Allied Sciences and Fundamental Problems:C.C. Adams and the Search for Method in Early AmericanEcology

  • Juan Ilerbaig


Historians of American ecology see early ecologists' advocacy of the experimental method as an example that illustrates how turn-of-the-century American biology favored manipulative methods of study. Historians have begun to show how the belief in the superiority of interventionist methods was only one of the reasons behind this trend, in addition to pragmatism and the need for legitimizaton. This paper contributes to the examination of such methodological issues in ecology through a study of the early career of Charles Christopher Adams (1873–1955). Unlike contemporary ecologists such as Frederic Clements or Victor Shelford, Adams encouraged fellow ecologists to adopt descriptive methodologies based on taxonomy. To understand this seemingly paradoxical case, this paper argues for a broadening of the historiography of turn-of-the-century biology, paying increased attention to neighboring disciplines, non-academic institutions, and a wider range of philosophical commitments. In particular, the paper argues that Adams's commitment to the significance of history and the changes in his institutional affiliations shaped his early ecological work, his views on ecological method, and his conception of ecology as a science. For Adams, ecology shared with such other natural historical sciences as anthropology and geology a commitment to the historicity of evolutionary processes. Thus, he took these “allied sciences” as models for ecology early in his career, encouraging other naturalists to adopt the historical perspective of these disciplines. However, as Adams's institutional affiliation changed from museum to university, his commitment to history was overshadowed by the use of a more inclusive rhetoric of unification. He searched for concepts that could accommodate both evolutionary and physiological explanations in an attempt to counter the forces of divergence within biology.

C.C. Adams history of ecology animal ecology biogeography natural historical sciences method in ecology 


  1. Adams, Charles Christopher. 1900. “Variation in Io. ” Proc. Amer. Ass. Ad. Sci. 49: 208–225.Google Scholar
  2. —— 1901. “Baseleveling and Its Faunal Significance, with Illustrations from Southeastern United States. ” Amer. Nat. 35: 839–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. —— 1902a. “Southeastern United States as a Center of Geographical Distribution of Flora and Fauna. ” Biol. Bull. 3: 115–131.Google Scholar
  4. —— 1902b. “Postglacial Origin and Migrations of the Life of the Northeastern United States. ” Journal of Geography 1: 303–310, 352–357.Google Scholar
  5. —— 1905. “The Postglacial Dispersal of the North American Biota. ” Biol. Bull. 9: 53–71.Google Scholar
  6. —— 1906. “Introductory Note. ” In State Board of Geological Survey [of Michigan] Report for 1905: An Ecological Survey in Northern Michigan, prepared under the direction of Chas. C. Adams, pp. 9–12. Lansing: Wynkoop Hallenbeck Crawford.Google Scholar
  7. —— 1908. “The Ecological Succession of Birds. ” Auk 25: 109–153.Google Scholar
  8. —— 1913. Guide to the Study of Animal Ecology. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  9. —— 1915a. “The Variations and Ecological Distribution of the Snails of the Genus Io. ” Mem. Nat. Acad. Sci. 12(2): 1–184.Google Scholar
  10. —— 1915b. “An Outline of the Relations of Animals to their Inland Environments. ” Bulletin of the Illinois State Laboratory of Natural History 11: 1–32.Google Scholar
  11. —— 1917. “The New Natural History–Ecology. ” Amer. Mus. J. 17: 491–494.Google Scholar
  12. —— 1918–19. “Migration as a Factor in Evolution: Its Ecological Dynamics. ” Amer. Nat. 52: 465–490; 53: 55–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. —— 1919. “The Roosevelt Wild Life Forest Experiment Station. ” Science 49: 533–534.Google Scholar
  14. Allen, Garland E. [1975] 1978a. Life Science in the Twentieth Century, revised edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. —— 1978b. Thomas Hunt Morgan: TheMan and His Science. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  16. —— 1979. “Naturalists and Experimentalists: The Genotype and the Phenotype. ” Stud. Hist. Biol. 3: 179–209.Google Scholar
  17. Allen, Joel A. 1877. “The Influence of Physical Conditions in the Genesis of Species. ” Radical Review 1: 108–140. Reprinted in Smithsonian Inst. Rep. for 1905, pp. 375–407. Washington, D.C., 1906.Google Scholar
  18. Amundson, Ron. 1994. “John T. Gulick and the Active Organism: Adaptation, Isolation, and the Politics of Evolution. ” In Darwin's Laboratory: Evolutionary Theory and Natural History in the Pacific, ed. Roy MacLeod and Philip Rehbock, pp. 110–139. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
  19. Anonymous. 1908. “Organization and Minutes of the First Meeting of American Association of Museums. ” Proc. Amer. Ass. Mus. 1.Google Scholar
  20. Appel, Toby A. 1988. “Organizing Biology: The American Society of Naturalists and its ‘Affiliated Societies,’ 1883–1923. ” In Rainger, Benson, and Maienschein, pp. 87–120.Google Scholar
  21. Barrow, Mark V. 1998. A Passion for Birds: American Ornithology after Audubon. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  22. Benson, Keith R. 1992. “Experimental Ecology on the Pacific Coast: Victor Shelford and His Search for Appropriate Methods. ” Hist. Phil. Life Sci. 14: 73–91.Google Scholar
  23. Boas, Franz. 1887a. “The Study of Geography. ” Science 9: 137–141.Google Scholar
  24. —— 1887b. “The Occurrence of Similar Inventions in Areas Widely Apart. ” Science 9: 485–486.Google Scholar
  25. —— 1887c. “Museums of Ethnology and Their Classification. ” Science 9: 587–589.Google Scholar
  26. —— 1896. “The Limitations of the Comparative Method of Anthropology. ” Science 4: 901–908.Google Scholar
  27. Bocking, Stephen. 1990. “Stephen Forbes, Jacob Reighard, and the Emergence of Aquatic Ecology in the Great Lakes Region. ” J. Hist. Biol. 23: 461–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bowers, Janice Emily. 1988. A Sense of Place: The Life and Work of Forrest Shreve. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  29. Bowler, Peter J. 1993. The Norton History of the Environmental Sciences. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  30. Bunzl, Matti. 1996. “Franz Boas and the Humboldtian Tradition: From Volkgeist and Nationalcharakter to an Anthropological Concept of Culture. ” In Volkgeist as Method and Ethic: Essays on Boasian Ethnography and the German Anthropological Tradition, ed. George W. Stocking, Jr., pp. 17–78. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Cain, Joseph Allen. 1992. “Building a Temporal Biology: Simpson's Program for Paleontology during an American Expansion of Biology. ” Earth Sciences History 11: 30–36.Google Scholar
  32. Chamberlin, Thomas Chrowder. 1897. “The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses. ” J. Geol. 5: 837–848.Google Scholar
  33. Chorley, Richard J., Beckinsale, Robert P. and Dunn, Anthony J. 1973. The History of the Study of Landforms, or the Development of Geomorphology. Volume Two. The Life and Work of William Morris Davis. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
  34. Cittadino, Eugene. 1980. “Ecology and the Professionalization of Botany in America, 1890–1905. ” Stud. Hist. Biol. 4: 171–198.Google Scholar
  35. Cittadino, Eugene. 1990. Nature as the Laboratory: Darwinian Plant Ecology in the German Empire, 1880–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Croker, Robert A. Pioneer Ecologist: The Life and Work of Victor Ernest Shelford, 1877–1968. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  37. Farber, Paul. 1982. The Emergence of Ornithology as a Scientific Discipline: 1760–1850. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
  38. Forbes, Stephen A. 1909. “The General Entomological Ecology of the Indian Corn Plant. ” Amer. Nat. 43: 286–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Geison, Gerald L. (ed.). 1987. Physiology in the American Context, 1850–1940. Bethesda: American Physiological Society.Google Scholar
  40. Gilbert, Grove Karl. 1886. “The Inculcation of the Scientific Method by Example. ” Amer. J. Sci. 31: 284–299.Google Scholar
  41. Gill, Ayesha E. and Wozencraft, W. Chris. 1994. “Committees and Annual Meetings. ” In Seventy Five Years of Mammalogy (1919–1994), ed. Elmer C. Birney and Jerry R. Choate, pp. 155–170. The American Society of Mammalogists, Special Publication No. 11.Google Scholar
  42. Gould, Steven Jay. 1986. “Evolution and the Triumph of Homology, orWhy History Matters. ” Amer. Sci. 74: 60–69.Google Scholar
  43. Gulick, Addison. 1932. John Thomas Gulick: Evolutionist and Missionary. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Gulick, John T. 1905. Evolution, Racial and Habitudinal. Washington, D.C.: Carnegie Institution of Washington.Google Scholar
  45. Hagen, Joel B. 1986. “Ecologists and Taxonomists: Divergent Traditions in Twentieth Century Plant Geography. ” J. Hist. Biol. 19: 197–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. —— 1988. “Organism and Environment: Frederic Clements's Vision of a Unified Physiological Ecology. ” In Rainger, Benson and Maienschein, pp. 257–280.Google Scholar
  47. —— 1992. An Entangled Bank: The Origins of Ecosystem Ecology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Hayes, C.W. and Campbell, M. R. 1900. “The Relation of Biology to Physiography. ” Science 12: 131–133.Google Scholar
  49. Howard, Leland Ossian. 1932. “Biographical Memoir of Stephen Alfred Forbes, 1844–1930. ” National Academy of Sciences Biographic Memoirs 15 (First Memoir).Google Scholar
  50. James, Preston E. and Martin, Geoffrey J. 1978. The Association of American Geographers: The First Seventy-Five Years. Association of American Geographers.Google Scholar
  51. Johnson, Douglas Wilson. 1905. “The Distribution of Fresh-Water Faunas as an Evidence of Drainage Modifications. ” Science 21: 588–592.Google Scholar
  52. Jordan, David Starr. 1905. “The Origin of Species through Isolation. ” Science 22: 545–562.Google Scholar
  53. Keyes, Charles R. 1898. “The Genetic Classification of Geological Phenomena. ” J. Geol. 6: 809–815.Google Scholar
  54. Kingsland, Sharon E. 1985. Modeling Nature: Episodes in the History of Population Ecology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  55. —— 1990. “The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900–1912. ” Isis 82: 479–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. —— 1991. “Defining Ecology as a Science. ” In Foundations of Ecology: Classic Papers with Commentaries, ed. Leslie A. Real and James H. Brown, pp. 1–13. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  57. —— 1992. “An Elusive Science: Ecological Enterprise in the Southwestern United States. ” In Science and Nature: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences, ed. Michael Shortland, pp. 151–179. Oxford: British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
  58. Kohler, Robert E. 1994. Lords of the Fly: Drosophila Genetics and the Experimental Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  59. Kohlstedt, Sally Gregory. 1987. “International Exchange and National Style: A View of Natural History Museums in the United States, 1850–1900. ” In Scientific Colonialism: A Cross-Cultural Comparison, ed. Nathan Reingold and Marc Rothenberg, pp. 167–190. Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press.Google Scholar
  60. —— 1988. “Museums on Campus: A Tradition of Inquiry and Teaching. ” In Rainger, Benson, and Maienschein, pp. 15–47.Google Scholar
  61. Lesch, John E. 1975. “The Role of Isolation in Evolution: George J. Romanes and John T. Gulick. ” Isis 66: 483–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Lovely, Robert Allyn. 1995. Mastering Nature's Harmony: Stephen Forbes and the Roots of American Ecology. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Wisconsin-Madison.Google Scholar
  63. McGee, W J. 1888. “The Classification of Geographic Forms by Genesis. ” National Geographic Magazine 1: 27–36.Google Scholar
  64. McIntosh, Robert. 1985. The Background of Ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Magnus, David. 1993. In Defense of Natural History: David Starr Jordan and the Role of Isolation in Evolution. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stanford University.Google Scholar
  66. —— 1997. “Heuristics and Biases in Evolutionary Biology. ” Biol. Phil. 12: 21–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Maienschein, Jane. 1991. Transforming Traditions in American Biology, 1880–1915. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  68. —— 1994. “Pattern and Process in Early Studies of Arizona's San Francisco Peaks. ” BioScience 44: 479–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Merriam, C. Hart. 1894. “Laws of Temperature Control of the Geographic Distribution of Terrestrial Animals and Plants. ” National Geographic Magazine 6: 229–238.Google Scholar
  70. —— 1906. “Is Mutation a Factor in the Evolution of the Higher Vertebrates?” Science 23: 241–257.Google Scholar
  71. Mitman, Gregg. 1992. The State of Nature: Ecology, Community, and American Social Thought, 1900–1950. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Nyhart, Lynn K. 1996. “Natural History and the ‘New’ Biology. ” In Cultures of Natural History, ed. N. Jardine, J. A. Secord and E. C. Spary, pp. 426–443. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Overfield, Richard A. 1993. Science with Practice: Charles E. Bessey and the Maturing of American Botany. Ames: Iowa State University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Pattison, William D. 1981. “Rollin Salisbury and the Establishment of Geography at the University of Chicago. ” In The Origins of Academic Geography in the United States, ed. Brian W. Blouet, pp. 151–163. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books.Google Scholar
  75. Pauly, Philip. 1987. Controlling Life: Jacques Loeb and the Engineering Ideal in Biology. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Pyne, Stephen J. 1978. “Methodologies for Geology: G.K. Gilbert and T.C. Chamberlin. ” Isis 69: 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Rainger, Ronald. 1991. An Agenda for Antiquity: Henry Fairfield Osborn and Vertebrate Paleontology at the American Museum of Natural History, 1890–1935. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  78. Rainger, Ronald, Benson, Keith R. and Maienschein, Jane (eds.). 1988. The American Development of Biology. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  79. Rudwick, Martin J. S. 1977. “Historical Analogies in the Geological Work of Charles Lyell. ” Janus 64: 89–107.Google Scholar
  80. —— 1979. “Transposed Concepts from the Human Sciences in the Early Work of Charles Lyell. ” In Images of the Earth: Essays in the History of the Environmental Sciences, ed. L.J. Jordanova and Roy S. Porter, pp. 67–83. The British Society for the History of Science.Google Scholar
  81. Ruthven, Alexander G. 1906. “An Ecological Survey in the Porcupine Mountains and Isle Royale, Michigan. ” In State Board of Geological Survey [of Michigan] Report for 1905: An Ecological Survey in Northern Michigan, Prepared under the Direction of Chas. C. Adams, pp. 17–55. Lansing: Wynkoop Hallenbeck Crawford.Google Scholar
  82. Shelford, Victor E. 1911. “Physiological Animal Geography. ” J. Morph. 22: 551–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. —— 1911–12. “Ecological Succession. ” Biol. Bull. 21: 9–34, 127–151; 22: 1–38; 23: 59–99, 331–370.Google Scholar
  84. —— 1913. Animal Communities in Temperate America as Illustrated in the Chicago Region: A Study in Animal Ecology. The Geographic Society of Chicago, Bulletin no. 5. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  85. —— 1914. “A Comparison of the Responses of Sessile and Motile Plants and Animals. ” Amer. Nat. 48: 641–674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Smocovitis, Vassiliki Betty. 1996. Unifying Biology: The Evolutionary Synthesis and Evolutionary Biology. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  87. Star, Susan Leigh and Griesemer, James R. 1989. “Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professional in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–1939. ” Soc. Stud. Sci. 19: 387–420.Google Scholar
  88. Sterling, Keir B. 1974. Last of the Naturalists: The Career of C. Hart Merriam. New York: Arno Press.Google Scholar
  89. Stocking, George W., Jr. 1968. Race, Culture, and Evolution: Essays in the History of Anthropology. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  90. —— 1974. The Shaping of American Anthropology 1883–1911: A Franz Boas Reader. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  91. Tobey, Ronald. 1981. Saving the Prairies: The Life Cycle of the Founding School of American Plant Ecology, 1895–1955. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  92. Van Hise, Charles R. 1902. “The Training and Work of a Geologist. ” Science 16: 321–334.Google Scholar
  93. —— 1904. “The Problems of Geology. ” J. Geol. 12: 589–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Winsor, Mary P. 1991. Reading the Shape of Nature: Comparative Zoology at the Agassiz Museum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  95. Woodworth, J. B. 1894. “The Relation between Baseleveling and Organic Evolution. ” Amer. Geol. 14: 209–235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Juan Ilerbaig
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MinnesotaTate Laboratory of PhysicsMinneapolisU.S.A.E-mail:

Personalised recommendations