Synthese

, Volume 114, Issue 2, pp 233–276 | Cite as

The Structure of Predication

  • Alessandro Lenci
Article

Abstract

The paper discusses the structure of non-verbal predication, with particular reference to the role of the copula. Differently from the main tenets of contemporary logico-philosophical and linguistic theories, a model of predication is proposed where the verbal component (specifically, tense information) is regarded as central in establishing the syntactic and semantic relation between a predicate and its subject. It is thus possible to recover some of the insights of the pre-Fregean analysis of predication. The proposed solution has a number of significant consequences for the structure to be assigned to non-verbal predication, in particular for the semantics of ‘small clause’ constituents, where the predication is established without the copula.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. Ackrill, J. L.: 1963, Aristotle's Categories and De Interpretatione, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  2. Ackrill, J. L. (ed.): 1987, A New Aristotle Reader, Clarendon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
  3. Bailly, A.: 1846, Grammaire générale et raisonnée de Port-Royal, Paris.Google Scholar
  4. Belardi, W.: 1975, Il linguaggio nella filosofia di Aristotele, Libreria K., Roma.Google Scholar
  5. Benveniste, É.: 1966, Problèmes de linguistique générale, Gallimard, Paris.Google Scholar
  6. Bowers, J.: 1993, ‘The Syntax of Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 24, 591–656.Google Scholar
  7. Cardinaletti, A. and M. T. Guasti: 1993, ‘Negation in Epistemic Small Clauses’, Probus 5, 39–61.Google Scholar
  8. Cardinaletti, A. and M. T. Guasti (eds.): 1995, Syntax and Semantics. Vol. XXVIII: Small Clauses, Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Chomsky, N.: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding, Foris, Dordrecht.Google Scholar
  10. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language, its Nature, Origin, and Use, Praeger, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Chomsky, N.: 1995, The Minimalist Program, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  12. Davidson, D.: 1967, ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, pp. 81–95.Google Scholar
  13. Déchaine, R.-M.: 1993, Predicates across Categories, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.Google Scholar
  14. De Mauro, T. and A. Thornton: 1985, ‘La predicazione: teoria e applicazione all'italiano’, in Sintassi e morfologia della lingua Italina d'uso: teorie ed applicazioni descrittive, Bulzoni, Roma, pp. 487–519.Google Scholar
  15. De Rijk, L. M.: 1956, Petrus Abaelardus. Dialectica, Van Gorcum, Assen.Google Scholar
  16. Frege, G.: 1986, Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, B. McGuinness (ed.), Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. Geach, P.: 1962, Reference and Generality, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.Google Scholar
  18. Graffi, G.: 1986, ‘Una nota sui concetti di ρ\(\hat \eta \)μα e λόγος in Aristotele’, Athenaeum 74, 91–101.Google Scholar
  19. Guéron, J. and T. Hoekstra: 1995, ‘The Temporal Interpretation of Predication’, in A. Cardinaletti and M. T. Guasti (1995), pp. 77–107.Google Scholar
  20. Heycock, C. B.: 1994, Layers of Predication. The Non-Lexical Syntax of Clauses, Garland, New York.Google Scholar
  21. Higginbotham, J.: 1983, ‘The Logic of Perceptual Reports: an Extensional Alternative to Situation Semantics’, Journal of Philosophy 80, 100–127.Google Scholar
  22. Higginbotham, J.: 1985, ‘On Semantics’, Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547–593Google Scholar
  23. Higginbotham, J.: 1989, ‘Elucidations of Meaning’, Linguistics and Philosophy 12, 465–517.Google Scholar
  24. Hornstein, N.: 1995, Logical Form. From GB to Minimalism, Blackwell, Oxford.Google Scholar
  25. Jespersen, O.: 1924, The Philosophy of Grammar, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  26. Jespersen, O.: 1949, A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles. Part III, Syntax, Second Volume, Allen and Unwin, London.Google Scholar
  27. Kahn, C. H.: 1973, The Verb ‘Be’ in Ancient Greek, Reidel, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  28. Meillet, A.: 1906, ‘La phrase nominale en indo—européen’, Mémoires du la Société de Linguistique de Paris 14, 1–26.Google Scholar
  29. Mill, J. Stuart: 1906, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, 8th ed., Longman, London [1st ed. 1843].Google Scholar
  30. Montague, R.: 1973, ‘The Proper Treatment of Quantification in Ordinary English’, in J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 221–242.Google Scholar
  31. Moro, A.: 1995, ‘Small Clauses with Predicative Nominals’, in A. Cardinaletti and M. T. Guasti (1995), pp. 109–132.Google Scholar
  32. Moro, A.: 1997, The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  33. Napoli, D. J.: 1989, Predication Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  34. Parsons, T.: 1990, Events in the Semantics of English, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  35. Partee, B. H. and M. Rooth: 1983, ‘Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity’, in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use, and Interpretation of Language, De Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361–383.Google Scholar
  36. Rothstein, S.: 1983, The Syntactic Form of Predication, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  37. Searle, J. R.: 1969, Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language, Cambridge, University Press Cambridge.Google Scholar
  38. Stowell, T.: 1978, ‘What Was There before There Was There’, in D. Farkas (ed.), Papers from the Fourteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, pp. 458–471.Google Scholar
  39. Stowell, T.: 1981, Origins of Phrase Structure, Ph.D. dissertation, MIT, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
  40. Stowell, T.: 1991, ‘Small Clause Restructuring’, in R. Freidin (ed.), Principles and Parameters in Comparative Grammar, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, pp. 182–218.Google Scholar
  41. Strange, S. K.: 1992, Porphyry: On Aristotle Categories, Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
  42. Svenonius, P. A.: 1994, Dependent Nexus. Subordinate Predication Structures in English and the Scandinavian Languages, Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
  43. Williams, E.: 1980, ‘Predication’, Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–238.Google Scholar
  44. Williams, E.: 1983, ‘Against Small Clauses’, Linguistic Inquiry 14, 287–308.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandro Lenci
    • 1
  1. 1.Dipartimento di FilosofiaUniversitá degli Studi di PisaPisa (Italy)

Personalised recommendations