Advertisement

Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 28, Issue 3, pp 213–226 | Cite as

Task Switching and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

  • Nicholas J. Cepeda
  • Manuel L. Cepeda
  • Arthur F. Kramer
Article

Abstract

The main goal of the present set of studies was to examine the efficiency of executive control processes and, more specifically, the control processes involved in task set inhibition and preparation to perform a new task in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and non-ADHD children. This was accomplished by having ADHD children, both on and off medication, and non-ADHD children perform the task-switching paradigm, which involves the performance of two simple tasks. In nonswitch trials, an individual task is performed repeatedly for a number of trials. In switch trials, subjects must rapidly and accurately switch from one task to the other, either in a predictable or unpredictable sequence. Switch costs are calculated by subtracting performance on the nonswitch trials from performance on the switch trials. These costs are assumed to reflect the executive control processes required for the coordination of multiple tasks. ADHD children showed substantially larger switch costs than non-ADHD children. However, when on medication, the ADHD children's switch performance was equivalent to control children. In addition, medication was observed to improve the ADHD children's ability to inhibit inappropriate responses. These data are discussed in terms of models of ADHD and cognition.

Executive control attention inhibition ADHD child development task switching 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Allport, D. A., Styles, E. A., & Hsieh, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and performance XV (pp. 421–452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, S. W., Damasio, H., Jones, R. D., & Tranel, D. (1991). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test performance as a measure of frontal lobe damage. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 909–922.Google Scholar
  3. Barkley, R. A. Attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Treatment of Childhood Disorders (pp. 39–72). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  4. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 65–94.Google Scholar
  5. Barkley, R. A., & Grodzinsky, G. M. (1994). Are tests of frontal lobe functions useful in the diagnosis of attention deficit disorders? The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 8, 121–139.Google Scholar
  6. Barkley, R. A., Grodzinsky, G., & DuPaul, G. J. (1992). Frontal lobe functions in attention deficit disorder with and without hyperactivity: A review and research report. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 20, 163–188.Google Scholar
  7. Barkley, R. A., Murphy, K. R., & Kwasnik, D. (1996). Psychological adjustment and adaptive impairments in young adults with ADHD. Journal of Attention Disorders, 1, 41–54.Google Scholar
  8. Berg, E. (1948). A simple objective test for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15–22.Google Scholar
  9. Berman, K. F., Ostrem, J. L., Randolph, C., Gold, J., Goldberg, T. E., Coppola, R., Carson, R. E., Herscovitch, P., & Weinberger, D. R. (1995). Physiological activation of a cortical network during performance of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: A positron emission tomography study. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1027–1046.Google Scholar
  10. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529–553.Google Scholar
  11. Douglas, V. I. (1983). Attentional and cognitive problems. In M. Rutter (Ed.), Developmental Neuropsychiatry (pp. 280–329). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
  12. Douglas, V. I. (1988). Cognitive deficits in children with attention deficit disorder with hyperactivity. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. A. Sergeant (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder: Criteria, cognition, intervention (pp. 65–82). London: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Drewe, E. (1974). The effect of type and area of brain lesion on Wisconsin Card Sorting performance. Cortex, 10, 159–170.Google Scholar
  14. Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R. A., Bernzweig, J., Karbon, M., Poulin, R., & Hanish, L. (1993). The relations of emotionality and regulation to preschoolers' social skills and sociometric status. Child Development, 64, 1418–1438.Google Scholar
  15. Eriksen, B., & Eriksen, C. (1974). Effects of noise letters in the identification of target letters in a non-search task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143–149.Google Scholar
  16. Eriksen, C., Coles, M. G. H., Morris, L., & O'Hara, W. (1985). An electromyographic examination of response competition. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 23, 165–168.Google Scholar
  17. Gopher, D. (1996). Attentional control: Explorations of the work of an executive controller. Cognitive Brain Research, 5, 23–38.Google Scholar
  18. Heaton, R. (1981). A manual for the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  19. Jersild, A. T. (1927). Mental set and shift. Archives of Psychology, Whole No. 89.Google Scholar
  20. Kenner, P., Carter, C., Chaderjian, M.,Wolfe, V., & Northcutt, C. (1993, October). Executive function in children with ADHD and controls. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. San Antonio, TX.Google Scholar
  21. Kramer, A. F., Hahn, S., & Gopher, D. (1999). Task coordination and aging: Explorations of executive control processes in the task switching paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 101, 339–378.Google Scholar
  22. Kramer, A. F., Humphrey, D. G., Larish, J. F., Logan, G. D., & Strayer, D. L. (1994). Aging and inhibition: Beyond a unitary view of inhibitory processing in attention. Psychology and Aging, 9, 491–512.Google Scholar
  23. Lauber, E., Meyer, D. E., Gmeindl, L., Evans, J., & Kieras, D. E. (1996). The executive processes involved in task switching. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the Psychonomic Society. Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
  24. Lou, H. C., Henriksen, L., Bruhn, P., Borner, H., & Nielsen, J. B. (1989). Striatal dysfunction in attention deficit and hyperkinetic disorder. Archives of Neurology, 46, 825–829.Google Scholar
  25. Meyer, D. E., & Karis, D. (1997). A computational theory of executive control processes and multiple-task performance: Part I. Basic Mechanisms. Psychological Review, 104, 3–65.Google Scholar
  26. Merian, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 22, 1423–1442.Google Scholar
  27. Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90–100.Google Scholar
  28. Neill, T. W., & Valdes, L. A. (1996). Facilitatory and inhibitory aspects of attention. In A. F. Kramer, M. G. H. Coles & G. D. Logan (Eds.), Converging operations in the study of visual selective attention (pages, 77–106). Washington, DC: APA Press.Google Scholar
  29. Norman, D., & Shallice, T. (1986). Attention to action: Willed and automatic control of behavior. In R. J. Davidson, G. E. Schwartz & D. Shapiro (Eds.), Consciousness and self-regulation. New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  30. Pelham, W. E., & Bender, M. E. (1982). Peer relationships in hyperactive children: Description and treatment. In K. D. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (Vol. 1, pp. 365–436). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pennington, B. F., Grossier, D., & Welsh, M. C. (1993). Contrasting cognitive deficits in attention deficit disorder versus reading disability. Developmental Psychology, 29, 511–523.Google Scholar
  32. Pennington, B. F., & Ozonoff, S. (1996). Executive functions and developmental psychopathology. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37, 51–87.Google Scholar
  33. Quay, H. C. (1996). Gray's behavioral inhibition in ADHD: An update. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the International Society for Research in Child and Adolescent Psychopathology. Los Angeles, CA.Google Scholar
  34. Quay, H. C. (1988). Attention deficit disorder and the behavioral inhibition system: The relevance of the neuropsychological theory of Jeffrey A. Gray. In L. M. Bloomingdale & J. Sergeant (Eds.), Attention deficit disorder: Criteria, cognition, intervention (pp. 117–126). NY: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
  35. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207–231.Google Scholar
  36. Rosenbaum, M., & Baker, E. (1984). Self-controlled behavior in hyperactive and nonhyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 12, 303–318.Google Scholar
  37. Rubinstein, J., Meyer, D. E., & Evans, J. E. (in press). Executive control of cognitive processes in task switching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. Google Scholar
  38. Schachar, R. J., Tannock, R., & Logan, G. (1993). Inhibitory control, impulsiveness, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Psychology Review, 13, 721–739.Google Scholar
  39. Schachar, R., Tannock, R., Marriott, M., & Logan, G. (1995). Deficient inhibitory control in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 411–437.Google Scholar
  40. Seidman, L. J., Biederman, J., Faraone, S. V., Milberger, S., Norman, D., Seiverd, K., Benedict, K., Guite, J., Mick, E., & Kiely, K. (1995). Effects of family history and comorbidity on the neuropsychological performance of children with ADHD: Preliminary findings. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 34, 1015–1024.Google Scholar
  41. Sergeant, J. A., & Scholter, C. A. (1985). On resource strategy limitations in hyperactivity: Cognitive impulsivity reconsidered. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 26(1), 97–109.Google Scholar
  42. Sergeant, J. A. (1996). A theory of attention: An information processing perspective. In G. R. Lyon & N. A. Krasnegor (Eds.), Attention, memory and executive function, (pages 57–69). Baltimore: Brooks.Google Scholar
  43. Shallice, T. (1994). Multiple levels of control processes. In C. Umilta & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Attention and Performance XV. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sternberg, G. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276–315.Google Scholar
  45. Sieg, K. G., Gaffney, G. R., Preston, D. F., & Hellings, J. A. (1995). SPEC brain imaging abnormalities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 20, 55–60.Google Scholar
  46. Tannock, R., Schachar, R., Carr, R., Chajczyk, D., & Logan, G. (1989). Effects of methylphenidate on inhibitory control in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 17, 473–491.Google Scholar
  47. Tannock, R., Schachar, R., & Logan, G. (1995). Methylphendiate and cognitive flexibility: Dissociated dose effects in hyperactive children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 23, 235–266.Google Scholar
  48. Zentall, S. S. (1985). A context for hyperactivity. In K. D. Gadow & I. Bialer (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities (vol 4., pages 273–343). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Plenum Publishing Corporation 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicholas J. Cepeda
    • 1
  • Manuel L. Cepeda
    • 2
  • Arthur F. Kramer
    • 1
  1. 1.Beckman Institute and Department of PsychologyUniversity of Illinois at Urbana–ChampaignUSA
  2. 2.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of South AlabamaUSA

Personalised recommendations