Policy Sciences

, Volume 33, Issue 1, pp 1–30 | Cite as

Policy networks and firm behaviours: Governance systems and firm reponses to external demands for sustainable forest management

  • Benjamin Cashore
  • Ilan Vertinsky
Article

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alabama Forestry Commission (1993). Alabama's Best Management Practices for Forestry. Montgomery, AL: Alabama Forestry Commission in cooperation with the Alabama Department of Environmental Management and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency with Clean Water Act, Section 319 demonstration funds.Google Scholar
  2. Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries (1998). Business Plan 1998. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries.Google Scholar
  3. American Forest and Paper Association (1993). Summary of comments on the Principles and Criteria of the Forest Stewardship Council. Washington, D.C.: AFPA.Google Scholar
  4. Atkinson, M. M. and W. D. Coleman (1989). The State, Business, and Industrial Change in Canada. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bernstein, S. and B. Cashore (Forthcoming). 'Globalization and fourth paths of internationalization: The case of eco-forestry policy change in British Columbia,' Canadian Journal of Political Science.Google Scholar
  6. Bernstein, S. and B. Cashore (Forthcoming). 'The international-domestic nexus: The effects of international trade and environmental politics on the Canadian forest sector,' in M. Howlett, ed., Canadian Forest Policy: Regimes, Policy Dynamics and Institutional Adaptations. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bliss, J. C., G. R. Howze, L. Teeter and C. Bailey (1993). 'Forestry and poverty in Alabama's black belt,' in Southern Forest Economics Workshop Annual Meeting. Durham, NC.Google Scholar
  8. Bonnett, M. and K. Zimmerman (1991). 'Politics and preservation: The endangered species act and the northern spotted owl,' Ecology Law Quarterly 18: 105-171.Google Scholar
  9. Bressers, H. Th. A. and L. J. O'Toole (1998). 'The selection of policy instruments: A network-based perspective,' Journal of Public Policy 18 (3): 213-239.Google Scholar
  10. Brinker, R. W. (1997). Best Management Practices for Timber Harvesters. Auburn, Alabama: Alabama Cooperative Extension System, Auburn University.Google Scholar
  11. Canfor Corporation (1992). Annual Report: Canfor Corporation.Google Scholar
  12. Cashore, B. (1997). Governing Forestry: Environmental Group Influence in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest. PhD, University of Toronto.Google Scholar
  13. Cashore, B. (1999). Chapter Three: 'The U.S. Pacific Northwest,' in B. Wilson, K. van Kooten, I., Vertinsky and L. Arthur, eds., Forest Policy: International Case Studies, Oxon, U.K.: CABI Publications.Google Scholar
  14. Cole, B. (1997). 'How structural conflicts stymie reinvention,' Public Administration Review 57 (2): 168-174.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, W. D. (1988). Business and Politics: A Study of Collective Action. Kingston: McGill-Queen's University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Coleman, W. D. (1990). 'The banking policy community and financial change,' in W.D. Coleman and G. Skogstad, eds., Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: A Structural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.Google Scholar
  17. Coleman, W. D. (1991). 'Fencing off: Central banks and networks in Canada and the United States,' in B. Marin and R. Mayntz, ed., Policy Networks: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Considerations. Boulder Colorado; Frankfurt am Main: Westview Press; Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Coleman, W. D. and G. Skogstad (1990). 'Policy communities and policy networks: A structural approach, in Policy Communities and Public Policy in Canada: AStructural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.Google Scholar
  19. Dahl, R. (1961). Who Governs: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Davis, P. A. (1992). 'Critics say too few jobs, owls saved under 'god squad' plan,' Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 50: 1438-1439.Google Scholar
  21. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1991a). 'Introduction,' in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1-40.Google Scholar
  22. DiMaggio, P. J. and W. W. Powell (1991b). 'The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality,' in W. W. Powell and P. J. DiMaggio, eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-82.Google Scholar
  23. Eisner, M. A. (1993). Regulatory Politics in Transition. Edited by Michael Nelson. Interpreting American Politics. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Environment Canada (1998). Enforcement versus voluntary compliance: An examination of the strategic enforcement initiatives implemented by the Pacific Yukon Regional Office of Environment Canada. Ottawa: Environment Canada.Google Scholar
  25. Flick,WA. (1994). 'Changing time: Forest owners and the law,' Journal of Forestry 92 (5): 28-29.Google Scholar
  26. Flick, W. A., A. Barnes and R. A. Tufts (1995). 'Public purpose and private property: The evolution of regulatory taking. Journal of Forestry (June): 21-24.Google Scholar
  27. Galliford, C. (1989). 'Crestbrook head frustrated with public criticism,' Kootenay Advertiser (December 11): 4.Google Scholar
  28. Goddard, T. D. and C. Riback (1998). You Won-Now What: How Americans Can Make Democracy Work from City Hall to the White House. Albany: Scribner.Google Scholar
  29. Gourevitch, P. (1986). Politics in Hard Times: Comparative Responses to International Economic Crises. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Greening, D. W. (1992). 'Organizing for public issues: Environmental and organizational predictors of structure and process,' Markets, Politics, and Social Performance 13: 83-117.Google Scholar
  31. Greening, D.W. and B. Gray (1994). 'Testing a model of organizational response to social and political issues,' Academy of Management Journal 37 (3): 457-498.Google Scholar
  32. Hall, P. (1986). Governing the Economy: The Politics of State Intervention in Britain and France. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Hansen, E. (1998). Chapter 3: 'Certified forest products market place,' in United Nations Timber Committee, ed., Forest Products Annual Market Review, Geneva, Switzerland: United Nations Timber Committee.Google Scholar
  34. Hoberg, G. (1992a). 'Comparing Canadian performance in environmental policy,' in R. Boardman, ed., Canadian Environmental Policy: Ecosystems, Politics, and Process, 1992. Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Hoberg, G. (1992b). Pluralism by Design: Environmental Policy and the American Regulatory State. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  36. Hoberg, G. (1993a). 'Environmental policy: Alternative styles,' in M. M. Atkinson, ed., Governing Canada: Institutions and Public Policy. Toronto: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Canada Inc, pp. 307-342.Google Scholar
  37. Hoberg, G. (1993b). Regulating forestry: A comparison of institutions and policies in British Columbia and the U.S. Pacific Northwest: Forest economics and Policy Analysis Research Unit, the University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  38. Hungerford, A. L. (1994). 'Changing the management of public land forests: The role of the spotted owl injunctions,' Environmental Law 24: 1395-1434.Google Scholar
  39. Hunter, J. and D. Hogben (1998). 'stumpage cuts trigger rehiring in BC forests: The premier's initiative brings negative reaction from U.S. lumber industry,' The Vancouver Sun (May 29): A1-2.Google Scholar
  40. Hyde, B. and W. B. Stuart (1998). Chapter two: 'The U.S. south,' in B. Wilson, K. van Kooten and I. Vertinsky, eds., Forest Policy: International Comparisons. Oxon, U.K.: CAB International.Google Scholar
  41. Jennings, P. D. and P. A. Zandbergen (1995). 'Ecologically sustainable organizations: An institu-tional approach,' Academy ofManagement Review 20 (4): 1015-1052.Google Scholar
  42. Jordan, G. and K. Schubert (1992). 'A preliminary ordering of policy network labels,' European Journal of Political Research 21: 7-27.Google Scholar
  43. Katzenstein, P. (1978). 'Conclusion: Domestic structures and strategies of foreign economic policy,' in P. Katzenstein, ed., Between Power and Plenty. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  44. Kettle, D. F. (1994). Reinventing government?: Appraising the National Performance Review. Washington, DC: Center for Public Management, Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  45. Lindblom, C. (1977). Politics and Markets. NewYork: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  46. Lippke, B. and C. D. Oliver (1993). 'Managing for multiple values: A proposal for the Pacific Northwest,' Journal of Forestry 91 (12): 14-18.Google Scholar
  47. MacMillan Bloedel Pine Hill. (Undated). Putting Down Roots in Alabama. Pine Hill, Alabama: MacMillan Bloedel, Pine Hill.Google Scholar
  48. Marsh, D. and R. A. W. Rhodes (1992). 'Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology,' in Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon PressGoogle Scholar
  49. McMillan, J. (1998). Alabama Forestry Foundation Letter to Forest Educators: Alabama Forestry Association.Google Scholar
  50. Northwest Forestry Association (1994). In Search of Balance: Northwest Forestry Association.Google Scholar
  51. Oliver, C. (1991). 'Strategic responses to institutional processes,' Academy of Management Review 16 (1): 145-179.Google Scholar
  52. Parfitt (1998). A Tale of Two Forest Cities. Pine Hill, Alabama & Port Alberni, BC. Vancouver: BC Wild.Google Scholar
  53. Perpetual Harvest (1995). 'Environmental questions and answers': Woodlands director Frank Walburn talks about MacMilllan Bloedel's Commitment to the Environment. Perpetual Harvest.Google Scholar
  54. Perpetual Harvest (1997). 'sustainability: MB invests in future with SFI commitment,' Perpetual Harvest.Google Scholar
  55. Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995). 'Green and competitive: Ending the stalemate,' Harvard Business Review (September-October): 120-138.Google Scholar
  56. Post, M.E. and B.W. Altman (1992). 'Models of corporate greening: How corporate social policy and organizational learning inform leading-edge environmental management,' Markets, Policies and Social Performance 13: 3-29.Google Scholar
  57. Powell, W. W. and P. J. DiMaggio, eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  58. Pratt, L. and I. Urquhart (1994). The Last Great Forest: Japanese Multinationals and Alberta's Northern Forests. NeWest Press: Edmonton.Google Scholar
  59. Raizada, R. (1998). Corporate Responses to Government and Environmental Group Actions Designed to Protect the Environment. PhD, University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
  60. Reinhardt, F. L. (1994). Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries Inc.: 35. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.Google Scholar
  61. Rowley, T. J. (1997). 'Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences,' The Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 887-910.Google Scholar
  62. Schachter, H. L. (1997). Reinventing Government or Reinventing Ourselves: The Role of Citizen Owners inMaking a Better Government. Albany: State University of NewYork Press.Google Scholar
  63. Scott, W. R. (1987). 'The adolescence of institutional theory,' Administrative Science Quarterly 32: 493-511.Google Scholar
  64. Scott, W. R. (1995). Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Selznick, P. (1957). Leadership in Administration. NewYork: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  66. Sharma, S. (1998). A Theory of Corporate Environmental Responsiveness. St. Mary's University.Google Scholar
  67. Sharma, S. and H. Vredenburg (1998). 'Proactive corporate environmental strategy and the development of competitively valuable organizational capabilities,' Forthcoming in the Strategic Management Journal (September).Google Scholar
  68. Skocpol, T. (1986). 'Bringing the state back in: Strategies of analysis in current research,' in P. B. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer and T. Skocpol, eds., Bringing the State Back In, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Steinmo, S., K. Thelen and F. Longstreth, eds. (1992). Structuring Politics: Historical Institutionalism in Comparative Analysis. Edited by Peter Lange. Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Stuart-Smith, K. and B. Rabik (1996). Ecologically Sustainable Forest Management. Boyle, Alberta: Alberta-Pacific Forest Industries.Google Scholar
  71. Tripp, D., A. Nixon and R. Dunlop (1992). The Application and Effectiveness of the Coastal Fisheries Forestry Guidelines in Selected Cut Blocks on Vancouver Island. Nanaimo, B.C.: D Tripp Biological Consultants Ltd. Prepared for the Ministry of environment, Lands and Parks.Google Scholar
  72. United States. Congress. Office of Technology Assessment. (1992). Forest Service Planning: Accommodating Uses, Producing Outputs, and Sustaining Ecosystems: Office of Technology Assessment.Google Scholar
  73. Vertinsky, I. B. and C. Zietsma (1998). Corporate Greening and Environmental Protection Performance: Static and Dynamic Analysis. Vancouver: Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration.Google Scholar
  74. Walburn, F. (1997a). Inter-Office Correspondence: Forest Land Stewardship Policies. Pine Hill, Alabama: MacMillan Bloedel, Pine Hill.Google Scholar
  75. Walburn, J. (1997b). 'Forest industry: The rest of the story,' Perpetual Harvest.Google Scholar
  76. Walkingstick, T. L. (1996). Pulpwood, Dinettes, and Double-wides: Comparative Case Studies of Forest Dependency in Alabama. Doctor of Philosophy, Auburn University.Google Scholar
  77. Wilson, J. (1990).'Wilderness politics in B.C.: The business dominated state and the containment of environmentalism,' in W. D. Coleman and G. Skogstad, eds., Policy Communities in Canada: A Structural Approach. Mississauga, ON: Copp Clark Pitman Ltd.Google Scholar
  78. Wilson, J. (1998). Talk and Log: Wilderness Politics in British Columbia. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.Google Scholar
  79. Wilson, J. Q. (1994). 'Reinventing public administration,' PS: Political Science and Politics 27 (4): 667-674.Google Scholar
  80. Wondolleck, J. (1985). 'The importance of process in resolving environmental disputes,' Environmental Impact Assessment Review 5 (4): 341-356.Google Scholar
  81. Wondolleck, J. (1986). An evaluation of the U.S. Forest Service Natural Resource Conflict Management Training Program: Final Report. Ann Arbor: Unpublished Manuscript, University of Michigan, Environmental Conflict Project, School of Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  82. Wondolleck, J. M. (1988). Public Lands Conflict and Resolution: Managing National Forest Disputes. Edited by Lawrence Susskind. Environment, Development, and Public Policy. NewYork: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  83. Yaffee, S. L. (1994). The Wisdom of the Spotted Owl: Policy Lessons for a New Century. Covelo, CA: Island Press.Google Scholar
  84. Zucker, L.G. (1983). 'Organizations as institutions,' in S. B. Bacharach, ed., Research in the Sociology of Organizations. Greenwich, Conn: JAI Press, pp. 1-42.Google Scholar
  85. Zucker, L.G. (1987). 'Institutional theories of organizations,' Annual Review of Sociology 13: 443-64.Google Scholar
  86. Zucker, L. G. (1991). 'The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence,' in The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 83-107.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Benjamin Cashore
    • 1
  • Ilan Vertinsky
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Forest Policy Center, School of ForestryAuburn UniversityAuburnU.S.A.
  2. 2.Forest Economics and Policy Analysis Research UnitUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada
  3. 3.International BusinessThe Chinese University of Hong KongHonkong

Personalised recommendations