Plant and Soil

, Volume 223, Issue 1–2, pp 47–61

Soil patchiness in juniper-sagebrush-grass communities of central Oregon

  • Christine Roberts
  • Julia Allen Jones
Article

Abstract

This study compared the sizes, spacings and properties (soil moisture, pH, nitrogen, soil arthropods and VAM) of soil resource islands and bare patches in sagebrush-grass communities invaded by western juniper versus those without juniper. We analyzed 1000 surface soil samples taken from nine 50-m radius circular plots sampled in December of 1991 and May of 1992 on ‘The Island’, one of the few undisturbed areas of sagebrush-grass shrubland in Oregon. Spatial structure was interpreted from correlograms (Moran's I) and standardized semivariograms. The presence of juniper was associated with increased bare area and smaller, more widely spaced grass and sagebrush plants. Soil arthropod numbers and biomass in plots with juniper were only roughly one-fifth of those in sagebrush-grass plots in December. The dominant soil pattern in both sagebrush-grass and juniper-sagebrush-grass plots was regularly-distributed patches spanning a range of sizes and spacings. Plots with juniper had greater patchiness at shorter lags (<3 m), and patchiness was more developed for soil moisture, net nitrification, and net N mineralization, whereas sagebrush-grass plots had greater patchiness at longer lags (3 – 9 m) and patchiness was more developed for NO3–N, arthropod numbers and biomass. These differences in soil patterns with and without juniper indicate that juniper responds to, or causes, changes in the size of resource islands under sage and grass when it invades sage-grass communities.

correlograms nitrogen soil arthropods soil resource islands variograms vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Anderson J M and Ingram J S I 1989 Tropical soil biology and fertility: A handbook of methods. CAB International, Rothamstead.Google Scholar
  2. Bartlett R. and James B 1980 Studying dried, stored soil samples - some pitfalls. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 721–724.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belsky A J, Mwonga S M, Amundson R G, Duxbury J M and Ali A R 1993 Comparative effects of isolated trees on their undercanopy environments in high-and low-rainfall savannas. J. Appl. Ecol. 30, 143–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belsky A J 1996 Viewpoint: Western juniper expansion: Is it a threat to arid northwestern ecosystems? J. Range Manag. 49, 53–59.Google Scholar
  5. Bergelson J, Newman J A and Floresroux E M 1993 Rates of weed spread in spatially heterogeneous environments. Ecology 74, 999–1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burgess T M and Webster R 1980 Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties. 1. The semivariogram and punctual kriging. J. Soil Sci. 31, 315–331.Google Scholar
  7. Burrough P A 1983 Multiscale sources of spatial variation in soil. II. A non-Brownian fractal model and its application in soil survey. J. Soil Sci. 34, 599–620.Google Scholar
  8. Charley J L and West N E 1975 Plant-induced soil chemical patterns in some shrub-dominated semi-desert ecosystems of Utah. J. Ecol. 63, 945–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen W B, Spies T A and Bradshaw G A 1990 Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Rem. Sens. Envir. 34, 167–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cressie N 1993 Statistics for spatial data. Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
  11. Driscoll R S 1964 A relict area in the Central Oregon juniper zone. Ecology 45, 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Eddleman L E 1987 Establishment of western juniper in central Oregon. In Proceedings - pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16. Reno, NV. Ed. RL Everett. pp 255–259. General Technical Report INT-815. US. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden UT.Google Scholar
  13. EPA-600/4-79-020 1984 Methods for chemical analysis of water and wastes, Nitrogen, ammonia Method 350.1 (Colorimetric, Automated Phenate.) and Nitrogen, Nitrate-Nitrite, Method 353.2 (Colorimetric Automate, Cadmium Reduction).Google Scholar
  14. Errington J G 1973 The effect of regular and random distribution on the analysis of pattern. J. Ecol. 61, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Flanagan L B, Ehleringer J R and Marshall J D 1992 Differential uptake of summer precipitation among co-occurring trees and shrubs in a pinyon-juniper woodland. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 831–836.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freckman D W, Cromack K and Wallwork J A 1986 Recent advances in quantitative soil biology. In Developments of Biogeochemistry: Microfaunal and Faunal Interaction in Natural and Agro-ecosystems. Eds. MJ Mitchell and JP Nakas. pp 400–416. Nijhoff/Junk, The Hague.Google Scholar
  17. Giovannetti M and Mosse B 1979 An evaluation of techniques for measuring vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in roots. New Phytol. 84, 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halvorson J J, Bolton H Jr, Smith J L and Rossi R E 1994 Measuring resource islands using geostatistics. Great Basins Nat. 54, 313–328.Google Scholar
  19. Halvorson J J, Smith J L, Bolton H Jr and Rossi R E 1995 Evaluating shrub-associated spatial patterns of soil properties in a shrubsteppe ecosystem using multiple-variable geostatistics. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 59, 1476–1487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Halvorson J J, Bolton H Jr and Smith J L 1997 The pattern of soil variables related to Artemisia tridentata in a burned shrub-steppe site. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 61, 287–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hook P B, Burke I C and Lauenroth W K 1991 Heterogeneity of soil and plant N and C associated with individuals plants and openings in North American shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 138, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hook P B, Lauenroth W K and Burke I C 1994 Spatial patterns of roots in a semiarid grassland: Abundance of canopy openings and regeneration gaps. J Ecol 82, 485–494.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ingham R E, Trofymow J A, Ingham E R, Ames R N, Hunt H W, Morlay C R, Moore J C and Colman D C 1986 Trophic interactions and nitrogen cycling in a semi-arid grassland soil. II. System responses to removal of different groups of soil microbes or fauna.J. Appl. Ecol. 23, 615–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson R B and Caldwell M M 1993a The scale of nutrient heterogeneity around individual plants and its quantification with geostatistics. Ecology 74, 612–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jackson R B and Caldwell M M 1993b Geostatistical patterns of soil heterogeneity around individual perennial plants. J. Ecol. 81, 683–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keeney D R and Nelson D W 1982 Nitrogen-inorganic forms. In Methods of soil analysis, part 2. Eds. AL Page, RH Miller and DR Keeney. Agron. Monogr. 9, Am. Soc. Agron., Madison, Wisconsin.Google Scholar
  27. Knapp P A and P T Soule 1996 Vegetation change and the role of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on a relict site in central Oregon: 1960-1994. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 86, 387–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kramer S, Miller P M and Eddleman L E 1996 Root system morphology and development of seedling and juvenile Juniperus occidentalis. Forest Ecol. Manag. 86, 229–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Legendre P and Fortin M J 1989 Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80, 107–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leighty WJ 1958 Soil Survey, Deschutes area, Oregon. (Correlation by A.E. Kocher and J. W. Leighty.) Soil Survey, ser. 1945, no 2. U.S. Govt. Print Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
  31. Levin S A 1992 The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 63(6), 1943–1967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Merchant V A and D A Crossley 1970 An inexpensive, high efficiency Tullgren extractor for soil microarthropods. Georgia Entomol. Soc. J. 5, 83–87.Google Scholar
  33. Miller R F, Angell R F and Eddleman L E 1987 Water use by western juniper. In Proceedings - pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16. Reno, NV. Eds. RL Everett. pp 418–422. General Technical Report INT-815. US Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.Google Scholar
  34. Neter J, Wasserman W and Kutner M H 1990 Applied linear statistical models: regression, analysis of variance and experimental designs. Irwin, Homewood, IL.Google Scholar
  35. Padien D J and Lajtha K 1992 Plant spatial pattern and nutrient distribution in pinyon-juniper woodlands along an elevational gradient in northern New Mexico. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163, 425–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Phillips J M and Hayman D S 1970 Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc. 55, 158–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Polis G A, Anderson WB and Holt R D 1997 Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: The dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28, 289–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rabatin S C and Stinner B R 1985 Arthropods as consumers of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Mycologia 77, 320–322.Google Scholar
  39. Roberts C 1994 Spatial relationships of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae, soil fauna and soil nutrients in the juniper-sagebrushgrass communities of central Oregon. MS thesis, Department of Forest Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. Rossi R E, Mulla R J, Journel A G and Franz E H 1992 Geostatistical tools for modeling and interpreting ecological spatial dependence. Ecol. Monog. 62, 277–314.Google Scholar
  40. Ryel R J, Caldwell MM and Manwaring J H 1996 Temporal dynamics of soil spatial heterogeneity in sagebrush-wheatgrass steppe during a growing season. Plant Soil 184, 299–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Santos P F, Phillips J and Whitford W G 1981 The role of mites and nematodes in early stages of buried litter decomposition in a desert. Ecology 62, 664–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schlesinger W H, Reynolds J F, Cunningham G L, Huenneke L F, Jarrell W M, Virginia R A and Whitford W G 1990. Biological feedbacks in global desertification. Science 247, 1043–1048.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Schlesinger W H, Raikes J A, Hartley A E and Cross A F 1996 On the spatial patterns of soil nutrients in desert ecosystems. Ecology 77, 364–374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Smith J L, Halvorson J J and Bolton H Jr 1994 Spatial relationships of soil microbial biomass and C and N mineralization in a semi-arid shrub-steppe ecosystem. Soil Biol. Biochem. 26, 1151–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sokal R R and Oden N L 1978 Spatial autocorrelation in biology. 1. Methodology. Biol. J. Linnean Soc. 10, 199–228.Google Scholar
  46. Stanford G, Carter J N and Smith S J 1974. Estimates of potentially mineralizable soil nitrogen based on short-term incubations. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 38, 99–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stanford G and Smith S J 1972 Nitrogen mineralization potential of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. Proc. 36, 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Steel R G D and Torrie J 1980 Principles and procedures of statistics, a biometrical approach. 2nd Edn. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
  49. Torgerson C, Jones J A, Moldenke A and LeMaster M P 1995 The spatial heterogeneity of soil invertebrates and edaphic properties in an old growth forest stand in western Oregon. In The Significance and Regulation of Soil Biodiversity. Eds. HP Collins, GP Robertson and MJ King. pp 225–236. Kluwer Publications, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  50. Trappe J A 1981 Mycorrhizae and productivity of arid and semiarid rangelands. In Advances in Food Producing Systems for Arid and Semiarid Lands. pp 581–599. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
  51. Turner M G 1989 Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20, 171–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wallwork J A 1976 The distribution and diversity of soil fauna. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
  53. Whitford W G 1986 Soil fauna as regulators of decomposition and nitrogen cycling in pinyon-juniper ecosystems. In Proceedings - pinyon-juniper conference; 1986 January 13-16 Reno, NV. Ed. RL Everett. General Technical Report INT-815. U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Research Station, Ogden, UT.Google Scholar
  54. Wilkinson L, Blank G and Gruber C 1996 Desktop data analysis with SYSTAT. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Roberts
    • 1
  • Julia Allen Jones
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Forest ScienceOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeosciencesOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations