Journal of Community Health

, Volume 25, Issue 6, pp 495–511 | Cite as

Michigan Diabetes Outreach Networks: A Public Health Approach to Strengthening Diabetes Care

  • Sarah L. Krein
  • Mandi L. Klamerus
Article

Abstract

This study describes a statewide public health approach to strengthen diabetes care; evaluates diabetes-related processes of care for individuals enrolled in the Michigan Diabetes Outreach Network (MDON) program; and, examines MDON in the context of priorities for diabetes care and public health policy. Organizational information was obtained through semi-structured interviews. Program outcomes are examined using data from client intake and follow-up assessment forms. We report percentages and mean values overall and across networks. Logistic regression is used to identify factors associated with clients receiving recommended diabetes care. Within two years, five of the networks recruited 125 providers and collected information on over 8,000 individuals with diabetes. The percentage of enrollees with a glycosylated hemoglobin measure, eye exam, and dietician visit is greater at follow-up than at intake and an intake “referral” is strongly associated with clients being treated for high blood pressure at follow-up. The MDON model is a promising public health approach for improving diabetes care but it is necessary to identify program elements that are most effective.

diabetes outreach diabetes networks 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Glasgow RE, Wagner EH, Kaplan RM, Vinicor F, Smith L, Norman J. If diabetes is a public health problem, why not treat it as one? A population-based approach to chronic illness. Ann Behav Med 1999;21:159-170.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Diabetes Fact Sheet: National Estimates and General Information on Diabetes in the United States. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1997.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Roman SH, Harris MI. Management of diabetes mellitus from a public health perspective. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 1997;26:443-474.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    American Diabetes Association. Economic consequences of diabetes mellitus in the U.S. in 1997. Diabetes Care 1998;21:296-309.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Vinicor F. Is diabetes a public-health disorder? Diabetes Care 1994;17:22-27.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Baker SB, Vallbona C, Pavlik V, et al. A diabetes control programin a public health care setting. Public Health Rep 1993;108:595-605.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Diabetes Translation. 1997 Program Review.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Anderson LA, Bruner LA, Satterfield D. Diabetes control programs: new directions. The Diabetes Educator 1995;21:432-438.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Snitgen M. Expanding the home health care paradigm: regionalizing standards of diabetes care. Home Health Care Manage Prac 1996;8:73-78.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Michigan Department of Community Health. Strengthening Diabetes Care in Michigan: The Diabetes Outreach Network Model. Lansing, MI: Michigan Department of Community Health, 1999.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huber P. The behavior of maximum likelihood estimates under non-standard conditions. Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability 1967;1:221-223.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometric 1980;40:817-830.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    StataCorp. Stata Statistical Software: Release 6.0. College Station, TX: Stata Corporation, 1999.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hosmer D, Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1989.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    DeMaris A. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. Sage University paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-086 ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1992.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (UKPDS). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes. UKPDS 38. BMJ 1998;317:703-713.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, et al. Effects of intensive blood-pressure lowering and low-dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomised trial. Lancet 1998;351:1755-1762.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Beckles GLA, Engelgau MM, Narayan KMV, Herman WH, Aubert RE, Williamson DF. Population-based assessment of the level of care among adults with diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care 1998;21:1432-1438.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sarah L. Krein
    • 1
    • 2
  • Mandi L. Klamerus
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Veterans Affairs, Center for Practice Management & Outcomes ResearchVA Ann Arbor Healthcare SystemAnn Arbor
  2. 2.Department of Internal MedicineUniversity of Michigan Medical SchoolAnn Arbor

Personalised recommendations