Psychiatric Quarterly

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 1–13 | Cite as

The Use of Advance Directives by Persons with Serious Mental Illness for Psychiatric Treatment

  • Jeffrey L. Geller
Article

Abstract

Objective. A health care proxy is an advance directive that allows an individual to indicate in writing who can act on his behalf when he lacks the capacity to make health care decisions, and what limitations he is placing on this authority. Of great interest in medical settings, health care proxies are beginning to receive more attention in psychiatric settings. Are these proxies useful when applied to psychiatric treatment decisions? This paper examines health care proxies in Massachusetts and their potential use for decisions about psychiatric interventions at one Massachusetts state hospital. Method. A point in time study of a state hospital's entire census was done by reviewing all patients' records for demographic, diagnostic, and legal data, and for the presence and content of the state required health care proxy form. Results. Of the 161 patients in the hospital, 71 (44%) had full guardians and were ineligible to complete their own proxies. Of the remaining 90 patients, 53 (33% of the total population) had a proxy form in their chart, but 34 (21%) of these patients refused to sign them. Of the 19 (12%) signed proxies, 16 (10%) of the patients were deemed competent to have executed meaningful health care proxies. Conclusions. This preliminary analysis reveals that only 10% of a state hospital population had meaningful health care proxies. Further outcome studies are needed to determine if the process of offering health care proxies and the presence of properly executed proxies are meaningful and beneficial to chronically ill psychiatric patients.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.
    Lennon J: Beautiful Boy. Lenono Music, 81, 1980.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szasz TS: The psychiatric will. American Psychologist 37:762-770, 1982.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosenson MK, Kasten AM: Another view of autonomy: Arranging for consent in advance. Schizophrenia Bulletin 17:1-14, 1991.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Matter of Rosa M., 597 N.Y.S. 2d 544 (1991).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health, 110 S. Ct. 2841 (1990).Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    American Psychiatric Association Division of Government Relations. State Update. December, 1992.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Appelbaum PS: Advance directives for psychiatric treatment. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 42:983-984, 1991.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Backlar P, McFarland BH: A survey on use of advance directives for mental health treatment in Oregon. Psychiatric Services 47:1387-1389, 1996.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cross J, Fleischner R, Elder J: Guardianship and Conservatorship in Massachusetts. Salem, N.H., Butterworth Legal Publishers, 1994.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Appelbaum PS, Grisso T: Assessing patients' capacities to consent to treatment. New England Journal of Medicine 319:1635-1638, 1988.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Appelbaum PS: Voluntary hospitalization and due process: The dilemma of JEFFREY L. GELLER 13 Zinermon v. Burch. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 41:1059-1060, 1990.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hoge SK, Appelbaum PS, Geller JL: Involuntary treatment, in Tassman A, Hales RE, Frances AJ, American Psychiatric Press Review of Psychiatry. Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Press, 1989 pp. 432-450.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Geller JL, McDermeit M, Grudzinskas AJ et.al.: A competency-based approach to court-ordered outpatient treatment. In MR Munetz (Ed): Can Mandatory Treatment be Therapeutic? New Directions for Mental Health Services no. 75. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, 1997, pp. 81-95.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Barton CD, Mallik HS, Orr WB, Janofsky JS: Clinicians' judgment of capacity of nursing home patients to give informed consent. Psychiatric Services 47: 956-960, 1996.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Geller JL: ''Anyplace but the state hospital'': Examining assumptions about the benefits of admission diversion. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 42:145-151, 1991.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Geller JL, Fisher WH, Simon LJ, Wirth-Cauchon J: Second-generation deinstitutionalization, II: The impact of Brewster v. Dukakis on correlates of community and hospital utilization. American Journal of Psychiatry 147:988-993, 1990.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Geller JL, Fisher WH: The linear continuum of transitional residences: Debunking the myth. American Journal of Psychiatry 150:1070-1076, 1993.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rogers JA, Centifanti JB: Beyond ''self-paternalism'': Response to Rosenson and Kasten. Schizophrenia Bulletin 17:9-14, 1991.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Sales GN: The health care proxy for mental illness: Can it work and should we want it to? Bulletin of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 21:161-179, 1993.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Perling LJ: Health care advance directives: Implications for Florida mental health patients. University of Miami Law Review 48:193-228, 1993.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sherman PS: Advance directives for involuntary psychiatric care. Proceedings of the National Symposium on Involuntary Interventions: The Call for a National Legal and Medical Response. Houston, Texas, University of Texas, 1995.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Munetz MR, Geller JL: The least restrictive alternative in the postinstitutional era. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 44:967-973, 1993.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Backlar P: The longing for order: Oregon's medical advance directive for mental health treatment. Community Mental Health Journal 31:103-108, 1995.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ritchie J, Sklar R, Steiner W: Advance directives in psychiatry. Resolving issues of autonomy and competence. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 21:245-260, 1998.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lee MA, Smith DM, Fenn DS et al: Do patients' treatment decisions match advance statements of their preferences? Journal of Clinical Ethics 9:258-262, 1998.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Human Sciences Press, Inc. 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey L. Geller
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Massachusetts Medical SchoolWorcester

Personalised recommendations