanatory Unification and the Causal Structure of the World’, in P. Kitcher and W. Salmon (eds.), pp. 410–505.Google Scholar
  27. Kitcher, P. and W. Salmon (eds.): 1989, Scientific Explanation, Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science, Vol. 13, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  28. Mach, 1960, The Science of Mechanics, Open Court, La Salle, CA.Google Scholar
  29. Morrison, M.: 1990, ‘Unification, Realism and Inference’, British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 41, 305–32.Google Scholar
  30. Morrison, M.: 1992, ‘A Study in Theory Unification: The Case of Maxwell's Electromagnetic Theory’, Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 23, 103–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Newton, 1952, Opticks (based on the fourth edition, London 1730), Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Newton, I.: 1952, in H. S. Thayer (ed.), Newton's Philosophy of Nature, Hafner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Pais, A.: 1982, “Subtle is the Lord”: The Science and the Life of Albert Einstein, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  34. Salmon, W.: 1990, ‘Scientific Explanation: Causation and Unification’, Critica 22, 3–24.Google Scholar
  35. Schurtz, G.: 1997, ‘Unification, Understanding and Scientific Progress’, in G. Meggle (ed.), Analyomen 2, Volume I: Logic, Epistemology, Philosophy of Science, de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 481–94.Google Scholar
  36. Szekely, D.: 1969, ‘The Principles of the Theory of the Unification of Sciences’, Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 10, 181–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Van Fraassen, B.: 1977, ‘The Pragmatics of Explanation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 143–50.Google Scholar
  38. Weber, E.: 1995, ‘Some Problems for Kitcher's Unification Account of Explanation’, Communication and Cognition 28, 441–55.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ilpo Halonen
    • 1
  • Jaakko Hintikka
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of HelsinkiFinland
  2. 2.Department of PhilosophyBoston UniversityBostonU.S.A.

Personalised recommendations