Social Indicators Research

, Volume 50, Issue 3, pp 351–362 | Cite as

What Makes You Happy?: A Comparison of Self-reported Criteria of Happiness Between Two Cultures

  • Dong Yul Lee
  • Sung Hee Park
  • Max R. Uhlemann
  • Philip Patsult


Based on the cross-cultural psychosocial notion of individualism and collectivism, comparisons between two contrasting cultures with regard to the criteria for avowed happiness were made. The Happiness Questionnaire, which contains four open-ended questions (e.g., “What makes you happy?”), and two objective items assessing the level of perceived happiness were administered to Canadian and Korean students. The responses to the four questions were content-analyzed along 14 categories. Comparisons of the proportions in each of the 14 categories revealed that, although the students from the two cultures differed in their absolute level of perceived happiness, they seemed to employ essentially the same ordered set of criteria in expressing their avowed happiness.


Absolute Level Korean Student Objective Item Avowed Happiness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Balatsky, G. and E. Diener: 1993, ‘A comparison of the well-being of Soviet and American students’, Social Indicators Research 28, pp. 225–243.Google Scholar
  2. Campbell, A.: 1976, ‘Subjectivemeasures of well-being’, American Psychologist 31, pp. 117–124.Google Scholar
  3. Diener, E.: 1984, ‘Subjective well-being’, Psychological Bulletin 95, pp. 542–575.Google Scholar
  4. Diener, E. and M. Diener: 1995, ‘Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, pp. 653–663.Google Scholar
  5. Diener, E. and F. Fujita: 1995, ‘Resources, personal strivings, and subjective wellbeing: A nomothetic and ideographic approach’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68, pp. 926–935.Google Scholar
  6. Diener, E., E. M. Suh, H. Smith and L. Shao: 1995 ‘National difference in reported subjective well-being: Why do they occur?’, Social Indicators Research 34, pp. 7–32.Google Scholar
  7. Fordyce, M. W.: 1988, ‘A review of research on the happiness measures: A sixty second index of happiness and mental health’, Social Indicators Research 20, pp. 355–381.Google Scholar
  8. Frisch, M. B., J. Cornell, M. Villanueva and P. Retzlaff: 1992, ‘Clinical validation of the Quality of Life Inventory: A measure of life satisfaction for use in treatment planning and outcome assessment’, Psychological Assessment 4, pp. 92–101.Google Scholar
  9. Hui, C. H. and C. H. Triandis: 1986, ‘Individualism – collectivism: A study of cross-cultural researchers’, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 17, pp. 225–248.Google Scholar
  10. Kammann, R. and R. Flett.: 1983, ‘Affectometer 2: A scale to measure current level of general happiness’, Australian Journal of Psychology 35, pp. 257–265.Google Scholar
  11. Michalos, A. C.: 1991, Global Report on Student Well-Being (Springer-Verlag, New York).Google Scholar
  12. Myers, D. G.: 1992, Pursuit of Happiness (William Morrow, New York).Google Scholar
  13. Ouweneel, P. and R. Veenhoven: 1991. ‘Cross-national differences in happiness: Cultural bias or societal quality? in N. Bleichrodt and P. J. D. Drenth (eds.), Contemporary Issues in Cross-Cultural Psychology (Swets and Zeitlinger, Amsterdam), pp. 168–184.Google Scholar
  14. Pavot, W. and E. Diener: 1993, ‘Review of the satisfaction with life scale’, Psychological Assessment 5, pp. 164–172.Google Scholar
  15. Shin, D. C. and D. M. Johnson: 1978, ‘Avowed happiness as an overall assessment of the quality of life’, Social Indicators Research 5, pp. 475–492.Google Scholar
  16. Siegel, S. and N. J. Castellan, Jr.: 1988, Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences (McGraw-Hill, New York).Google Scholar
  17. Triandis, H. C.: 1989a, ‘Cross-cultural studies of individualism and collectivism’, in J. J. Berman (ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation 37 (University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln), pp. 41–133.Google Scholar
  18. Triandis, H. C.: 1989b, ‘The self and social behavior in differing cultural contexts’, Psychological Review 96, pp. 506–520.Google Scholar
  19. Triandis, H. C., R. Bontempo, M. J. Villareal, M. Asai and N. Lucca: 1988, ‘Indivisualism and collectivism: Cross-cultural perspectives on self-ingroup relationships’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54, pp. 323–338.Google Scholar
  20. Triandis, H. C., R. Brislin and H. Hui: 1988, ‘Cross-cultural training across the individualism-collectivism divide’, International Journal of Intercultural Relations 12, pp. 269–289.Google Scholar
  21. Veenhoven, R.: 1984, Conditions of Happiness (Kluwer Boston Academic Publishers, Hingham).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Dong Yul Lee
    • 1
  • Sung Hee Park
    • 2
  • Max R. Uhlemann
    • 3
  • Philip Patsult
    • 4
  1. 1.University of Western OntarioLondonCananda
  2. 2.National College of EducationChung-jooKorea
  3. 3.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada
  4. 4.University of OttawaOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations