Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 29, Issue 1, pp 45–59 | Cite as

The Differential Relations of Parent and Peer Attachment to Adolescent Adjustment

  • Deborah J. Laible
  • Gustavo Carlo
  • Marcela Raffaelli


Whether or not close emotional relationships with parents and peers serve similar functions for adolescent adjustment is an issue of increasing interest. The present study was designed to examine the relations between parent and peer attachment and adolescent adjustment. Eighty-nine adolescents (M age = 16.1 years, SD = 1.8 years) completed self-report measures of parent and peer attachment, sympathy, academic efficacy, aggression, anxiety, and depression. Adolescents were divided into four groups on the basis of their parent and peer attachment scores: those high on both, those low on both, those high on peer but low on parent attachment, and those high on parent but low on peer attachment. Discriminant function analyses revealed that the groups differed only along one dimension, suggesting that parent and peer attachment served similar functions in terms of the adjustment indices measured. Adolescents high on both peer and parent attachment were the best adjusted (i.e., least aggressive and depressed, most sympathetic) and those low on both were the least well adjusted. Furthermore, those high on peer but low on parent attachment were better adjusted than those high on parent but low on peer attachment, suggesting that peer attachment may be relatively more influential on adolescent adjustment than parent attachment.


Function Analysis Similar Function Discriminant Function Discriminant Function Analysis Parent Attachment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Adams, G., and Gullotta, T. (1989). Adolescent Life Experiences, Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  2. Ainsworth, M. D. S. (1989). Attachments beyond infancy. Am. Psychol. 44: 709–716.Google Scholar
  3. Amrsden, G., and Greenberg, M. (1987). The inventory of parent and peer attachment: Individual differences and their relationship to psychological well-being in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 16: 427–454.Google Scholar
  4. Azmitia, M., and Perlmutter, M. (1989). Social influences on children's cognition: State of the art and future directions. In Reese, H. W. (ed.), Advances in Child Development and Behavior, Vol. 22, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  5. Barrera, M., and Garrison Jones, C. (1992). Family and peer social support as specific correlates of adolescent depressive symptoms. J. Abnorm. Child Psychol. 20: 1–16.Google Scholar
  6. Bell, R. Q. (1968). A reinterpretation of the direction of effects in studies of socialization. Psychol. Rev. 75: 81–95.Google Scholar
  7. Belsky, J., and Pensky, E. (1988). Developmental history, personality, and family relationships: Toward an emergent family system. In Hinde, R. A., and Stevenson-Hinde, J. (eds.), Relationships Within Families, Clarendon, Oxford, pp. 193–217.Google Scholar
  8. Blain, M., Thompson, J., and Whiffen, V. (1993). Attachment and perceived social support in late adolescence: The interaction between working models of self and others. J. Adolesc. Res. 8: 226–241.Google Scholar
  9. Blyth, D. A., Hill, J. P., and Thiel, K. S. (1982). Early adolescents' significant others: Grade and gender differences in perceived relationships with familial and non-familial adults and young people. J. Youth Adolesc. 11: 425–450.Google Scholar
  10. Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. Attachment, Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and Anger, Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bowlby, J. (1980). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 3. Loss: Sadness and Depression, Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Bradford, E., and Lyddon, W. J. (1993). Current parental attachment: Its relation to perceived psychological distress and relationship satisfaction in college students. J. College Stud. Dev. 34: 256–272.Google Scholar
  14. Bretherton, I. (1985). Attachment theory: Retrospect and prospect. In Bretherton, I., and Waters, E. (eds.), Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 50: 66–104 (Nos. 1- 2, Serial No. 209).Google Scholar
  15. Bretherton, I. (1990). Open communication and internal working models: Their role in the development of attachment relations. In Thompson, R. A. (ed.), Socioemotional Development. Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, Vol. 36, University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, pp. 57–113.Google Scholar
  16. Cauce, A. M., Mason, C., Gonzales, N., Hiraga, Y., and Liu, G. (1994). Social support during adolescence: Methodological and theoretical considerations. In Nestman, F., and Hurrelmann, K. (eds.), Social Networks and Social Support in Childhood and Adolescence, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 89–108.Google Scholar
  17. Coie, J. D., and Dodge, K. A. (1997). Aggression and antisocial behavior. In Damon, W. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th ed., Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (N. Eisenberg, vol. ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 779–862.Google Scholar
  18. Coddington, R. D. (1972). The significance of life events as etiologic factors in the diseases of children II. J. Psychosom. Res. 16: 7–18.Google Scholar
  19. Coleman, J. (1961). The Adolescent Society: The Social Life of a Teenager and Its Impact on Education, Basic, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 25: 70–87.Google Scholar
  21. Demo, D., and Acock, A. (1996). Family structure, family process, and adolescent well-being. J. Res. Adolesc. 6: 457–488.Google Scholar
  22. Eisenberg, N., and Fabes, R. A. (1997). Prosocial development. In Damon, W. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th ed., Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (N. Eisenberg, vol. ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 701–778.Google Scholar
  23. Eliot, G., and Feldman, S. (1990). Capturing the adolescent experience. In Feldman, S., and Eliot, G. (eds.), Children's Social Networks and Social Supports, Wiley, New York, pp. 119–150.Google Scholar
  24. Erikson, M., Sroufe, L. A., and Egeland, B. (1985). The relationship between the quality of attachment behavior problems in preschool in a high-risk sample. In Bretherton, I., and Waters, E. (eds.), Growing Points of Attachment Theory and Research. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 50: 147–166 (Nos. 1- 2, Serial No. 209).Google Scholar
  25. Freeman, H. (1997). Who do you turn to? Parents and peers as attachment figures during adolescence. Paper presented at Society for Research in Child Development, Washington, DC, Apr.Google Scholar
  26. Furman, W., and Buhmester, D. (1992). Age and sex differences in perceptions of networks and personal relationships. Child Dev. 63: 103–115.Google Scholar
  27. Garneski, N., and Diekstra, R. (1996). Perceived social support from family, school, and peers: Relationship with emotional and behavioral problems among adolescents. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 35: 1657–1664.Google Scholar
  28. Greenberg, M., Siegal, J., and Leithch, C. J. (1983). The nature and importance of attachment relationships to parents and peers during adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 12: 373–386.Google Scholar
  29. Hazan, C., and Shaver, P. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 52: 511–524.Google Scholar
  30. Howes, C. (1999). Attachment relationships in the context of multiple caregivers. In Cassidy, J., and Shaver, P. (eds.), Handbook of Attachment, Guilford, New York, pp. 671–687.Google Scholar
  31. Kobak, R. R., and Cole, H. (1994). Disorders and dysfunctions of the self. In Cicchetti, D., and Toth, S. (eds.), Rochester Symposium on Developmental Psychopathology, Vol. 5. University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY, pp. 267–297.Google Scholar
  32. Kobak, R. R., and Sceery, A. (1988). Attachment in late adolescence:Working models, affect regulation, and representations of self and others. Child Dev. 59: 135–146.Google Scholar
  33. Kovacs, M., and Beck, A. T. (1977). An empirical and clinical approach towards defining childhood depression. In Schulterbrandt, J. G., and Rasbin, A. (eds.), Depression in Childhood: Diagnosis, Treatment and Conceptual Models, Raven Press, New York, pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
  34. Kuczynski, L., Marshall, S., and Schell, K. (1997). Value socialization in a bidirectional context. In Grusec, J. El., and Kuczynski, L. (eds.), Parenting Strategies and Children's Internalization of Values: A Handbook of Theoretical and Research Perspectives, Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  35. LaFreniere, P. J., and Sroufe, L. A. (1985). Profiles of peer competence in the preschool: Interrelations between measures, influence of social ecology, and relation to attachment history. Dev. Psychol. 21: 56–69.Google Scholar
  36. Laible, D. J., and Thompson, R. A. (1998). Attachment and emotional understanding in preschool children. Dev. Psychol. 34: 1038–1045.Google Scholar
  37. Lapsley, D., Rice, K., and FitzGerald, D. (1990). Adolescent attachment, identity, and adjustment to college: Implications for the continuity of adaptation hypothesis. J. Counsel. Dev. 68: 561–565.Google Scholar
  38. Laursen, B., and Collins, W. (1994). Interpersonal conflict during adolescence. Psychol. Bull. 115: 197–209.Google Scholar
  39. Maccoby, E., and Martin, J. (1983). Socialization in the context of the family: Parent-child interaction. In Heatherington, E. (ed.), Mussen Manual of Child Psychology, Vol. 4, 4th ed., Wiley, New York, pp. 1–102.Google Scholar
  40. Melby, J. and Cogner, R. (1996). Parental behaviors and adolescent academic performance: A longitudinal analysis. J. Res. Adolesc. 6: 113–137.Google Scholar
  41. Piaget, J. (1965/1935). The Moral Judgment of the Child, Routledge & Kegan Paul, London.Google Scholar
  42. Reynolds, C. R., and Richmond, B. O. (1985). The Revised Childhood Manifest Anxiety Scale (RCMAS Manual), Western Psychological Services, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
  43. Ryan, R., Stiller, J., and Lynch, J. (1994). Representations of relationships to teachers, parents, and friends as predictors of academic motivation and self-esteem. J. Early Adolesc. 14: 226–249.Google Scholar
  44. Sroufe, L. A. (1983). Infant-caregiver attachment and patterns of adaptation in preschool: The roots of maladaptation and competence. In Perlmutter, M. (ed.), Development and Policy Concerning Children with Special Needs. Minnesota Symposia on Child Psychology, 16, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 41–83.Google Scholar
  45. Suess, G. J., Grossman, K. E., and Sroufe, L. A. (1992). Effects of infant attachment to mother and father quality of adaptation in preschool: From dyadic to individual organization of self. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 15: 43–65.Google Scholar
  46. Thompson, R. (1998). Early sociopersonality development. In Damon, W. (ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology, 5th ed., Vol. 3. Social, Emotional, and Personality Development (N. Eisenberg, vol. ed.), Wiley, New York, pp. 25–104.Google Scholar
  47. van Ijzendoorn, M. H., Sagi, A., and Lambermon, M. W. E. (1992). The multiple caretaker paradox: Data from Holland and Israel. In Pianta, R. C. (ed.) Beyond the parent: The role of other adults in children's lives (New Directions for Child Development Series, No. 57), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 5–24.Google Scholar
  48. Weinberger, D. A. (1991). Social-emotional adjustment in older children and adults: I. Psychometric properties of the Weinberger Adjustment Inventory, Unpublished manuscript, Case Western Reserve University, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
  49. Youniss, J. (1985). Parents and Peers in Social Development: A Sullivan- Piaget Perspective, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Deborah J. Laible
    • 1
  • Gustavo Carlo
    • 2
  • Marcela Raffaelli
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of NebraskaLincoln
  2. 2.University of NebraskaLincolnUSA
  3. 3.USA

Personalised recommendations