, Volume 110, Issue 3, pp 399–417


  • Michael Bergmann

DOI: 10.1023/A:1004993228686

Cite this article as:
Bergmann, M. Synthese (1997) 110: 399. doi:10.1023/A:1004993228686


Despite various attempts to rectify matters, the internalism-externalism (I-E) debate in epistemology remains mired in serious confusion. I present a new account of this debate, one which fits well with entrenched views on the I-E distinction and illuminates the fundamental disagreements at the heart of the debate. Roughly speaking, the I-E debate is over whether or not certain of the necessary conditions of positive epistemic status are internal. But what is the sense of ‘internal’ here? And of which conditions of which positive epistemic status are we speaking? I argue that an adequate answer to these questions requires reference to what I call the no-defeater condition which is satisfied by a subject’s belief B just in case she does not believe that B is defeated. I close by stating succinctly the main positions taken in the I-E debate, identifying the basic points of disagreement and suggesting fruitful courses for future discussion.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1997

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael Bergmann
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of Notre DameNotre DameU.S.A

Personalised recommendations