Advertisement

Transportation

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 141–171 | Cite as

Space, money, life-stage, and the allocation of time

  • David M. Levinson
Article

Abstract

Demographic, socioeconomic, seasonal, and scheduling factors affect the allocation of time to various activities. This paper examines those variables through exploration of the 1990 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey, which has been inverted to track activity duration. Two key issues are considered. First, how much can activity duration and frequency explain travel duration? The analysis shows activity duration has positive and significant effects on travel duration, supporting recent arguments in favor of activity based models. Second, which recent trend is the main culprit in the rise in travel: suburbanization, rising personal incomes, or female labor force participation? This paper examines the share of time within a 24-hour budget allocated to several primary activities: home, work, shop, and other. The data suggest that income and location have modest effects on time allocation compared with the loss of discretionary time due to working.

activity patterns time use transportation models travel behavior travel demand 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allaman PM, Tardiff T & Dunbar F (1982) New Approaches to Understanding Travel Behavior NCHRP Report 250. Washington DC: Transportation Research Board.Google Scholar
  2. Becker G (1965) A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal 75(299) (Sept 1965): 493–517.Google Scholar
  3. Beek, P van, Kalfs N & Blom U (1997) Gender differences in activities and mobility in the Netherlands, 1975–1990. Presented at Transportation Research Board, [1997]. Preprint 97–0414.Google Scholar
  4. Chapin FS & Hightower H (1965) Household activity patterns and land use. AIP Journal 31(3): 222–231.Google Scholar
  5. Chapin FS (1974) Human Activity Patterns in the City: Things People Do in Time and in Space. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  6. Chapin FS (1968) Activity systems and urban structure: a working schema AIP Journal 34(1) (January 1968).Google Scholar
  7. Chapin FS (1971) Free time activities and quality of urban life AIP Journal 37(6) (November, 1971).Google Scholar
  8. Chumak A & Braaksma JP (1981) Implications of the travel time budget for urban transportation modeling in Canada. Transportation Research Record 794: 19–27.Google Scholar
  9. Clarke MI, Dix MC, Jones PM & Heggie IG (1981) Some recent developments in activity travel analysis and modeling. Transportation Research Record 794: 1–8.Google Scholar
  10. Gross G (1993) Time and Money: The Making of Consumer Culture. New York: Routledge Books.Google Scholar
  11. Daly A (1993) ALOGIT Users' Guide Version 3.1. Hague, the Netherlands: Hague Consulting Group.Google Scholar
  12. Damm D (1983) Theory and empirical results: a comparison of recent activity based research. In: Carpenter S & Jones P (eds) New Approaches to Analyzing Travel Behavior. Aldershot: Gower.Google Scholar
  13. de Grazia S (1962) Of Time, Work and Leisure. New York: Vintage Books, 1990 ed.Google Scholar
  14. Ettema R, Borgers A & Timmermans H (1993) Simulation model of activity scheduling behavior. Transportation Research Record 1413: 1, 11.Google Scholar
  15. Ettema R, Borgers A & Timmermans H (1995) Competing risk hazard model of activity choice, timing, sequence, and duration. Transportation Research Record 1493: 101, 109.Google Scholar
  16. Ettema R, Borgers A & Timmermans H (1996) SMASH (Simulation Model of Activity Scheduling Heuristics): some simulations. Transportation Research Record 1551: 88, 94.Google Scholar
  17. Ettema R & Timmermans H (1997) Activity Based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Oxford UK: Elsevier Science Ltd.Google Scholar
  18. Garling T (1992) Determinants of everyday time allocation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 33(2) (May).Google Scholar
  19. Golob JM & Golob TF (1983) Classification of Approaches to Travel Behavior Analysis, Travel Analysis Methods for the 1980's. Special Report 201. Transportation Research Board Washington DC.Google Scholar
  20. Golob TF & McNally MG (1997) A model of activity participation and travel interactions between household heads. Tranpsortation Research Part B, Methodological 31B(3) (June).Google Scholar
  21. Gordon P, Kumar A & Richardson H (1988) Beyond the journey to work. Transportation Research A 22A(6): 419–426.Google Scholar
  22. Gordon P & Richardson H & Jun M-J (1991) The Commuting paradox: evidence from the top twenty. Journal of the American Planning Association 57(4): 416–420.Google Scholar
  23. Hagerstrand T (1970) What about people in regional science? Paper of the Regional Science Association 24: 7–24.Google Scholar
  24. Hamed M & Mannering F (1993) Modeling travelers: post work activity involvement: toward a new methodology. Transportation Science 27(4) (Nov. 1993): 381–394.Google Scholar
  25. Hanson S & Hanson P (1981) The travel activity patters of urban residents: dimensions and relationships to socio-economic characteristics. Economic Geography 57: 332–347.Google Scholar
  26. Hatcher SG & Mahmassani H (1992) Daily variability of route and trip scheduling decisions for the evening commute. Transportation Research Record 1357: 72–81.Google Scholar
  27. Hsu C-I & Hsieh Y-P (1997) Travel and activity choices based on an individual accessibility model. Presented at Western Regional Science Association meeting Waikaloa Hawaii, Feb. 1997.Google Scholar
  28. Kalfs N & Saris WE (1997) New Data Collection Methods in Travel Surveys. Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  29. Kalfs N (1995) Effects of different data collection procedures in time use research. Transportation Research Record. (1493) (July 1995).Google Scholar
  30. Kitamura R (1988) Formulation of trip generation models using panel data. Transportation Research Record 1203: 60–68.Google Scholar
  31. Kitamura R & Kermanshah M (1983). Identifying Time and History Dependencies of Activity Choice. Transportation Research Record 994: 22–30.Google Scholar
  32. Kitamura R???van der Hoorn T & van Wijk F (1997) A comparative analysis of daily time use and the development of an activity based traveller benefit measure. In: Ettema & Timmermans (eds) Activity Based Approaches to Travel Analysis (pp 171–187), 1997.Google Scholar
  33. Levinson D & Kumar A (1994) The rational locator: why travel times have remained stable. Journal of the American Planning Association 60(3): 319–331.Google Scholar
  34. Levinson D & Kumar A (1995a) Activity, travel, and the allocation of time. Journal of the American Planning Association 61(4) (Autumn): 458–470.Google Scholar
  35. Levinson D & Kumar A (1995b) Temporal variations on the allocation of time. Transportation Research Record 1493: 118–127.Google Scholar
  36. Levinson D & Kumar A (1997) Residential density, city size, and the journey to work. Growth and Change 28 (Spring): 147–172.Google Scholar
  37. Ma J & Goulias KG (1996b) Sample weights for Puget Sound transportation panel using stratification anchors in public use microdata sample and probabilistic models for self-selection. Transportation Research Record 1551: (November), 36–44.Google Scholar
  38. Ma J & Goulias KG (1996a) Multivariate marginal frequency analysis of activity and travel patterns in first four waves of Puget Sound transportation panel. Transportation Research Record 1556 (November): 67–76.Google Scholar
  39. Ma J & Goulias KG (1997) An analysis of activity and travel patterns in the Puget Sound transportation panel. In: Ettema and Timmermans (eds) Activity-based Approaches to Travel Analysis. Oxford: Pergamon.Google Scholar
  40. Meier R (1959) Human time allocation: a basis for social accounts. AIP Journal 34(1): 27–33.Google Scholar
  41. Michelson W (1985) From Sun to Sun: Daily Obligations and Community Structure in the Lives of Employed Women and Their Families. Totowa, New Jersey: Rowman and Allenshed.Google Scholar
  42. Niemeier D & Morita JG (1996) Duration of trip-making activities by men and women. A survival analysis. Transportation 23: 353–371.Google Scholar
  43. Pas E & Koppelman F (1986) An examination of the determinations of day to day variability in individuals Urban Travel Behavior. Transportation 14: 3–20.Google Scholar
  44. Pas EI & Harvey AS (1997) Time use research and travel demand analysis and modelling. In: Understanding Travel Behaviour in an Era of Change. Oxford UK: Pergamon, 1997.Google Scholar
  45. Pas E (1984) The effect of selected socio-demographic characteristics on daily travel activity behavior. Environment and Planning 16: 507–529.Google Scholar
  46. Prendergast LS & Williams RD (1981) Individual Travel Time Budgets. Transportation Research 15A(1): 39–46.Google Scholar
  47. Purvis C (1995) Changes in regional travel characteristics and travel time expenditures in the San Francisco Bay area: 1960–1990. Transportation Research Record 1466: 99–110.Google Scholar
  48. Recker W, McNally M & Root GS (1986) A model of complex travel behavior: Part I – Theoretical development and Part II – An operational model. Transportation Research 20A: 307–318 and 319–330.Google Scholar
  49. Robinson JP (1977) How Americans Use Time: A Social-Psychological Analysis of Everyday Behavior. New York: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
  50. Robinson JP & Godbey G (1997). Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time. University Park PA: Penn State Press.Google Scholar
  51. Schor J (1991). The Overworked American: the Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  52. Scwartz F (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Review (Jan. 1, 1989).Google Scholar
  53. Sorokin PA & Berger CQ (1939) Time Budgets of Human Behavior. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Szalai A (1972) The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. The Hague: Mouton Publishers.Google Scholar
  55. Tanner JC (1981) Expenditure of time and money on travel. Transportation Research 15A(1): 25–38.Google Scholar
  56. Train K (1986) Qualitative Choice Analysis. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  57. USDOT (1991) The 1990/91 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey: User's Guide for the Public Use Tapes, Dec. 1991, USDOT/FHWA.Google Scholar
  58. Zahavi Y & Ryan J (1980) Stability of travel components over time. Transportation Research Record 750: 19–26.Google Scholar
  59. Zahavi Y & Talvittie A (1980) Regularities in travel time and money expenditures. Transportation Research Record 750: 13–19.Google Scholar
  60. Zahavi Y (1974) Travel Time Budget and Mobility in Urban Areas, Federal Highway Administration, Washington DC, US Department of Transportation, May 1974, NTIS PB 234 145.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • David M. Levinson
    • 1
  1. 1.BerkeleyUSA (e-mail

Personalised recommendations