Advertisement

Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 539–556 | Cite as

Culture, Biology, and Evolution: The Mead–Freeman Controversy Revisited

  • Paul Shankman
Article

Abstract

Derek Freeman argues that the central issue in the Mead–Freeman controversy is evolution. He views Margaret Mead's Coming of Age in Samoa as not only misleading about Samoa but as a “sacred text” that promoted an antievolutionary paradigm among American cultural anthropologists. A review of Mead's writing on culture, biology, and evolution demonstrates that contrary to Freeman's claim, Mead favored an evolutionary approach throughout her career. Moreover, while Mead's book was a popular text and a bestseller, it was not a “sacred text” among anthropologists. Freeman's misrepresentation of the historical record concerning Mead's views and the place of Coming of Age in anthropology raises major questions about his scholarship.

Keywords

Historical Record Evolutionary Approach Central Issue Major Question Cultural Anthropologist 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Appell, G. N., and Madan, T. N. (1988). Derek Freeman: Notes toward an intellectual biography. In Appell, G. N., and Madan, T. N. (eds.), Choice and Morality in Anthropological Perspective. State University of New York Press, Albany, pp. 3–30.Google Scholar
  2. Barnouw, V. (1979). Culture and Personality. The Dorsey Press, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  3. Bennett, J. W. (1998). Classic anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 100: 951–956.Google Scholar
  4. Bock, P. (1980). Continuities in Psychological Anthropology:AHistorical Introduction. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.Google Scholar
  5. Bourguignon, E. (1979). Psychological Anthropology: An Introduction to Human Nature and Cultural Differences. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.Google Scholar
  6. Côtè, J. E. (1994). Adolescent Storm and Stress: An Evaluation of the Mead-Freeman Controversy. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ.Google Scholar
  7. Côtè, J. E. (1998). Much ado about nothing: The ‘fateful hoaxing’ of Margaret Mead. Skeptical Inquirer 22(6): 29–34.Google Scholar
  8. Degler, C. (1991). In Search of Human Nature. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. diLeonardo, M. (1998). Exotics at Home: Anthropologies, Others, American Modernity. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
  10. Ehrenreich, B., and McIntosh, J. (1997). The new creationism: Biology under attack. The Nation, June 9: 11–16.Google Scholar
  11. Firth, R. (1936). We the Tikopia. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London.Google Scholar
  12. Foerstel, L., and Gilliam, A. (eds.) (1992). Confronting the Margaret Mead Legacy: Scholarship, Empire, and the South Pacific. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
  13. Freeman, D. (1980). Sociobiology: The ‘antidiscipline’ of anthropology. In Montagu, A. (ed.), Sociobiology Examined. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Freeman, D. (1981). The anthropology of choice: An ANZAAS presidential address given in Auckland, New Zealand, on 24 January, 1979. Canberra Anthropol. 4(1): 82–100.Google Scholar
  15. Freeman, D. (1983a). Margaret Mead and Samoa: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  16. Freeman, D. (1983b). Inductivism and the test of truth: A rejoinder to Lowell D. Holmes and others. Canberra Anthropol. 6(2): 101–192.Google Scholar
  17. Freeman, D. (1987). Review of Holmes 1987. J. Polynes. Soc. 96: 392–400.Google Scholar
  18. Freeman, D. (1992). Paradigms in collision: The far-reaching controversy over the Samoan researches of Margaret Mead and its significance for the human sciences. Academic Questions, Summer: 23–33.Google Scholar
  19. Freeman, D. (1996). Margaret Mead and the Heretic: The Making and Unmaking of an Anthropological Myth. Penguin Books, Ringwood, Australia.Google Scholar
  20. Freeman, D. (1997). Paradigms in collision: Margaret Mead's mistake and what it has done to anthropology. Skeptic 5(3): 66–73.Google Scholar
  21. Freeman, D. (1998). All made of fantasy: A rejoinder to Paul Shankman. Am. Anthropol. 100(4): 972–983.Google Scholar
  22. Freeman, D. (1999a). The Fateful Hoaxing of Margaret Mead: A Historical Analysis of Her Samoan Research. Westview Press, Boulder.Google Scholar
  23. Freeman, D. (1999b). On the ethics of skeptical inquiry. Skeptical Inquirer 23(3): 60, 61.Google Scholar
  24. Hallowell, A. I. (1939). The child, the savage and human experience. In Proceedings of the Sixth Institute on the Exceptional Child, Woods School, Langhorne, PA.Google Scholar
  25. Harris, M. (1983). The sleep-crawling question. Psychol. Today, May: 24–27.Google Scholar
  26. Hays, T. E. (1997). Sacred texts and introductory texts: The case of Mead's Samoa. Pacif. Stud. 20: 81–103.Google Scholar
  27. Heimann, J. M. (1997). The Most Offending Soul Alive: Tom Harrisson and His Remarkable Life. University of Hawaii Press, Honolulu.Google Scholar
  28. Herdt, G., and Leavitt, S. C. (eds.) (1998). Adolescence in Pacific Islands Societies. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.Google Scholar
  29. Honigmann, J. J. (1967). Personality in Culture. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Hsu, F. L. K. (1961). Psychological Anthropology. The Dorsey Press, Inc., Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  31. Hsu, F. L. K. (1972). Psychological Anthropology, (New Ed.). Schenkman, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  32. Hsu, F. L. K. (1980). Margaret Mead and psychological anthropology. Am. Anthropol. 82: 349–353.Google Scholar
  33. Kaplan, B. (ed.) (1961). Studying Personality Cross-Culturally. Harper & Row, New York.Google Scholar
  34. Kardiner, A., Linton, R., DuBois, C., and West, J. (1945). The Psychological Frontiers of Society. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  35. LeVine, R. A. (1973). Culture, Behavior, and Personality. Aldine, Chicago.Google Scholar
  36. Lutkehaus, N. C. (1995). Margaret Mead and the “rustling-of-the-wind-in-the-palm trees school” of ethnographic writing. In Behar, R., and Gordon, D. A. (eds.), Women Writing Culture. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 186–206.Google Scholar
  37. McDowell, N. (1984). Review of Margaret Mead and Samoa. Pacif. Stud. 4: 99–140.Google Scholar
  38. Mead, M. (1928). Coming of Age in Samoa. William Morrow & Company, New York.Google Scholar
  39. Mead, M. (1930). Social organization of Manu'a. In Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin (Vol. 76). Honolulu.Google Scholar
  40. Mead, M. (1935). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Mead, M. (ed.) (1937) Cooperation and Competition Among Primitive Peoples. Beacon Press, Boston.Google Scholar
  42. Mead, M. (1942). Anthropological data on the problem of instinct. Psychosom. Med. 4: 396, 397.Google Scholar
  43. Mead, M. (1947). On the implications for anthropology of the Gesell-Ilg approach to maturation. Am. Anthropol. 49: 69–77.Google Scholar
  44. Mead, M. (1949). Male and Female: A Study of the Sexes in a Changing World. William Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  45. Mead, M. (1950). Sex and Temperament in Three Primitive Societies. William Morrow, New York.Google Scholar
  46. Mead, M. (1958). Cultural determinants of behavior. In Roe, A., and Simpson, G. G. (eds.), Behavior and Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  47. Mead, M. (1961). Anthropology among the sciences. Am. Anthropol. 63: 475–482.Google Scholar
  48. Mead, M. (1964). Continuities in Cultural Evolution. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
  49. Mead, M. (1976). Towards a human science. Science 191(4230): 903–909.Google Scholar
  50. Mitchell, W. E. (1996). Communicating culture: Margaret Mead and the practice of popular anthropology. In MacClancy, J., and McDonaugh, C. (eds.), Popularizing Anthropology. Routledge, New York, pp. 122–135.Google Scholar
  51. Murdock, G. P. (1934). On Primitive Contemporaries. The MacMillan Company, New York.Google Scholar
  52. Nardi, B. (1984). At the height of her powers: Margaret Mead's Samoa. Femin. Stud. 10: 323–337.Google Scholar
  53. Orans, M. (1996). Not Even Wrong: Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman, and the Samoans. Chandler and Sharp Publishers, Inc., Novato, CA.Google Scholar
  54. Orans, M. (1999). Mead misrepresented. Science 283: 1649, 1650.Google Scholar
  55. Rappaport, R. (1987). Letter to the editors. Sci. Am. 256: 6, 7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Rosenblatt, P. (1996). Grief and mourning. In Levinson, D., and Ember, M. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Cultural Anthropology. Henry Holt, New York, pp. 548–549.Google Scholar
  57. Sahlins, M. (1979). Cannibalism: An exchange. New York Review of Books, March 22: 46, 47.Google Scholar
  58. Sanday, P. (1981). The sociocultural context of rape: A cross-cultural study. J. Soc. Issues 37(4): 5–27.Google Scholar
  59. Schlegel, A. (1991). Status, property, and the value on virginity. Am. Ethnol. 18: 719–734.Google Scholar
  60. Schlegel, A., and Barry III, H. (1991). Adolescence: An Anthropological Inquiry. Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  61. Shankman, P. (1983). The Samoan conundrum. Canberra Anthropol. 6(1): 38–57.Google Scholar
  62. Shankman, P. (1996). The history of Samoan sexual conduct and the Mead-Freeman controversy. Am. Anthropol. 98(3): 555–567.Google Scholar
  63. Shankman, P. (1998a). Margaret Mead, Derek Freeman, and the issue of evolution. Skeptical Inquirer 22(6): 35–39.Google Scholar
  64. Shankman, P. (1998b). All things considered: A reply to Derek Freeman. Am. Anthropol. 100(4): 977–979.Google Scholar
  65. Spindler, G. D. (ed.) (1978). The Making of Psychological Anthropology. University of California Press, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  66. Thornhill, R., and Palmer, C. (1999). A Natural History of Rape: The Biological Bases of Sexual Coercion. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  67. Williams, T. R. (1972). Introduction to Socialization: Human Culture Transmitted. C. V. Mosby Company, St. Louis.Google Scholar
  68. Wallace, A. F. C. (1962). Culture and Personality. Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  69. Wallace, A. F. C. (1972). Culture and Personality (2nd Ed.). Random House, New York.Google Scholar
  70. Williamson, D. (1996). The Heretic. Penguin Books, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  71. Wilson, E. O. (1994). Naturalist. Island Press, Washington, DC.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul Shankman
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Anthropology CB 233University of Colorado at Boulder

Personalised recommendations