Plant and Soil

, Volume 222, Issue 1–2, pp 203–214 | Cite as

Spatial heterogeneity of soil respiration and related properties at the plant scale

  • Helmut Stoyan
  • Helvecio De-Polli
  • Sven Böhm
  • G. Philip Robertson
  • Eldor A. Paul
Article

Abstract

Geostatistical techniques were used to quantify the scale and degree of soil heterogeneity in 2 m2 plots around 9-year-old poplar trees and within a wheat field. Samples were taken during two years, on an unaligned grid, for analysis of soil respiration, C and N content, available P, gravimetric moisture, pH, nitrification potential, and root biomass. Kriged maps of soil respiration, moisture, and C content showed strong spatial structure associated with poplar trees but not with wheat rows. All soil properties showed higher autocorrelation in June than in April. Isopleth patchiness for all variates was less in June. This was associated with lower respiration rates due to lower litter decomposition. From the degree and scale of heterogeneity seen in this study, we conclude that the main causes of soil heterogeneity at this scale (2 m2) are likely to be found at micro scales controlled in part by plant root and plant residue patterns. These must be understood in the evaluation of ecosystem processes.

carbon geostatistics nitrification potential nitrogen pH root biomass soil respiration spatial Heterogeneity variability scale 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aiken R M, Jawson M D, Grahmmer K and Polymenopoulos A D 1991 Positional, spatially correlated and random components of variability in carbon dioxide efflux. J. Environ. Quality 20, 301–308.Google Scholar
  2. Amador J A, Glucksman A M, Lyons J B and Goerres J H 1997 Spatial distribution of soil phosphatase activity within a Riparian forest. Soil Sci. 162, 808–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beare M H, Coleman D C, Crossby D A, Hendrix D F and Odum E P 1995 A hierarchical approach to evaluating the significance of biodiversity to biochemical cycling. Plant Soil 170, 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ben-Asher J, Cardon G E, Peters D, Rolston D E, Biggar JW, Phene C J and Ephrath J E 1994 Determining root activity distribution by measuring surface carbon dioxide fluxes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. 58, 926–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bouwmann A F and Germon J C 1998 Special issue-Soils and climate change-Introduction. Biol. Fert. Soils 27, 219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cambardella C A, Moorman T B, Novak J M, Parkin T B, Karlen D L, Turco F F and Konopka A E 1994 Field-Scale variability of soil properties in Central Iowa Soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58, 1501–1511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cressie N A C 1993 Statistics for Spatial Data. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Deutsch V C and Journel A G 1998 GSLIB: Geostatistical Software Library and User's Guide. Oxford University Press, New York.Google Scholar
  9. Gamma Design 1995 GS+: Geostatistical software for the agronomic and biological sciences. Plainwell, Michigan.Google Scholar
  10. Goovaerts P 1998 Geostatistical tools for characterizing the spatial variability of microbiological and physico-chemical soil properties. Biol. Fert. Soils 27(4), 315–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goovaerts P 1999 Geostatistics in soil science: state-of-the-art and perspectives. Geoderma 89(1-2), 1–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goovaerts P and Chiang C N 1993 Temporal persistence of spatial patterns for mineralizable nitrogen and selected soil properties. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 57, 372–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grahammer K, Jawson M D and Skopp J 1991 Day and night soil respiration from a grassland. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23, 77–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gross K L, Pregitzer K S and Burton A J 1995 Spatial variation in nitrogen availability in three successional plant communities. J. Ecol. 83, 357–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hart S C, Stark J M, Davidson E A and Firestone M K 1994 Nitrogen mineralization, immobilization and nitrification. In Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2. Microbiological and Biochemical Properties. Ed. R W Weaver. pp 985–1018. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  16. Heilmann B and Beese F 1992 Miniaturized method to measure carbon dioxide production and biomass of soil microorganisms. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56, 596–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kluitenberg G J, Mahmoudjafari M, Havlin J L, Sisson J B and Schwab A P 1997 Spatial variability of nitrogen mineralization at the field scale. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 1214–1221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krige D G 1981 Lognormal-d Wijsian geostatistics for ore evaluation. South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy. Monograph Series Geostatistics 1, 1–51.Google Scholar
  19. Lamorey G and Jacobson E 1995 Estimation of Semivariogram parameters and evaluation of the effects of data sparsity. Mathematical Geology 27(3), 327–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laverack MS 1963 The Physiology of Earthworms. The MacMillan Co., New York.Google Scholar
  21. Lechowicz M J and Bell G 1991 The ecology and genetics of fitness in forest plants. II. Microspatial heterogeneity of the edaphic environment. J. Ecol. 79, 687–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Meredieu C, Arrouays D, Goulard M and Auclair D 1996 Short range soil variability and its effect on Red Oak growth (Quercus Rubra L.). Soil Science 61, 29–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Morris S J 1998 Distribution patterns and scale dependency of microbial abundance and processes in relation to soil chemistry and vegetation in hardwood forest soils. Dept. Plant Biology, Ohio State University, Columbus Ohio.Google Scholar
  24. Morris S J 1999 Spatial distribution of fungal and bacterial bioass in southern Ohio hardwood forest soils: fine scale variability and microscale patterns. Soil Biol. Biochem. 31, 1375–1386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Palmer MW1990 Spatial scale and patterns of species-environment relationships in hardwood forests of the North Carolina piedmont. Coenoses 5, 79–87.Google Scholar
  26. Parkin T B 1993 Spatial variability of microbial process in soil - A review. J. Environ. Qual. 22, 409–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Paul E A and Clark F E 1996 Soil Microbiology and Biochemistry. Academic Press, San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  28. Pol-van Dasselaar A, Corre W J, Prieme A, Klemedtsson A K, Weslien P, Stein A, Klemedtsson L and O. Oenema 1998 Spatial variability of methane, nitrous oxide, and carbon dioxide emissions from drained grasslands. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62, 810–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Robertson G P and Gross K L 1994 Assessing the heterogeneity of belowground resources: Quantifying pattern and scale. In Plant Exploitation of Environmental Heterogeneity. Eds M M Caldwell and R W Pearcy. pp 237–253. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson G P, Crum J R and Ellis B G 1993 The spatial variability of soil resources following long-term disturbance. Oecologia 96, 451–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Robertson G P, Huston M A, Evans F C and Tiedje J M 1988 Spatial variability in a successional plant community: patterns of nitrogen availability. Ecology 69, 1517–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Robertson G P, Klingensmith K M, Klug M J, Paul E A, Crum J R and Ellis B G 1997 Soil resources, microbial activity, and primary production across an agricultural ecosystem. Ecological Applications 7, 158–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rochette P, Desjardins R L and Pattey E 1991 Spatial and temporal variability of soil respiration in agricultural fields. Can. J. Soil Sci. 71, 189–196.Google Scholar
  34. Schlesinger W H, Raikes J A, Hartley A E and Cross A F 1996 On the spatial pattern of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Selles F, Campbell C A, McConkey B G, Bandt S A and Messer D 1999 Relationships between biological and chemical measures of N supplying power and total soil N at field scale. Can. J. Soil Sci. 79, 353–366.Google Scholar
  36. Thierron V and Laudelout H 1996 Contribution of root respiration to total CO2 efflux from the soil of a deciduous forest. Can. J. For. Res. 26, 1142–1148.Google Scholar
  37. Whiteside E, Schneider I and Cook R 1959 Soils of Michigan. East Lansing, MI, Michigan State University Agricultural Experiment Station.Google Scholar
  38. Willson T C 1998 Managing Nitrogen Mineralization and Biologically Active Organic Matter Fractions in Agricultural Soil Crop and Soil Sciences, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut Stoyan
  • Helvecio De-Polli
  • Sven Böhm
  • G. Philip Robertson
  • Eldor A. Paul

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations