Plant and Soil

, Volume 224, Issue 1, pp 153–170 | Cite as

Dynamics of mineral N availability in grassland ecosystems under increased [CO2]: hypotheses evaluated using the Hurley Pasture Model

  • John H. M. Thornley
  • Melvin G. R. Cannell
Article

Abstract

The following arguments are outlined and then illustrated by the response of the Hurley Pasture Model to [CO2] doubling in the climate of southern Britain. 1. The growth of N-limited vegetation is determined by the concentration of N in the soil mineral N pools and high turnover rates of these pools (i.e., large input and output fluxes) contribute positively to growth. 2. The size and turnover rates of the soil mineral N pools are determined overwhelmingly by N cycling into all forms of organic matter (plants, animals, soil biomass and soil organic matter — `immobilisation' in a broad sense) and back again by mineralisation. Annual system N gains (by N2 fixation and atmospheric deposition) and losses (by leaching, volatilisation, nitrification and denitrification) are small by comparison. 3. Elevated [CO2] enriches the organic matter in plants and soils with C, which leads directly to increased removal of N from the soil mineral N pools into plant biomass, soil biomass and soil organic matter (SOM). ‘Immobilisation’ in the broad sense then exceeds mineralisation. This is a transient state and as long as it exists the soil mineral N pools are depleted, N gaseous and leaching losses are reduced and the ecosystem gains N. Thus, net immobilisation gradually increases the N status of the ecosystem. 4. At the same time, elevated [CO2] increases symbiotic and non-symbiotic N2 fixation. Thus, more N is gained each year as well as less lost. Effectively, the extra C fixed in elevated [CO2] is used to capture and retain more N and so the N cycle tracks the C cycle. 5. However, the amount of extra N fixed and retained by the ecosystem each year will always be small (ca. 5–10 kg N ha-1 yr-1) compared with amount of N in the immobilisation-mineralisation cycle (ca. 1000 kg N ha-1 yr-1). Consequently, the ecosystem can take decades to centuries to gear up to a new equilibrium higher-N state. 6. The extent and timescale of the depletion of the mineral N pools in elevated [CO2] depends on the N status of the system and the magnitude of the overall system N gains and losses. Small changes in the large immobilisation—mineralisation cycle have large effects on the small mineral N pools. Consequently, it is possible to obtain a variety of growth responses within 1–10 year experiments. Ironically, ecosystem models — artificial constructs — may be the best or only way of determining what is happening in the real world.

climate change immobilisation mineralisation N-turnover nitrogen soil organic matter 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ACSL 1995. Advanced continuous simulation language (ACSL) Reference Manual. Aegis Research Corporation, 919-B Willowbrook Drive, Huntsville, AL. 35802, USA. Ph: 256-81-0947.Fax: 256-883-5516. E-mail: acsl-sales@aegisrc.com WWW: www.ACSL.sim.com Google Scholar
  2. Amthor J S 1994 Plant respiratory responses to the environment and their effects on the carbon balance. In Plant-Environment Interactions. Ed. R E Wilkinson. pp 501–554. Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Amthor J S 1995 Terrestrial higher-plant responses to increasing [CO2] in relation to the global carbon cycle. Global Change Biol. 1, 243–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arah J R M, Thornley J H M, Poulton P R and Richter D D 1997 Simulating trends in soil organic carbon in long-trem experiments using the ITE (Edinburgh) Forest and Pasture ecosystem models. Geoderma 81, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berntson G M and Bazzaz F A 1997 Nitrogen cycling in microcosms of yellow birch exposed to elevated CO2: simultaneous positive and negative below-ground feedbacks. Global Change Biol. 3, 247–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cannell M G R and Thornley J H M 1998 N-poor ecosystems may respond more to elevated [CO2] the N-rich ones in the long term. A model analysis of grassland. Global Change Biol. 4, 431–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Casella E, Soussana J F and Loiseau P 1996 Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on a temperate grass sward. Plant Soil 182, 83–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceulemans, R and Mousseau, M 1994 Effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 on woody plants. New Phytol. 127, 425–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Charles-Edwards D A, Doley D and Rimington G M 1986 Modelling Plant Growth and Development. Academic Press, North Ryde.Google Scholar
  10. Clarkson D T, Jones L H P and Purves J V 1992 Absorption of nitrate and ammonium ions by Lolium perenne from flowing solution cultures at low root temperatures. Plant Cell Environ. 15, 99–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cotrufo M F, Ineson P and Scott A 1998 Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Global Change Biol. 4, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coughenour MB and Chen D-X 1997 Assessment of grassland ecosystem responses to atmospheric change using linked plant-soil process models. Ecol. Appl. 7, 802–827.Google Scholar
  13. Curtis P S and Wang X 1998 A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form and physiology. Oecologia 113, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Delucia E H, Callaway R M, Thomas E M and Schlesinger W H 1997 Mechanisms of phosphorus acquisition for Ponderosa pine seedlings under high CO2 and temperature. Ann. Bot. 79, 111–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Diaz S, Grime J P, Harris J and McPherson J 1993 Evidence of a feedback mechanism limiting plant response to elevated CO2. Nature 364, 616–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Farquhar G D 1989 Models of integrated photosynthesis of cells and leaves. Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London B 323, 357–367.Google Scholar
  17. France J and Thornley J H M 1984 Mathematical Modelling in Agriculture. Butterworths, London.Google Scholar
  18. Gifford R M, Barrett D J, Lutze J L and Samarakoon A B 1996 Agriculture and global change: scaling direct carbon dioxide impacts and feedbacks through time. In Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Eds B Walker and W Steffen. pp 229–259. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  19. Hunt H W, Trlica M J, Redente E F, Moore J C, Detling J K, Kittel T G F, Walter D E, Fowler M C, Klein D A and Elliot E T 1991 Simulation model for the effects of climate change on temperate grassland ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 53, 205–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Idso K B and Idso S B 1994 Plant responses to elevated CO2 enrichment in the face of environmental constraints: a review of the past 10 years research. Agric. For. Meteor. 69, 153–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ineichen K, Weimken V and Wiemken A 1995 Shoots, roots and ectomycorrhiza formation of pine seedlings at elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarvis S C, Stockdale E A, Shepherd MA and Powlson D S 1996 Nitrogen mineralization in temperate agricultural soils: processes and measurement. Adv. Agron. 57, 187–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Jenkinson D S 1990 The turnover of organic carbon and nitrogen in soil. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 329, 361–368.Google Scholar
  24. Jones M B, Jongen M and Doyle T 1996 Effects of elevated carbon dioxide concentrations on agricultural grassland production. Agric For. Meteor. 79, 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Jones M B, Leafe E L, Styles W and Collett B 1978 Pattern of respiration of perennial ryegrass in the field. Ann. Bot. 42, 693–703.Google Scholar
  26. Jones T H, Thompson L J, Lawton J H, Bezemer TM, Bardgett R D, Blackburn T M, Bruce K D, Cannon P F, Hall G S, Hartley S E, Howson G, Jones C G, Kampichler C, Kandeler E and Ritchie D A 1998 Impacts of rising atmospheric carbon dioxide on model terrestrial ecosystems. Science 280, 441–443.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jongen M, Jones M B, Hebeisen T, Blum H and Hendrey G 1995 The effects of elevated CO2 concentrations on the root growth of Lolium perenne and Trifolium repens grown in a FACE system. Global Change Biol. 1, 361–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kirschbaum M U F and Farquhar G D 1987 Investigation of the CO2 dependence of quantum yield and respiration in Eucalyptus pauciflora. Plant Physiol. 83, 1032–1036.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Kirschbaum M U F, King D A, Comins H N, McMurtrie R E, Medlyn B E, Pongrcic S, Murty D, Keith R J, Khanna P K and Sheriff D W 1994 Modelling forest response to increasing CO2 concentration under nutrient-limited conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 1081–1099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kirschbaum M U F, Medlyn B E, King D A, Pongracic S, Murty D, Keith H, Khanna P K, Snowdon P and Raison R J 1998 Modelling forest-growth response to increasing CO2 concentration in relation to various factors affecting nutrient supply. Global Change Biol. 4, 23–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Korner Ch and Miglietta F 1994 Long term effects of naturally elevated CO2 on mediterranean grassland and forest trees. Oecologia 99, 343–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leverenz J Wand O quist G 1987 Quantum yields of photosynthesis at temperatures between -2 ºC and 35 ºC in a cold-tolerant C3 plant (Pinus sylvestris) during the course of one year. Plant Cell Environ. 10, 287–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Luo Y, Field C B and Mooney H A 1994 Predicting responses of photosynthesis and root fraction to elevated CO2: interactions among carbon, N and growth. Plant Cell Environ. 17, 1195–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lutze J L and Gifford R M 1995 Carbon storage and productivity of a carbon dioxide enriched nitrogen limited grass sward after one year's growth. J. Biogeog. 22, 227–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McMurtrie R E and Comins H N 1996 The temporal response of forest ecosystems to doubled atmospheric CO2 concentration. Global Change Biol. 2, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Medlyn B E and Dewar R C 1996 Amodel of the long-term response of carbon allocation and productivity of forests to increased CO2 concentration and nitrogen deposition. Global Change Biol. 2, 367–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Monsi M and Saeki T 1953 Uber den Lichtfaktor in den Pflanzengesellschaften und seine Bedeutung für die Stoffproduktion. Jap. J. Bot. 14, 22–52.Google Scholar
  38. Nasholm T, Ekblad A, Nordin A, Giesler R, Hogberg M and Hogberg P 1998 Boreal forest plants take up organic nitrogen. Nature 392, 914–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Parton W J, Coughenour M B, Scurlock J M O, Ojima D S, Gilmanov T G, Scholes R J, Schimel D S, Kirchner T B, Menaut J-C, Seastedt T R, Garcia Moya E, Kamnalrut A, Kinyamario J I and Hall D O 1996 Global grassland ecosystem modelling: development and test of ecosystem models for grassland systems. In Global Change: Effects on Coniferous Forests and Grasslands (SCOPE 56). Eds. A I Breymeyer, D O Hall, J M Melillo and G I Agren. pp 229–267. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester.Google Scholar
  40. Paterson E, Hall J M, Rattray E A S, Griffiths B S, Ritz K and Killham K 1997 Effect of elevated CO2 on rhizosphere carbon flow and soil microbial processes. Global Change Biol. 3, 363–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poorter H 1993 Interspecific variation in the growth response of plants to an elevated CO2 concentration. Vegetatio 104, 77–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rastetter E B, Agren G I And Shaver G R 1997 Responses of N-limited ecosystems to increased CO2: a balanced-nutrition, coupled-element-cycles model. Ecol. Appl. 7, 444–460.Google Scholar
  43. Rice C W, Garcia F, Hampton C O and Owensby C E 1994 Soil microbial response in tallgrass prairie to elevated CO2. Plant Soil 165, 67–74.Google Scholar
  44. Robinson D, Linchen D J and Caul S 1991 What limits nitrate uptake from soils? Plant Cell Environ. 14, 77–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ryan M G 1995 Foliar maintenance respiration of subalpine and boreal trees and shrubs in relation to nitrogen content. Plant Cell Environ. 18, 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saxe H, Ellsworth D S and Heath J 1998 Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytol. 139, 395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Serraj R, Sinclair T R and Allen L H 1998 Soybean nodulation and N2 fixation response to drought under carbon dioxide enrichment. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 491–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Soussana J F, Casella E and Loiseau P 1996 Long-term effects of CO2 enrichment and temperature increase on a temperate grass sward. Plant Soil 182, 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Stulen I and den Hertog J 1993 Root growth and functioning under atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Vegetatio 104/105, 99–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Svenning M M, Junttila O and Macduff J H 1996 Differential rates of inhibition of N2 fixation by sustained low concentrations of NH4+ and NO3_ in northern ecotypes of white clover (Trifolium repens L.). J. Exp. Bot. 47, 729–738.Google Scholar
  51. Thornley J H M 1972 A model to describe the partitioning of photosynthate during vegetative plant growth. Ann. Bot. 36, 419–430.Google Scholar
  52. Thornley J H M 1998a Grassland Dynamics. An Ecosystem Simulation Model. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  53. Thornley J H M 1998b Dynamic model of leaf photosynthesis with acclimation to light and nitrogen. Ann. Bot. 81, 421–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Thornley J H M and Cannell M G R 1997 Temperate grassland responses to climate change: an analysis using the Hurley Pasture Model. Ann. Bot. 80, 205–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tschaplinski T J, Norby R J and Wullschleger S D 1993 Response of loblolly pine seedlings to elevated CO2 and fluctuating water supply. Tree Physiol. 13, 283–296.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Whitehead D C 1995 Grassland Nitrogen. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  57. Zanetti S, Hartwig U A, van Kessel C, Luscher A, Hebeisen T, Frehner M, Fischer B U, Hendrey G R, Blum H and Nosberger J 1997 Does nitrogen nutrition restrict the CO2 response of fertile grassland lacking legumes? Oecologia 112, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zanetti S, Hartwig U A and Nosberger J 1998 Elevated atmospheric CO2 does not affect per se the preference for symbiotic nitrogen as opposed to mineral nitrogen of Trifolium repens L. Plant Cell Environ. 21, 623–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • John H. M. Thornley
  • Melvin G. R. Cannell

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations