Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 220, Issue 1–2, pp 189–205 | Cite as

Comparative response of wheat and oilseed rape to nitrogen supply: absorption and utilisation efficiency of radiation and nitrogen during the reproductive stages determining yield

  • M. F. Dreccer
  • A. H. C. M. Schapendonk
  • G. A. Slafer
  • R. Rabbinge
Article

Abstract

We investigated the response of spring wheat and oilseed rape to nitrogen (N) supply, focusing on the critical period for grain number definition and grain filling. Crops were grown in containers under a shelter and treated with five combinations of applied N. Wheat and oilseed rape produced comparable amounts of biomass and yield when corrected for the costs of biomass synthesis (SC). From the responses of biomass and yield to late N applications and the apparent contribution of mobilised biomass to yield, it seems that the yield of oilseed rape was more source-limited during grain filling than that of wheat, particularly at the medium and high N levels. Both species recovered equal amounts of N from the total available N in the soil and had similar N use efficiencies, expressed as yield per unit of N absorbed. However, oilseed rape had higher efficiency to convert absorbed N in biomass, but lower harvest index of N than wheat. Oilseed rape had similar or lower root biomass than wheat, depending on N level, but higher root length per unit soil volume and specific root length. The specific uptake rate of N per unit root dry weight during the critical period for grain number determination was higher in oilseed rape than in wheat. In wheat, N limitation affected growth through a similar or lower reduction in radiation use efficiency corrected for synthesis costs (RUESC) than in the cumulative amount of intercepted photosynthetically active radiation (IPARc). In oilseed rape, lower growth due to N shortage was associated more with RUESC than IPARc, during flowering while during grain filling both components contributed similarly to decreased growth. RUESC and the concentration of N in leaves and inflorescence (LIN%) decreased from flowering to maturity and were curvilinearly related. Oilseed rape tended to have higher RUESC than wheat at high N supply during the critical period for grain number determination, and generally lower during grain filling. The reasons for these differences and possibilities to increase yield potential are discussed in terms of the photosynthetic efficiency of the different organs and changes in source–sink ratio during reproductive stages.

biomass intercepted radiation nitrogen nutrition oilseed rape radiation use efficiency wheat 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abbate P, Andrade F H and Culot J P 1995 The effects of radiation and nitrogen on number of grains in wheat. J. Agric. Sci., Camb. 124, 351–360.Google Scholar
  2. Andersen M N, Heidman T and Plauborg F 1996 The effects of drought and nitrogen on light interception, growth and yield of winter oilseed rape. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. B Soil and Plant Sci. 46, 55–67.Google Scholar
  3. Angus J F, Van Herwaarden A F and Howe G N 1991 Productivity and break crop effects of winter-growing oilseeds. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 31, 669–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barraclough P B 1986 The growth and activity of winter wheat roots in the field: nutrient uptakes of high-yielding crops. J. Agric.Sci., Camb. 106, 45–52.Google Scholar
  5. Barraclough P B 1989 Root growth, macro-nutrient uptake dynamics and soil fertility requirements of a high-yielding winter oilseed rape crop. Plant Soil 119, 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bell M A, Fischer R A, Byerlee D and Sayre K 1995 Genetic and agronomic contributions to yield gains: a case study for wheat. Field Crops Res. 44, 55–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bennie A T P 1991 Growth and mechanical impedance. In Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. Eds Y Waisel, A Eshel and U Kafkafi. pp 393–414. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  8. Bilsborrow P E, Evans E J and Zhao F J 1993 The influence of spring nitrogen on yield, yield components and glucosinolate content of autumn-sown oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. 120, 219–224.Google Scholar
  9. Charles-Edwards D A 1982 Physiological determinants of crop growth. Academic Press, North Ryde, North South Wales, Australia 161 p.Google Scholar
  10. Colnenne C, Meynard J M, Reau R, Justes E J and Merrien A 1998 Determination of a critical nitrogen dilution curve for winter oilseed rape. Ann. Bot. 81, 311–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. FAO 1997 Production Yearbook vol. 50 1996. FAO Statistics series no. 135. Food and Agricultutal Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 235 p.Google Scholar
  12. Fischer R A 1985 Number of kernels in wheat crops and the influence of solar radiation and temperature. J. Agric. Sci. 105, 447–461.Google Scholar
  13. Fischer R A, Howe G N and Ibrahim Z 1993 Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertiliser. I Grain yield and protein content. Field Crops Res. 33, 37–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer R A 1993 Irrigated spring wheat and timing and amount of nitrogen fertiliser. II. Physiology of grain yield response. Field Crops Res. 33, 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flénet F and Kiniry J R 1995 Efficiency of biomass accumulation by sunflower as affected by glucose requirement of biosynthesis and leaf nitrogen content. Field Crops Res. 44, 119–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gammelvind L H, Schjoerring J K, Mogensen V O, Jensen C R and Bock J H G 1996 Photosynthesis in leaves and siliques of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Plant Soil 186, 227–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Genstat 5 Committee 1987 Genstat 5 Reference Manual. Clarendon Press, Oxford 300 p.Google Scholar
  18. Gooding M J and Davies W P 1997 Wheat production and utilization. Systems, quality and the environment. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK. 355 p.Google Scholar
  19. Goudriaan J and Van Laar H H 1994 Modelling potential crop growth processes. Textbook with exercises. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. 238 p.Google Scholar
  20. Green C F 1987 Nitrogen nutrition and wheat in growth in relation to absorbed solar radiation. Agric. For. Met. 41, 207–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gregory P J and Eastham J 1996 Growth of shoots and roots, and interception of radiation by wheat and lupin crops on a shallow, duplex soil in response to time of sowing. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 47, 427–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habekotté B 1993 Quantitative analysis of pod formation, seed set and seed filling in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) under field conditions.Field Crops Res. 35, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Habekotté B 1997a Identification of strong and weak yield determining components of winter oilseed rape compared with winter wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 7, 315–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Habekotté B 1997b Options for increasing seed yield of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.): a simulation study. Field Crops Res 54, 109–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammer G L and Wright G C 1994. A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 45, 575–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hocking P J and Mason L 1993 Accumulation, distribution and redistribution of dry matter and mineral nutrients in fruits of canola (oilseed rape), and the effects of nitrogen fertiliser and windrowing. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 44, 1377–1388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hocking P J, Kirkegaard J A, Angus J F, Gibson A H and Koetz E A 1997a Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. I. Effects of nitrogen fertiliser on dry-matter production, seed yield and seed quality. Field Crops Res. 49, 107–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hocking P J, Randall P J and DeMarco D 1997b The response of dryland canola to nitrogen fertilizer: partitioning and mobilization of dry matter and nitrogen, and nitrogen effects on yield components. Field Crops Res. 49, 201–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Huggins D R and Pan W L 1993 Nitrogen efficiency component analysis: an evaluation of cropping system differences in productivity. Crop Sci. 85, 898–905.Google Scholar
  30. Kirkegaard J A, Hocking P J, Angus J F, Howe G N and Gardner P A 1997 Comparison of canola, Indian mustard and Linola in two contrasting environments. II. Break-crop and nitrogen effects on subsequent wheat crops. Field Crops Res. 52, 179–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Mendham N J, Shipway P A and Scott R K 1981 The effects of seed size, autumn nitrogen and plant population on the response to delayed sowing in winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 96, 417–428.Google Scholar
  32. Merlo L, Ferretti M, Passera C and Ghisi R 1995 Light-modulation of nitrate reductase activity in leaves and roots of maize. Physiol. Plantarum 94, 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pechan P A and Morgan D G 1985 Defoliation and its effects on pod and seed development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J. Exp. Bot. 36, 458–468.Google Scholar
  34. Penning de Vries F W T, Van Laar H H and Chardon M C M 1983 Bioenergetics of growth of seed, fruits and storage organs. In Potential Productivity of Field Crops Under Different Environments. Eds WH Smith and SJ Banta. pp 37–60. International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños.Google Scholar
  35. Radin J W 1983 Control of plant growth by nitrogen: differences between cereals and broadleaf species. Plant Cell Environ. 6, 65–68.Google Scholar
  36. Rood S B, Major D J and Charnetski WA 1984 Seasonal changes in 14CO2 assimilation and 14C translocation in oilseed rape. Field Crops Res. 8, 341–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Schenk M K 1996 Regulation of nitrogen uptake on the whole plant level. Plant Soil 181, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Schjoerring J K, Bock J G H, Gammelvind L, Jensen C R and Mogensen V O 1995. Nitrogen incorporation and remobilization in different shoot components of field-grown winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) as affected by rate of nitrogen application and irrigation. Plant Soil 177, 255–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sinclair T R and Horie T 1989 Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Sci. 29, 90–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Sinclair T R and Muchow R 1999 Radiation use efficiency. Advances in Agronomy 65, 215–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Slafer G A, Satorre E H and Andrade F H 1994 Increases in grain yield in bread wheat from breeding and associated physiological changes. In Genetic Improvement of Field Crops. Ed. GA Slafer. pp 1–68. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.Google Scholar
  42. Slafer G A and Savin R 1994 Source-sink relationships and grain mass at different positions within the spike in wheat. Field Crops Res. 37, 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith C J, Whitfield D M, Gyles O A and Wright G C 1989 Nitrogen fertiliser balance of irrigated wheat grown on a red brown earth in southeastern Australia. Field Crops Res. 21, 265–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith C J and Whitfield D M 1990 Nitrogen accumulation and redistribution of late applications of 15N-labelled fertiliser by wheat. Field Crops Res. 24, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spiertz J H J and de Vos N M 1983 Agronomical and physiological aspects of the role of nitrogen in yield formation of cereals. Plant Soil 75, 379–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Stapper M and Fischer R A 1990 Genotype, sowing date and planting spacing influence on high yielding irrigated wheat in southern New south Wales. II Growth, yield and nitrogen use. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41, 1021–1041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sylvester-Bradley R and Makepeace R J 1984 A code for stages of development in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). Asp. Appl. Biol. 6, 399–419.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor A J, Smith C J and Wilson I B 1991 Effect of irrigation and fertiliser on yield, oil content, nitrogen accumulation and water use of canola (Brassica napus L.). Fert. Res. 29, 249–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Tayo T O and Morgan D G. 1979. Quantitative analysis of the growth, development and distribution of flowers and pods in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 85, 103–110.Google Scholar
  50. Tennant D 1976 A test of a modified line intersect method of estimating root length. J. Ecol. 63, 995–1001.Google Scholar
  51. Thorne G N, Pearman I, Day W and Todd A D 1988 Estimation of radiation interception by winter wheat from measurements of leaf area. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 110, 101–108.Google Scholar
  52. Uppström B 1995 Seed chemistry In Brassica Oilseeds. Production and Utilization. Eds D Kimber and DI McGregor. pp 217–264. CAB International, Wallingford.Google Scholar
  53. Van Arendonk J J C M, Niemann G J, Boon J J and Lambers H 1997 Effects of nitrogen supply on the anatomy and chemical composition of leaves of four grass species belonging to the genus Poa, as determined by image-processing analysis and pyrolisis-mass spectrometry. Plant Cell Environ. 20, 881–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Vos J and Van der Putten P E L 1998 effect of nitrogen on leaf growth, leaf nitrogen economy and photosynthetic capacity. Field Crops Res. 59, 63–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wright G C, Smith C J and Woodroofe M R 1988 The effect of irrigation and nitrogen fertiliser on rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) production in southern-Australia I. Growth and seed yield. Irrig. Sci. 9, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yates D J and Steven M D 1987 Reflexion and absorption of solar radiaiton by flowering canopies of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L). J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 109, 495–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zadoks J C, Chang T T and Konzak C F 1974 A decimal code for the growth of cereals. Weed Res. 14, 415–421.Google Scholar
  58. Zhang Q Z, Kullmann A and Geisler G 1991 Nitrogen transportation in oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) plant during flowering and early siliqua developing. J. Agronomy Crop Sci. 167, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Zentner R P, Brandt S A and Campbell C A 1996 Economics of monoculture cereal and mixed oilseed-cereal rotations in westcentral Saskatchewan. Can. J. Plant Sci. 76, 393–400.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. F. Dreccer
  • A. H. C. M. Schapendonk
  • G. A. Slafer
  • R. Rabbinge

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations