Journal of Community Health

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 315–329

Older, Hypertensive, and Hypercholesterolemic Fairgoers Visit more Booths and Differ in Their Health Concerns at a Community Health Fair

  • Sarah E. Mess
  • Peter P. Reese
  • David F. Della Lana
  • Alexander Y. Walley
  • Elizabeth P. Ives
  • Michael C. Lee


The purpose of this study was to determine whether persons attending a community health fair had different health concerns and booth visitation patterns based on their risk factor profiles. All fairgoers were encouraged to complete an anonymous survey of demographic information, top 4 health concerns, and selected cardiac risk factors. Over the five-hour duration of the fair, 329 surveys were collected from about 450 fairgoers. There were no exclusion criteria for the survey. The fair was sponsored by the Maryland Chapter of the American College of Physicians, organized by medical students from the University of Maryland and Johns Hopkins University, and included 23 booths on a variety of health topics. Older fairgoers and fairgoers with a self-reported history of high blood pressure or elevated cholesterol showed an increased interest in hypertension and heart disease (p < 0.05). Older fairgoers also showed an increased interest in health topics related to aging, such as estrogen replacement therapy and geriatric medicine. Older, hypertensive and hypercholesterolemic fairgoers visited an increased mean number of total booths when compared to other respondents (p < 0.05). Most booths reported a higher percentage of older, hypertensive, and hypercholesterolemic visitors than the overall percentage of fairgoers who reported these risk factors. These results suggest that booth visitation patterns of health fair participants may be viewed as a deliberate attempt by at-risk populations to access health information particular to their needs.

community health fair education student-organized hypertension hypercholesterolemia 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Berwick, DM. Screening in Health Fairs: A Critical Review of Benefits, Risks, and Costs. JAMA 1985; 254:1492-1498.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berghaus, WCB, Grahm J. Planning and Conducting a Community Health Screening Fair. Middletown, VA. NCCSCE Working Paper Series, Order no. ED-244506, 1982, 13.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Goldman KD, Kloss S, Manes T, Rojewski M. Following up on Screening Test. Public Health Rep 1998; 113:100-101.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lefebvre RC, Harden EA, Rakowski W, Lasater TM, Carleton RA. Characteristics of Participants in Community Health Promotion Programs: Four-Year Results. Am J Public Health 1987; 77:1342-1344.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Werch CE, Schroeder DA, Matthews LL. The Health Fair as a Health Promotion Strategy: Effects on Health Risk Behaviors and the Utility of Specific Health Fair Activities. J Amer Coll Health 1986; 35:74-79.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    McCary J, Schainker E, Liu P. Maryland and Hopkins Medical Students Take to the Street in Baltimore City. Unpublished paper.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baltimore City: Demographic and Socio-Economic Outlook 1995. Maryland Office of Planning, Planning Data Services. Revised Date: August, 1998. <>Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Census Bureau Population Estimates for Maryland's Jurisdictions by Race and Age for 1997. Prepared by the Maryland Office of Planning, Planning Data Services, from the lU.S. Bureau of the Census, Population Estimates Branch, September 1998. <>Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    1990 US Census Data for Baltimore, MD MSA. Database: C90STF1A. <>Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Figures for persons 18 years and older. 1990 US Census Data for Baltimore, MD MSA. Database: C90STF3C1. <>Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Medicaid and Uninsured Facts: Maryland at a Glance: Health Needs Indicators 1995. <>Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Maryland Health Care Access and Cost Commission. State Health Care Expenditures: Experience from 1997. p. 7 <>Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hosmer, David W. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1989.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Household Median Income for Jurisdictions in Maryland. Maryland Office of Planning (OP), Planning Data Services, using data from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census and the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA), November, 1998. <>Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Bletzer KV. Review of a Health Fair Screening Program in Mid-Michigan. J Community Health 1989; 14:149-157.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Heath JM, Lucic KS, Hollifield D, Kues JR. The Health Beliefs of Health Fair Participants. J Community Health 1991; 16:197-203.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah E. Mess
    • 1
  • Peter P. Reese
    • 2
  • David F. Della Lana
    • 3
  • Alexander Y. Walley
    • 4
  • Elizabeth P. Ives
    • 5
  • Michael C. Lee
    • 6
  1. 1.Georgetown University Medical CenterWashington
  2. 2.Brigham & Women's HospitalBoston
  3. 3.University of WashingtonSeattle
  4. 4.Johns Hopkins UniversityBaltimore
  5. 5.University of MarylandBaltimore
  6. 6.Boston University Medical CenterBoston

Personalised recommendations