Plant and Soil

, Volume 224, Issue 1, pp 15–29 | Cite as

Nitrogen resorption in senescing tree leaves in a warmer, CO2-enriched atmosephere

  • Richard J. Norby
  • Tammy M. Long
  • Jennifer S. Hartz-Rubin
  • Elizabeth G. O'Neill

Abstract

The prediction that litter quality, and hence litter decomposition rates, would be reduced when plants are grown in a CO2-enriched atmosphere has been based on the observation that foliar N concentrations usually are lower in elevated [CO2]. The implicit assumption is that the N concentration in leaf litter reflects the N concentration in green leaves. Here we evaluate that assumption by exploring whether the process of seasonal nutrient resorption is different in CO2-enriched plants. Nitrogen resorption was studied in two species of maple trees (Acer rubrum L. and A. saccharum Marsh.), which were planted in unfertilized soil and grown in open-top chambers with ambient or elevated [CO2] in combination with ambient or elevated temperature. In the second growing season, prior to autumn senescence, individual leaves were collected and analyzed for N and dry matter content. Other leaves at the same and an adjacent node were collected for analysis as they senesced and abscised. This data set was augmented with litter samples from the first growing season and with green leaves and leaf litter collected from white oak (Quercus alba L.) saplings grown in ambient and elevated [CO2] in open-top chambers. In chambers maintained at ambient temperature, CO2 enrichment reduced green leaf N concentrations by 25% in A. rubrum and 19% in A. saccharum. CO2 enrichment did not significantly reduce resorption efficiency so the N concentration also was reduced in litter. There were, however, few effects of [CO2] on N dynamics in these leaves; differences in N concentration usually were the result of increased dry matter content of leaves. The effects of elevated [CO2] on litter N are inherently more difficult to detect than differences in green leaves because factors that affect senescence and resorption increase variability. This is especially so when other environmental factors cause a disruption in the normal progress of resorption, such as in the first year when warming delayed senescence until leaves were killed by an early frost. The results of this experiment support the approach used in ecosystem models in which resorption efficiency is constant in ambient and elevated [CO2], but the results also indicate that other factors can alter resorption efficiency.

atmospheric carbon dioxide climate change litter quality resorption retranslocation senescence 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aerts R 1996 Nutrient resorption from senescing leaves of perennials: are there general patterns? J. Ecol. 84, 597–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arp WJ, Kuikman P J and Gorissen A 1997 Climate change: the potential to affect ecosystem functions through changes in amount and quality of litter. In Driven by Nature. Plant Litter Quality and Decomposition. Eds G. Cadisch and K E Giller. pp 187-200. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon.Google Scholar
  3. Chapin F S III and Kedrowski R A 1983 Seasonal changes in nitrogen and phosphorus fractions and autumn retranslocation in evergreen and deciduous taiga trees. Ecology 64, 376–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapin F S III and Moilanen L 1991 Nutritional controls over nitrogen and phosphorus resorption from Alaskan birch leaves. Ecology 72, 709–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chapin F S III, Schulze E-D and Mooney H A 1990 The ecology and economics of storage in plants. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21, 423–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Comins H N and McMurtrie R E 1993 Long-term response of nutrient-limited forests to CO2 enrichment: Equilibrium behavior of plant-soil models. Ecol. Appl. 3, 666–681.Google Scholar
  7. Cotrufo M F and Ineson P 1996 Elevated CO2 reduces field decomposition rates of Betula pendula (Roth) leaf litter. Oecologia 106, 525–530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cotrufo M F, Ineson P and Scott A 1998 Elevated CO2 reduces the nitrogen concentration of plant tissues. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Curtis P S, B G Drake and D F Whigham 1989 Nitrogen and carbon dynamics in C3 and C4 estuarine marsh plants grown under elevated CO2 in situ. Oecologia 78, 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Curtis P S and Wang X 1998 A meta-analysis of elevated CO2 effects on woody plant mass, form and physiology. Oecologia 113, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fanizza G, Della Gatta C and Bagnulo C 1991 A non-destructive determination of leaf chlorophyll in Vitis vinifera. Ann. Appl. Biol. 119, 203–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Field C B, Chapin F S III, Matson P A and Mooney H A 1992 Responses of terrestrial ecosystems to the changing atmosphere: A resource-based approach. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23, 201–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Grizzard T, Henderson G S, Clebsch E E C and Reichle D E 1976 Seasonal nutirent dynamics of foliage and litterfall on Walker Branch, a deciduous forest ecosystem. ORNL/TM-5254, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
  14. Killingbeck K T 1996 Nutrients in senesced leaves: keys to the search for potential resorption and resorption proficiency. Ecology 77, 1716–1727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Larigauderie A, Hilbert D W and Oechel W C 1988 Effect of CO2 enrichment and nitrogen availability on resource acquisition and resource allocation in a grass, Bromus mollis. Oecologia 77, 544–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lichtenthaler H K and Wellburn A R 1983 Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 603, 591–592.Google Scholar
  17. Lindroth R L, Kinney K K and Platz C L 1993 Responses of deciduous trees to elevated atmospheric CO2: Productivity, phytochemistry and insect performance. Ecology 74, 763–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. McGuire A D, Melillo J M and Joyce L A 1995 The role of nitrogen in the response of forest net primary production to elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 26, 473–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McMurtrie R E, Dewer R C, Medlyn B E and Jeffreys M P 2000 Effects of elevated [CO2] on forest growth and carbon storage: a modelling analysis of the consequences of changes in litter quality/quantity and root exudation. Plant Soil 224, 135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Melillo J M and Gosz J R 1983 Interactions of biogeochemical cycles in forest ecosystems. In The Major Biogeochemical Cycles and Their Interactions. Eds B Bolin and R B Cook. pp 177–222. John Wiley, Chichester.Google Scholar
  21. Mooney H A, Canadell J, Chapin F S, Ehleriger J, Körner Ch, McMurtrie R, Parton W J, Pitelka L and Schulze E-D 1999 Ecosystem physiology responses to global change. In Implications of Global Change for Natural and Managed Ecosystems: A Synthesis of GCTE and Related Research. Eds B H Walker, W L Steffen, J Canadell and J S I Ingram. pp 141–189. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  22. Norby R J 1998 Nitrogen deposition: A component of global change analyses. New Phytol. 139, 189–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Norby R J and Cotrufo MF 1998 Global change: A question of litter quality. Nature 396, 17–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norby R J, Edwards N T, Riggs J S, Abner C H, Wullschleger S D and Gunderson C A 1997 Temperature-controlled opentop chambers for global change research. Glob. Change Biol. 3, 259–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Norby, R J, O'Neill E G, and Wullschleger S D 1995 Belowground responses to atmospheric carbon dioxide in forests. In Carbon Forms and Functions in Forest Soils. Eds W W McFee and J M Kelly. pp. 397–418. Soil Science Society of America, Madison.Google Scholar
  26. Norby R J, Pastor J and Melillo J M 1986 Carbon-nitrogen interactions in CO2-enriched white oak: Physiological and long-term perspectives. Tree Physiol. 2, 233–241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Norby R J, Verbrugge M J, Hartz J S, Wullschleger S D, Gunderson C A, O'Neill E G and Edwards N T 1998 Increased temperature has both positive and negative influences on tree growth. In The Earth's Changing Land, GCTE-LUCC Open Science Conference on Global Change, Abstracts. p 24. Institut Cartografic de Catalunya, Barcelona.Google Scholar
  28. Norby R J, Wullschleger S D, Gunderson C A, Johnson D W and Ceulemans R 1999 Tree responses to rising CO2: Implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ., 22, 683–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Norby R J, Wullschleger S D, Gunderson C A and Nietch C T 1995 Increased growth efficiency of Quercus alba trees in a CO2-enriched atmosphere. New Phytol. 131, 91–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. O'Neill E G and Norby R J 1996 Litter quality and decomposition rates of foliar litter produced under CO2 enrichment. In Carbon Dioxide and Terrestrial Ecosystems. Eds G W Koch and H A Mooney. pp 87–103. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
  31. Pugnaire F I and Chapin F S III 1993 Controls over nutrient resorption from leaves of evergreen mediterranean species. Ecology 74, 124–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rastetter E B, McKane R B, Shaver G R and Melillo J M 1992 Changes in C storage by terrestrial ecosystems: How C-N interactions restrict responses to CO2 and temperature. Wat. Air Soil Pollut. 64, 327–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rogers H H, Heck W W and Heagle A S 1983 A field technique for the study of plant responses to elevated carbon dioxide concentrations. J. Air Pollut. Control Assoc. 33, 42–44.Google Scholar
  34. Saxe H, Ellsworth D S and Heath J 1998 Tansley review no. 98. Tree and forest functioning in an enriched CO2 atmosphere. New Phytol. 139, 395–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Strain B R and F A Bazzaz 1983 Terrestrial plant communities. In CO2 and Plants. Ed. E R Lemon. pp 177–222. Westview Press, Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  36. Williams R S, Lincoln D E and Norby R J 1998 Leaf age effects of elevated CO2-grown white oak leaves on spring-feeding lepidopterans. Glob. Change Biol. 4, 235–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Zak, D R, Pregitzer K S, Curtis P S, Teeri J A, Fogel R and Randlett D L 1993 Elevated atmospheric CO2 and feedback between carbon and nitrogen cycles in forested ecosystems. Plant Soil 151, 105–117.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard J. Norby
  • Tammy M. Long
  • Jennifer S. Hartz-Rubin
  • Elizabeth G. O'Neill

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations