Plant and Soil

, Volume 220, Issue 1–2, pp 261–270

Fate of urea-15N in a soil-wheat system as influenced by urease inhibitor hydroquinone and nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide

  • Xingkai Xu
  • Likai Zhou
  • Oswald Van Cleemput
  • Zijian Wang


By applying labeled urea into a loamy meadow brown soil, a pot experiment with spring wheat as test crop was carried out. The results showed that at the end of this experiment, the plant recovery, the soil recovery and the total loss of applied urea 15N was 17.7–23.7%, 43.7–56.3% and 20.0–36.8%, respectively. 15N recovery by wheat grain in any treatment varied within a range of 9.0–14.7% of the applied 15N. A combined application of hydroquinone (HQ) and dicyandiamide (DCD) gave the lowest loss and the highest recoveries in both the plant and soil, while applying HQ or DCD alone had less effect on them. During the whole period of wheat growth, HQ+DCD induced an increasing 15N uptake by plant, and even promoted the translocation of absorbed 15N from stem to grain. In the presence of inhibitors, organic plus chemically fixed 15N occupied a large portion of soil 15N recovery at maturity stage of wheat growth (34.3–50.6%, in contrast to 9.9% in the absence of inhibitors), and DCD and DCD+HQ could remarkably reduce the remaining soil (NO3-+NO2-)-15N. In this pot experiment, the leaching loss of applied 15N was excluded, and hence, the gaseous loss was considered as the main part of the 15N loss. Regarding N loss, N2O flux only occupied a very small part, and its main part was other gaseous N losses. DCD and DCD+HQ retarded N2O flux from the soil-wheat system after treatment with urea and reduced the total N2O flux during the whole period of wheat growth. Treatment with both inhibitors had much lower gaseous N losses than that with HQ or DCD alone. Hence, a proper combination application of HQ and DCD is an efficient way to improve urea-N efficiency and crop quality, while decreasing its loss to the environment.

dicyandiamide gaseous N losses hydroquinone nitrous oxide spring wheat urea-15


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Amberger A 1989 Research on dicyandiamide as a nitrification inhibitor and future outlook. Commun. Soil Sci. Plan. 20(18 & 20), 1933–1956.Google Scholar
  2. Axmann H 1990 Method for 15N determination in use of nuclear techniques in studies of soil-plant relationship. IAEA Training course series No. 2.Google Scholar
  3. Bielek P and Kydeyarov V N 1991 Nitrogen cycles in the present agriculture. Priroda Brastilava. 40 p.Google Scholar
  4. Bremner J M and Blackner A M 1978 Nitrous oxide emission from soils during nitrification of fertilizer nitrogen. Science 199, 295–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bronson K F, Mosier A R and Bishnoi S R 1992 Nitrous oxide emissions in irrigated corn as affected by nitrification inhibitors. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 56(1), 161–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen G X, Shang S H and Yu G W 1990 Preliminary studies on plant-mediated nitrous oxide flux. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 1(1), 94-96 (Chinese, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  7. Chen X, Shen S M, Zhang L and Wu J 1997 Effect of nutritional condition on N2O emission by crop seedlings - a sandliquid cross culture study. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 8(2), 177–180 (Chinese, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  8. FAO 1982 Unesco Document D: Draft definitions of soil units at high level (Rome).Google Scholar
  9. Fleisker Z and Hagin J 1981 Lowering ammonia volatilization losses from urea application by activation of nitrification process. Fert. Res. 2, 101–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorelik L A, Gritsevich Y G, Krishchenko E F, Paeskaya N I and Golov V G 1985 Increasing the effectiveness of urea using the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide. Agrokhimiya 6, 23–28 (Russian, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  11. Gorelik L A, Yanishevskii F V, Podkolzina G A, Golov V G and Yanishevsky F V 1992 Efficiency of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide in field experiments of the NIUIF geo-network. Agrokhimiya 9, 14–33 (Russian, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  12. Guiraud G, Marol C and Thibaud M C 1989 Mineralization of nitrogen in the presence of a nitrification inhibitor. Soil Biol. Biochem. 21(1), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hauser M and Haselwandter K 1990 Degradation of dicyandiamide by soil bacteria. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22(1), 113–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Juma N G and Paul E A 1983 Effect of a nitrification inhibitor on N immobilization and release of 15N from nonexchangeable ammonium and microbial biomass. Can. J. Soil Sci. 63(2), 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Klepper L 1990 Comparison between NOx evolution mechanisms of wild-type and mutant soybean leaves. Plant Physiol. 93, 26–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mason M G 1987 Effects of dicyandiamide (a nitrification inhibitor) on leaching of nitrogen and growth of cereals. Aust. J. Exp. Agr. 27(1), 127–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McTaggart I, Clayton H and Smith K 1994 Nitrous oxide flux from fertilized grassland: strategies for reducing emissions. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gases. Maastricht, December 1993. pp 421–426. Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  18. Mosdell D K, Daniel W H and Freeborg R P 1986 Evaluation of dicyandiamide-amended fertilizers on Kentucky bluegrass. Agron. J. 78(5), 801–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Mosier A R, Duxbury J M, Freney J R, Heinemeyer O and Minami K 1996 Nitrous oxide emissions from agricultural fields: assessment, measurement and mitigation. Plant Soil 181, 95–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Page A L 1982 Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. In Chemical and Microbiological Properties, 2nd edn. pp 643–724. America Society of Agronomy, Inc. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.Google Scholar
  21. Prakasa Rao E V S and Puttanna K 1994 Evaluation of dicyandiamide treated urea in Java citronella. Indian J. Soil Sci. 42(1), 54–59.Google Scholar
  22. Pruden G, Powlson D S and Jenkinson D S 1985 The measurement of 15N in soil and plant material. Fert. Res. 6, 205–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Recous S and Machet J-M 1999 Short-term immobilisation and crop uptake of fertiliser nitrogen applied to winter wheat: effect of date of application in spring. Plant Soil 206, 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Recous S, Fresneau C, Faurie G and Mary B 1988a The fate of labelled 15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to winter wheat crop. I - Nitrogen transformations in the soil. Plant Soil 112, 205–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Recous S, Machet J-M and Mary B 1988b The fate of labelled 15N urea and ammonium nitrate applied to a winter wheat crop. II - Plant uptake and N efficiency. Plant Soil 112, 215–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Rockel P, Rockel A and Wildt J 1996 Nitric oxide (NO) emission by higher plants. In Progress in Nitrogen Cycling Studies. Ed. O Van Cleemput. pp 603–606. Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands.Google Scholar
  27. Schwarzer C and Haselwandter K 1991 Enzymatic degradation of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide by a soil bacterium. Soil Biol. Biochem. 23(3), 309–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Simpson J R, Freney J R, Muirhead W A and Leuning R 1985 Effects of phenylphosphorodiamidate and dicyandiamide on nitrogen loss from flooded rice. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 49, 1426–1431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Skiba U, Smith K A and Fowler D 1993 Nitrification and denitrification as sources of nitric oxide and nitrous oxide in a sandy loam soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 25(11), 1527–1536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stevenson F G 1982 Nitrogen in agricultural soil. Madison, W isconsin, USA. 105 p.Google Scholar
  31. Tomar J S, Kirby P C and Mackenzie A F 1985 Field evaluation of the effects of urease inhibitor and crop residues on urea hydro270 lysis, ammonia volatilization and yield of cron. Can. J. Soil Sci. 65, 771–789.Google Scholar
  32. Vilsmeier K 1991a Turnover of 15N ammonium sulfate with dicyandiamide under aerobic and anaerobic soil conditions. Fert. Res. 29(3), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Vilsmeier K 1991b Fate of ammonium-N in pot studies as affected by DCD addition. Fert. Res. 29(3), 187–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wang Z P, O Van Cleemput, Li L T and Baert L 1991 Effect of organic matter and urease inhibitors on urea hydrolysis and immobilization of urea nitrogen in an alkaline soil. Biol. Fert. Soils 11, 101–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Xu X K 1998 Applying fertilizer and environment. Chinese J. Nat. Resour. Environ. Ecol. 9(2), 7–12 (Chinese, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  36. Yadvinder S and Beauchamp E G 1988 Nitrogen transformations near urea in soil: effects of nitrification inhibitor, nitrifier activity and liming. Fert. Res. 18(3), 201–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao X Y, Zhou L K and Wu G Y 1992 Urea hydrolysis in a brown soil: effect of hydroquinone. Soil Biol. Biochem. 24(2), 165–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Zhou L K, Xu X K, Chen L J, Li R H and Van Cleemput O 1999 Effect of hydroquinone and dicyandiamide on N2O and CH4 emissions from lowland rice soil. Chinese J. Appl. Ecol. 10(2), 189–192 (Chinese, abstract with English).Google Scholar
  39. Zhu Z L and Wen Q X 1990 Nitrogen in soil of China. Science and Technology Publishing House, Nanjing. 185 p.Google Scholar
  40. Zhu Z L, Cai G X, Xu Y H and Zhang S L 1985 Studies on ammonia volatilization of N fertilizers for flooded rice and its importance of N loss. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 22, 320–328 (Chinese, abstract with English).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Xingkai Xu
  • Likai Zhou
  • Oswald Van Cleemput
  • Zijian Wang

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations