Plant and Soil

, Volume 217, Issue 1–2, pp 111–117

Clonal strategies of a woody weed: Melia azedarach

  • G.M. Tourn
  • M.F. Menvielle
  • A.L. Scopel
  • B. Pidal


Melia azedarach L., a weedy tree that typically reproduces by seeds, may exhibit clonal growth following disturbance (e.g. fire, herbivory, animal injury). A dynamic and holistic study (sensu Hallé et al., 1978) was carried out in order to determine the architecture and the vegetative growth strategies, in plants collected from undisturbed and disturbed areas in the ‘El Palmar’ National Park. The architectural and morphological observations can be summarized as follows: (a) Tree architecture is determined by a monopodial trunk that produces tiers of orthotropic monopodial branches. (b) The root system consists of a tap root with woody primary lateral roots that exhibit plagiotropic growth and are typically found within the first few centimeters (ca. 4 cm) of the soil profile. (c) Root buds were produced in all (fire treated and control) plagiotropic root cuts when incubated under controlled conditions. Root suckers developed from the differentiation of parenchymatous cells produced by meristematic activity in the cambial zone. The ecological implications of vegetative reproduction on the invasive capacity of this species are discussed.

clonal growth disturbance invasions Melia azedarach root buds root sprouts 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Abrahamson W G 1980 Demography and vegetative reproduction. In Demography and Evolution in Plant Populations. Ed. O T Solbrig. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.Google Scholar
  2. Baker H G 1974 The evolution of weeds. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 5, 1–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barnes B V 1966 The clonal growth habit of American aspens. Ecol. 47, 439–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown A B 1935 Cambial activity, root habit and sucker development in two species of poplar. New Phytol. 34, 163–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cozzo D 1972 Informaciones sobre el cultivo del Paraíso gigante (Melia azedarach) en Misiones, Argentina. Rev. For. Arg. III 4, 127–133.Google Scholar
  6. Hallé F, Oldeman R A A and Tomlinson P B 1978 Tropical trees and forests. Springer, Berlin. 441 p.Google Scholar
  7. Harper J L 1977 Population biology of Plants. Academic Press Inc., San Diego, CA, USA. 892 p.Google Scholar
  8. Jacobs M R 1955 Growth habits of the eucalypts. Commonwelth Goverment Printer, Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, Forest and Timber Bureau.Google Scholar
  9. Jeník J 1994 Clonal growth in woody plants: a review. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. Praha 29, 291–306.Google Scholar
  10. Jones R H and Raynal D J 1986. Spatial distribution and development of root sprouts in Fagus grandifolia (Fagaceae). Am. J. Bot. 73, 1723–1731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Jones R H and Raynal D J 1987 Root sprouting in American beech (Fagus grandifolia): production, survival and the effect of parent tree vigor. Can. J. For. Res. 17, 539–544.Google Scholar
  12. Jones R H and Raynal D J 1988 Root sprouting in American beech (Fagus grandifolia): effects of root injury, root exposure and season. For. Ecol. Manag. 25, 79–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kormanik P P and Brown C L 1967 Root buds and the development of the root suckers in sweet gum. For. Sci. 13, 338–345.Google Scholar
  14. Mabberley D J 1984 A monograph of Melia in Asia and the Pacific. The history of white cedar and persian lilac. Gard. Bull. Sing. 37, 49–64.Google Scholar
  15. Maini J S and Horton K W 1966 Vegetative propagation of Populus spp. I. Influence of temperature on formation and initial growth of aspen suckers. Can. J. Bot. 44, 1183–1189.Google Scholar
  16. Menges E S and Kohfeldt N 1995 Life history strategies of Florida scrub plants in relation to fire. Bull. Torr. Bot. Club 122, 282–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Menvielle M F and Scopel A L 1999 Life history traits of an alien tree invading a national park in temperate South America. 84th Annual Meeting, Ecological Society of America. Book of Abstracts, p 282Google Scholar
  18. Miller N G 1990 The Genera of Meliaceae in the Southeastern United States. J. Arnol. Arb. 71, 453–486.Google Scholar
  19. Mogie M and Hutchings M J 1990 Phylogeny, ontogeny and clonal growth in vascular plants. In Clonal Growth in Plants: Regulation and Function. Eds Van Groenendael and H de Kroon. pp 3–22. Academic Press, The Hague, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  20. Movia C and Menvielle F 1990 Mapa de vegetación del Parque Nacional El Palmar. APN, Bs.As., Argentina.Google Scholar
  21. Panetta F D 1993 A system of assessing proposed plant introductions for weed potential. Pl. Protect. Quart. 8, 10–14.Google Scholar
  22. Pennington T D 1981 A Monograph of Neotropical Meliaceae. In Flora Neotropica. pp 1–27. The New York Botanical Garden.Google Scholar
  23. Pennington T D and Styles B T 1975 A generic Monograph of the Meliaceae. Blumea 22, 419–540.Google Scholar
  24. Radosevich S, Holt J and Ghersa C 1997 Weed Ecology. Implications for Management. John Wiley & Sons Inc., New York. 589 p.Google Scholar
  25. Ragonese A and García A 1980 Identidad botánica de los paraísos gigantes (Melia azedarach var. gigantea cv "Gotz" y cv "Garrasino"). INTA-Castelar, IDiA III, 110–113.Google Scholar
  26. Rauh W1937 Die Bildung von Hypokotyl-undWurzelsprossen unh ihre Bedeutung für die Wuchsformen der Pflanzen. Nova Acta Leopoldiana, N.F. 4, 393–553.Google Scholar
  27. Reichard S E 1997 Prevention of invasive plants Introductions on national and local levels. In Assessment and Management of Plant Invasions. Eds J O Luken and J W Thieret. pp 215–227. Springer, New York, USA.Google Scholar
  28. Reim P 1929 Die Vermehrungsbiologie der Aspe auf Grundlage des im Estland und Finnland gesammelten Untershuchungsmaterial. Univ. Tartu, Tartu.Google Scholar
  29. Rejmánek M 1995 What makes a species invasive? In Plant Invasions. Eds P Pysûk, K Prach, M Rejmánek, P M Wade. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  30. Richardson D M, Cowling R M and LeMaitre D C 1990 Assesing the risk of invasive success in Pinus and Banksia in South African mountain fynbos. J. Veg. Sci. 1, 629–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rinne P, Kauppi A and Fern A 1987 Induction of adventitious buds and sprouts on birch seedlings (Betula pendula Roth and B. Pubescens Ehrh.). Can. J. For. Res. 17, 545–555.Google Scholar
  32. Roy J 1990 In search of the characteristics of plant invaders. In Biological Invasions in Europe and the Mediterranean Basin. Eds F di Castri, J Hansen and M Debussche. pp 335–352. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands.Google Scholar
  33. Schier G A 1973 Origin and development of aspen suckers. Can. J. Bot. Res. 3/1, 45–53.Google Scholar
  34. Tomlinson P B 1980 The biology of trees native to tropical Florida. Harvard Forest, Mass. Allston, Mass.: Harvard University Printing Office. 480 p.Google Scholar
  35. Trabaud L 1987 Fire and the survivals traits of plants. In The Role of Fire in Ecological Systems. pp 65–89. The Hague: SPB Academic.Google Scholar
  36. Trabaud L and Lepart J 1980 Diversity and stability in Garrigue ecosystems after fire. Vegetatio 43, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trabaud L and Lepart J 1981 Changes in floristic composition of a Quercus coccifera L. Garrigue in relation to different fire regimes. Vegetatio 46, 105–116.Google Scholar
  38. Whelan R J 1997 The Ecology of Fire. Cambridge University Press. New York. 346 p.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • G.M. Tourn
    • 1
  • M.F. Menvielle
    • 2
  • A.L. Scopel
    • 3
  • B. Pidal
    • 1
  1. 1.Cátedra de Botánica AgrícolaFacultad de AgronomíaArgentina; FAX No
  2. 2.Administración de Parques NacionalesArgentina
  3. 3.IFEVA-Departamento de EcologíaFacultad de AgronomíaArgentina

Personalised recommendations