Advertisement

Journal of the History of Biology

, Volume 32, Issue 3, pp 509–555 | Cite as

Taxonomy and the Personal Equation: The Historical Fates of Charles Girard and Louis Agassiz

  • James R. Jackson
  • William C. Kimler
Article

Abstract

The reputations of scientists among their contemporaries depend not only on accomplishment, but also on interactions affected by influence and personality. The historical lore of most fields of scientific endeavor preserve these reputations, often through the identification of founders, innovators, and prolific workers whose contributions are considered fundamental to progress in the field. Historians frequently rely on the historical lore of scientists to guide their studies of the development of ideas, exhibiting justifiable caution in reassessing reputations in the light of current knowledge. However, the transmission of historical lore can obscure the relative importance of accomplishment, influence and personality in shaping contemporary reputations, leaving the historian to either accept reputations at face value or attempt to reconstruct the context in which they were created. The science of taxonomy, because of its rules of priority, leaves a relatively accurate record of historical accomplishment through the persistence of taxa in catalogues and faunal guides. These records allow the modern historian an unbiased means to assess the relative accomplishments of historical figures and therefore a means to critically reassess reputations independent of personality and influence. In the historical lore of North American ichthyology, Louis Agassiz at Harvard and Spencer Baird at the Smithsonian emerge as central figures in the early development of the field during the mid-1800s, contributing not only through the quality and quantity of their science, but also through their roles as institutional leaders and mentors to workers who followed. Charles Girard, originally a student of Agassiz's and later a coworker with Baird, receives little notice in the history of ichthyology, and his reputation is that of a minor player in the initial description of the North American fish fauna, and one whose work appears to have been flawed or even careless when compared to his contemporaries. However, a review of both contemporary and modern taxonomic works reveals that Girard's productivity far exceeded that of either Agassiz or Baird. Furthermore, an examination of the tendency of Girard and his contemporaries to introduce synonymous names into the literature, which might reflect careless or uncritical work, suggests that Girard was among the more accomplished workers of hisera, including Agassiz and Baird. Girard's low ranking in the folklore of North American ichthyology, therefore, can not be attributed to discernible shortcomings in his scientific work, but rather to a public and private campaign of criticism waged by Agassiz after Girard's departure from Harvard. While Agassiz's dispute with Girard stemmed from their personal interactions, he expressed them as criticisms of Girard's work, and thus helped shape Girard's scientific reputation as it has been transmitted through the lore of ichthyology. This case study reveals how scientific reputation may not always rest on accomplishment, but can be influenced by personal interactions obscured by time but nonetheless important to history.

Louis Agassiz Spencer Baird Charles Girard reputation taxonomy ichthyology Museum of Comparative Zoology Smithsonian Institution 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbott, Charles C. 1860. “Descriptions of New Species of American Fresh-Water Fishes. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 12: 325–328.Google Scholar
  2. L'Académie des Sciences. 1861. Comptes rendus hebdomadaires des séances de l'Académie des Sciences 52: 594–596.Google Scholar
  3. Agassiz, Louis. 1850a. Lake Superior: Its Physical Character, Vegetation, and Animals, Compared with Those of Other and Similar Regions. By Louis Agassiz. With a Narrative of the Tour, by J. Elliot Cabot. And Contributions by Other Scientific Gentlemen. Boston: Gould, Kendall and Lincoln.Google Scholar
  4. —— 1850b. “Remarks on Species Belonging to the Genus Lepidosteus. ” Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. Hist. 3: 182.Google Scholar
  5. —— 1854a. “Additional Notes on the Holoconoti. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 17: 365–369.Google Scholar
  6. —— 1854b. “Notice of a Collection of Fishes from the Southern Bend of the Tennessee River, in the State of Alabama. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 17: 297–308, 353–365.Google Scholar
  7. —— 1854c. “The Primitive Diversity and Number of Animals in Geological Times. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 17: 308–324.Google Scholar
  8. —— 1855. “Synopsis of the Ichthyological Fauna of the Pacific Slope of North America, Chiefly from the Collections made by the U.S. Expl. Exped. Under the Command of Capt. C.Wilkes, with Recent Additions and Comparisons with Eastern Types. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 19: 71–99, 215–231.Google Scholar
  9. —— 1857. “Essay on Classification. ” In Contributions to the Natural History of the United States, Vol 1. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  10. —— 1857–1862. Contributions to the Natural History of the United States. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
  11. —— 1860. “Individuality and Specific Differences Among Acalephs. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 30: 142–154.Google Scholar
  12. —— 1874. “Evolution and Permanence of Type. ” Atlantic Monthly 33: 92–101.Google Scholar
  13. Allard, Dean Conrad, Jr. 1878. Spencer Fullerton Baird and the U.S. Fish Commission. New York: Arno.Google Scholar
  14. American Association for the Advancement of Science. 1850. Membership list. Proc. Amer. Ass. Ad. Sci. 2: xiii.Google Scholar
  15. Bailey, Reeve M. and Uyeno, Teruya. 1964. “Nomenclature of the Blue Chub and the Tui Chub, Cyprinid Fishes from Western United States. ” Copeia 1964: 238–239.Google Scholar
  16. Baird, Spencer Fullerton. 1857. Reports of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economical Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. Volume 8. Mammals. Washington, D.C.: Nicholson.Google Scholar
  17. —— 1858. Reports of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economical Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. Volume 9. Birds. Washington, D.C.: Nicholson.Google Scholar
  18. Baird, Spencer Fullerton and Girard, Charles Frederic. 1853a. “Descriptions of New Species of Fishes Collected by Mr. John H. Clark, on the U.S. and Mexican Boundary Survey, under Lt. Col. Jas. D. Graham. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 6: 387–390.Google Scholar
  19. —— 1853b. “Descriptions of New Species of Fishes, Collected by Captains R.B. Marcy, and Geo. B. M'Clellun, in Arkansas. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 6: 390–392.Google Scholar
  20. —— 1854. “Descriptions of New Species of Fishes Collected in Texas, New Mexico and Sonora, by Mr. John H. Clark, on the U.S. and Mexican Boundary Survey, and in Texas by Capt. Stewart Van Vliet, U.S.A.” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 7: 24–29.Google Scholar
  21. Barlow, George F. 1961. “Causes and Significance of Morphological Variation in Fishes. ” Sys. Zool. 10: 105–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bleeker, Pieter. 1860. De visschen van den Indischen Archipel breschreven en toegelicht. Deel II. Cyprini. In Ichthyologiae Archipelagi Indici prodomus. Batavia: Lange.Google Scholar
  23. Briggs, John C. 1986. “Introduction to the Zoogeography of North American Fishes. ” In The Zoogeography of North American Freshwater Fishes, ed. Charles H. Hocutt and E.O. Wiley, pp. 1–16. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Bruce, Robert V. 1987. The Launching of Modern American Science 1846–1876. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
  25. Burr, Brooks M. 1980. “Campostoma anomalum (Rafinesque) – Stoneroller. ” In Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, ed. David S. Lee et al., p. 143. Raleigh: North Carolina State Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  26. Clay, William M. 1975. The Fishes of Kentucky. Frankfort: Kentucky Department of Fish and Wildlife Resources.Google Scholar
  27. Cooper, Lane. 1945. Louis Agassiz as a Teacher: Illustrative Extracts on his Method of Instruction. Ithaca: Comstock.Google Scholar
  28. Cope, Edward Drinker. 1869. “On the Distribution of Freshwater Fishes in the Allegheny Region of Southwestern Virginia. ” J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 6: 207–248.Google Scholar
  29. Dall, William Healy. 1915. Spencer Fullerton Baird: A Biography. Philadelphia: Lippincott.Google Scholar
  30. DeKay, James Ellsworth. 1842. Zoology of New York. Part IV. Fishes. Albany, New York: White and Visschen.Google Scholar
  31. Dexter, Ralph W. 1964. “Some Remarks on Nomenclature by Scudder, Haldeman, Gray, and Baird (1868–1869). ” Sys. Zool. 13: 96–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. —— 1970. “Historical Aspects of F.W. Putnam's Studies of Fishes. ” J. Hist. Biol. 3: 131–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Eschmeyer, William N. 1990. Catalog of the Genera of Recent Fishes. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
  34. Forman, Paul. 1991. “Independence, Not Transcendence, for the Historian of Science. ” Isis 82: 71–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gibbons, William P. 1854a. “Description of Four New Species of Viviparous Fishes from Sacramento River, and the Bay of San Francisco. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 7: 105–106.Google Scholar
  36. —— 1854b. “Description of New Species of Viviparous Marine and Fresh-Water Fishes, from the Bay of San Francisco, and from the River and Lagoons of the Sacramento. ” Proc. cad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 7: 122–126.Google Scholar
  37. Gill, Theodore Nicholas. 1862. “Catalogue of the fishes of Lower California, in the Smithsonian Institution, collected by Mr. J. Xantus. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 14: 80–88.Google Scholar
  38. Girard, Charles Frederic. Papers, circa 1846–1860, and undated, Record Unit 7190, Collection Division 1: Manuscripts, speeches, correspondence, notes, and related materials, 1846–1854, and undated. Box 1, Folder 5: Copies of correspondence and statements by Girard regarding a dispute with Louis Agassiz, 1852. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Archives.Google Scholar
  39. —— 1851. “An Essay on the Classification of Nemertes and Planariæ: Preceded by Some General Considerations on the Primary Divisions of the Animal Kingdom. ” Amer. J. Sci. Arts 11: 41–53.Google Scholar
  40. —— 1852a. “Contributions to the Natural History of the Fresh-Water Fishes of North America. I. Monograph of Cottoids. ” Smithsonian Contrib. Knowl. 3.Google Scholar
  41. —— 1852b. “On the Classification of Mammalia. ” Proc. Amer. Ass. Ad. Sci. 4: 319–334.Google Scholar
  42. —— 1854. “Descriptions of New Fishes, Collected by Dr. A.L. Heermann, Naturalist Attached to the Survey of the Pacific Railroad Route, under Lieut. R.S. Williamson, U.S.A.” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 7: 129–140.Google Scholar
  43. —— 1856. “Researches upon the Cyprinoid Fishes Inhabiting the Fresh Waters of the United States of America, West of the Mississippi Valley, from Specimens in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 8: 165–213.Google Scholar
  44. —— 1858. Reports of Explorations and Surveys to Ascertain the Most Practicable and Economical Route for a Railroad from the Mississippi River to the Pacific Ocean. Volume 10. Fishes. Washington, D.C.: Nicholson.Google Scholar
  45. —— 1859. Report on the United States and Mexican Boundary Survey; Made under the Direction of the Secretary of the Interior. Volume 2, Part 2. Fishes. Washington, D.C.: Cornelius Wendell.Google Scholar
  46. Girard, Charles Frederic and Baird, Spencer Fullerton. 1853. Catalogue of North American Reptiles in the Museum of the Smithsonian Institution. Part I. Serpents. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  47. Goetzmann, William H. 1959. Army Exploration in the American West 1803–1863. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Goode, George Browne. 1883. “Bibliographies of American Naturalists: The Published Writings of Spencer Fullerton Baird, 1843–1882. ” Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 20: 255–269.Google Scholar
  49. —— 1891. “Bibliographies of American Naturalists: The Published Writings of Dr. Charles Girard. ” Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. 41: i–vi, 1–141.Google Scholar
  50. Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Cambridge: Belknap Press at Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  51. Herber, Elmer Charles. 1963. Correspondence between Spencer Fullerton Baird and Louis Agassiz – Two Pioneer American Naturalists. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  52. Holbrook, John Edwards. 1855. “An Account of Several Species of Fish Observed in Florida, Georgia, & c.” J. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 3: 47–58.Google Scholar
  53. Hoole, William Stanley. 1962. Introduction to A Visit to the Confederate States of America in 1863: Memoir Addressed to His Majesty Napoleon III, by Charles Frederic Girard. Tuscaloosa, Alabama: Confederate Publishing Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  54. Hubbs, Carl Leavitt. 1930. “Materials for the Revision of the Catostomid Fishes of Eastern North America. ” Miscell. Publ. Mus. Zool. Univ. Michigan 20: 1–47.Google Scholar
  55. —— 1961. “Isolating Mechanisms in the Speciation of Fishes. ” In Vertebrate Speciation, ed W.F. Blair, pp. 5–23. Austin: University of Texas PressGoogle Scholar
  56. —— 1964a. “David Starr Jordan. ” Sys. Zool. 13: 195–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. —— 1964b. “History of Ichthyology in the United States after 1850. ” Copeia 1964: 42–60.Google Scholar
  58. Hubbs, Carl Leavitt and Ortenburger, A. I. 1929. “Further Notes on the Fishes of Oklahoma with Descriptions of New Species of Cyprinidae. ” Publ. Univ. Oklahoma Biol. Sur. 1(2): 17–43.Google Scholar
  59. Hull, David L. 1965. “The Effect of Essentialism on Taxonomy – Two Thousand Years of Stasis (I & II). ” Brit. J. Phil. Sci. 15: 314–326; 16: 1–18.Google Scholar
  60. —— 1979. “In Defense of Presentism. ” Hist. Theory 18: 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Jordan, David Starr. 1885. “Identification of the species of Cyprinidae and Catostomidae, Described by Dr. Charles Girard, in the Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia for 1856. ” Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 8: 118–127.Google Scholar
  62. —— 1896. Science Sketches. Chicago: McClung.Google Scholar
  63. —— 1902. “The History of Ichthyology. ” Science 16: 241–258.Google Scholar
  64. —— 1923. “Spencer Fullerton Baird and the United States Fish Commission. ” Sci. Monthly 17: 97–107.Google Scholar
  65. Jordan, David Starr and Evermann, Barton Warren. 1896. “The Fishes of North and Middle America: A Descriptive Catalogue of the Species of Fish-Like Vertebrates Found in the Waters of North America, North of the Isthmus of Panama. ” In Bull. U.S. Nat. Mus. No. 47. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  66. Jordan, David Starr and Gilbert, Charles Henry. 1877. “On the Genera of North American Fresh-Water Fishes. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 29: 83–104.Google Scholar
  67. Kirtland, Jared Potter. 1840–1845. “Descriptions of the Fishes of the Ohio River and Its Tributaries. ” Boston J. Nat. Hist. 3: 338–352, 469–482; 4: 16–26; 4: 303–308; 5: 21–32.Google Scholar
  68. —— 1842–1846. “Descriptions of the Fishes of Lake Erie, the Ohio River and Their Tributaries. ” Boston J. Nat. Hist. 4: 231–240; 5: 265–276; 5: 330–344.Google Scholar
  69. Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory. 1976. The Formation of the American Scientific Community: The American Association for the Advancement of Science 1848–1860. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  70. Lurie, Edward. 1960. Louis Agassiz: A Life in Science. Chicago: Univ. of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  71. Marcou, Jules. 1895. Life, Letters, and Works of Louis Agassiz. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  72. Mayden, Richard L. (ed.). 1992. Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Mayden, Richard L. and Gilbert, Carter R. 1989. “Notropis ludibundus (Girard) and Notropis tristis (Girard), Replacement Names for N. stramineus (Cope) and N. topeka (Gilbert) (Teleostei: Cypriniformes). ” Copeia 1989: 1084–1089.Google Scholar
  74. Mayden, Richard L., Matson, R. H. and Hillis, D. M. 1992. “Speciation in the North American Genus Dionda. ” In Systematics, Historical Ecology, and North American Freshwater Fishes, ed. Richard L. Mayden. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  75. Mayr, Ernst. 1959. “Agassiz, Darwin, and Evolution. ” Harvard Lib. Bull. 13: 165–194.Google Scholar
  76. —— 1991. One Long Argument: Charles Darwin and the Genesis of Modern Evolutionary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Myers, George S. 1964. “A Brief Sketch of the History of Ichthyology in America to the Year 1850. ” Copeia 1964: 33–41.Google Scholar
  78. Orosz, Joel J. 1970. “Disloyalty, Dismissal, and a Deal: The Development of the National Museum at the Smithsonian Institution. ” Mus. Stud. J. 2: 22–33.Google Scholar
  79. —— 1990. Curators and Culture: The Museum Movement in America, 1740–1870. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  80. Poey y Aloy, Felipe. 1854 [1851–1858]. Memorias sobre la historia natural de la isla de Cuba: acompañadas de sumarios latinos y extractos en francés. Havana: Barcina.Google Scholar
  81. Purcell, Rosamund Wolff and Gould, Stephen Jay. 1992. Finders, Keepers: Treasures and Oddities of Natural History. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  82. Putnam, Frederic Ward. 1863. “List of Fishes Sent by the Museum to Different Institutions, in the Exchange for other Specimens, with Annotations. ” Bull. Mus. Compar. Zool. 1: 1–16.Google Scholar
  83. Reingold, Nathan. 1964. Science in Nineteenth-Century America: A Documentary History. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  84. Rieppel, Olivier. 1988. “Louis Agassiz (1807–1873) and the Reality of Natural Groups. ” Biol. Phil. 3: 29–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rivinus, E. F. and Youssef, E. M. 1992. Spencer Baird of the Smithsonian. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  86. Robins, C. Richard. 1961. “Two New Cottid Fishes from the Fresh Waters of the Eastern United States. ” Copeia 196: 305–315.Google Scholar
  87. Robins, C. Richard et al. 1991. A List of Common and Scientific Names of Fishes from the United States and Canada, 5th edn. Bethesda, Maryland: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
  88. Smith-Vaniz, William F. and McCracken Peck, Robert. 1991. “Contributions of Henry Weed Fowler (1878–1965), with a Brief Early History of Ichthyology at the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. ” Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Phila. 143: 173–191.Google Scholar
  89. Smithsonian Institution. 1862. Annual Report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution for 1861. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  90. Storer, David Humphries. 1855. “A History of the Fishes of Massachusetts. ” Mem. Amer. Acad. Arts and Sci. 5: 49–92, 122–168, 257–296.Google Scholar
  91. Storer, Horatio Robinson. 1850. “Observations on the Fishes of Nova Scotia and Labrador, with Descriptions of New Species. ” Boston J. Nat. Hist. 6: 247–270.Google Scholar
  92. Trautman, Milton B. 1981. The Fishes of Ohio, rev. edn. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Wall, B. R., Jr. and Gilbert, Carter R. 1980. “Erimyzon sucetta (Lacepede), Lake Chubsucker. ” In Atlas of North American Freshwater Fishes, ed. David S. Lee et al. p. 399. Raleigh: North Carolina State Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  94. Washburn, Wilcomb E. 1965. “The Museum and Joseph Henry. ” Curator 8: 35–54.Google Scholar
  95. Watson, George E. 1985. “Vertebrate Collections: Lost Opportunities. ” In Magnificent Voyagers: The U.S. Exploring Expedition, 1838–1842, ed. Herman J. Viola and Carolyn Margolis, pp. 43–69. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
  96. Wiley, E. O. 1976. “The Phylogeny and Biogeography of Fossil and Recent Gars (Actinopterygii: Lepisosteidae). ” Miscellaneous Publications of the Museum of Natural History of the University of Kansas 64.Google Scholar
  97. Winsor, Mary Pickard. 1979. “Louis Agassiz and the Species Question. ” Stud. Hist. of Biol. 3: 89–117.Google Scholar
  98. —— 1990. Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  99. —— 1994. “The Lessons of History. ” In Models in Phylogeny Reconstruction, ed. Robert W. Scotland, Darrell J. Siebert and David M. Williams, pp. 1–9. Systematics Association Special Volume No. 52. Oxford: Clarendon Press for the Systematics Association.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • James R. Jackson
    • 1
  • William C. Kimler
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of ZoologyNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighU.S.A
  2. 2.Department of HistoryNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighU.S.A

Personalised recommendations