Journal of Youth and Adolescence

, Volume 29, Issue 2, pp 163–182 | Cite as

Measuring Peer Pressure, Popularity, and Conformity in Adolescent Boys and Girls: Predicting School Performance, Sexual Attitudes, and Substance Abuse

  • Darcy A. Santor
  • Deanna Messervey
  • Vivek Kusumakar


Existing measures of peer pressure and conformity may not be suitable for screening large numbers of adolescents efficiently, and few studies have differentiated peer pressure from theoretically related constructs, such as conformity or wanting to be popular. We developed and validated short measures of peer pressure, peer conformity, and popularity in a sample (n = 148) of adolescent boys and girls in grades 11 to 13. Results showed that all measures constructed for the study were internally consistent. Although all measures of peer pressure, conformity, and popularity were intercorrelated, peer pressure and peer conformity were stronger predictors of risk behaviors than measures assessing popularity, general conformity, or dysphoria. Despite a simplified scoring format, peer conformity vignettes were equal to if not better than the peer pressure measures in predicting risk behavior. Findings suggest that peer pressure and peer conformity are potentially greater risk factors than a need to be popular, and that both peer pressure and peer conformity can be measured with short scales suitable for large-scale testing.


Substance Abuse Great Risk Risk Behavior Strong Predictor Pressure Measure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Bauman, K. E., and Ennett, S. T. (1996). On the importance of peer influence for adolescent drug use: common neglected considerations. Addiction 91: 185–198.Google Scholar
  2. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., and Garbin, M. G. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 8: 77–100.Google Scholar
  3. Brendt, T. J. (1979). Developmental changes in conformity to peers and parents. Develop. Psychol. 15: 606–616.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, B. B. (1982). The extent and effects of peer pressure among high school students:Aretrospective analysis. J. Youth. Adolesc. 11: 121–133.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, B. B., Clasen, D. R., and Eicher, S. E. (1986). Perceptions of peer pressure, peer conformity dispositions, and self-reported behavior among adolescents. J. Personal. Soc. Psychol. 22: 521–530.Google Scholar
  6. Brown, B. B., Lohr, M. J., and McClenahan, E. L. (1986). Early adolescents' perceptions of peer pressure. J. Early Adolesc. 6: 139–154.Google Scholar
  7. Clasen, D. R., and Brown, B. B. (1985). The multidimensionality of peer pressure in adolescence. J. Youth Adolesc. 14: 451–468.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J., and Hendry, L. (1990). The Nature of Adolescence. Routledge, London and New York.Google Scholar
  9. Corcoran, K., and Fisher, J. (1987). Measures for Clinical Practice: A Source Book. The Free Press, New York.Google Scholar
  10. Dielman, T. E., Campanelli, P. C., Shope, J. T., and Butchart, A. T. (1987). Susceptibility to peer pressure, self-esteem and health locus of control as correlates of adolescent substance abuse. Health Educ. Quar. 14: 207–221.Google Scholar
  11. Erikson, E. (1968). Identity, Youth and Crisis. Norton, New York.Google Scholar
  12. Hartup, W.W. (1983). Peer relations. In Heatherington, E. M. (ed.), Mussen, P. H. (series ed.), Handbook of Child Psychology (Vol. 4): Socialization, Personality, and Social Development (pp. 103–196). Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, R. O., Jr. (1982). Adolescent alcohol abuse: A review. Develop. Behav. Pediatr. 3: 83–87.Google Scholar
  14. Gold, M. (1970). Delinquency Behavior in an American City. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA.Google Scholar
  15. Ide, J. K., Parkerson, J. A., Haertel, G. D., and Walberg, H. J. (1981). Peer group influence on educational outcomes: A quantitative analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 73: 472–484.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, G. F., and Rojek, D. G. (1980). Delinquency: A Sociological View. Health, Lexington, MA.Google Scholar
  17. Johnson, M. A. (1989). Concern for appropriateness scale and behavioral conformity. J. Personal. Assess. 53: 567–574.Google Scholar
  18. Keena, K., Loeber, R., Zhang, Q., and Stouthamer, L. M. (1995). The influence of deviant peers on the development of boys' disruptive and delinquent behavior: A temporal analysis. Develop. Psychopath. 7: 715–726.Google Scholar
  19. Newcomer, S. F., Urdy, J. R., and Cameron, F. (1983). Adolescent sexual behavior and popularity. Adolescence 18: 515–522.Google Scholar
  20. Newman, P. R., and Newman, B. M. (1976). Early adolescence and its conflict: Group identity versus alienation. Adolescence 11: 261–274.Google Scholar
  21. Robin, S. S., and Johnson, E. O. (1996). Attitude and peer cross pressure: Adolescent drug use and alcohol use. J. Drug Educ. 26: 69–99.Google Scholar
  22. Santor, D. A., Ramsay, J. O., and Zuroff, D. C. (1994). Nonparametric item analyses of the Beck Depression Inventory. Examining item bias and response option weights in clinical and nonclinical samples. Psycholog. Assess. 6: 255–270.Google Scholar
  23. Steinberg, L. (1987). Familial factors in delinquency: A developmental perspective. J. Adolesc. Res. 2: 255–268.Google Scholar
  24. Steinberg, L., and Silverberg, S. B. (1986). The vicissitudes of autonomy in early adolescence. Child Develop. 57: 841–851.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Darcy A. Santor
    • 1
    • 2
  • Deanna Messervey
    • 3
  • Vivek Kusumakar
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyDalhousie UniversityHalifax
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada
  4. 4.Department of PsychiatryDalhousie UniversityHalifaxCanada

Personalised recommendations