Advertisement

Environmental Biology of Fishes

, Volume 57, Issue 2, pp 143–154 | Cite as

Reproductive Success Associated with Territoriality, Sneaking, and Grouping in Male Rose Bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus (Pisces: Cyprinidae)

  • Yoshihiko Kanoh
Article

Abstract

The spawning success of male rose bitterlings, Rhodeus ocellatus, adopting an alternative reproductive style, was estimated through behavioural data and electrophoretic paternal analyses in field observations and experiments. Three mating patterns were observed: territoriality, sneaking, and grouping. Mating patterns depended on a male's relative size and on local male density (the number of males around a spawning spot: a mussel). Spawning patterns (pair spawning, pair spawning with sneaker, and group spawning) varied with local male density. Time-budget data of the territorial males indicated a trade-off between chasing and courtship behaviour as local male density changed. Females deposited appoximately only 1 egg per egg-laying into the mussels. As a result of isozyme analysis, a minimum of 12% (two out of 17) of the offspring in the sample were found to have been fathered by sneaker males in pair spawning with sneaker. I scored through behavioural data the mating success per spawning for each pattern, on an individual basis. The average reproductive success per spawning for each pattern was: territorial (0.61), sneaking (0.31) and grouping (0.11), and thus the successes of the patterns were not equal. Accordingly, the alternative reproductive styles of male rose bitterlings are best interpreted as alternative phenotypes in a conditional behaviour.

alternative reproductive patterns isozyme electrophoresis pre-oviposition ejaculation group spawning 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References cited

  1. Borgia, G. 1980. Sexual competition in Scatophaga stercoraria: size-and density-related changes in male ability to capture females. Behaviour 75: 185-206.Google Scholar
  2. Brockman, H.J., T. Conlson & W. Potts. 1994. Sperm competition in horseshoe crabs (Limulus polyhemus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 35: 153-160.Google Scholar
  3. Chan, T.-Y. & A.J.R. Ribbink. 1990. Alternative reproductive behaviour in fishes with particular reference to Lepomis macrochira and Pseudocrenilaburs philander. Env. Biol. Fish. 28: 249-256.Google Scholar
  4. Crespi, B.J. 1988. Alternative male mating tactics in a thrips: effects of sex ratio variation and body size. Amer. Midl. Nat. 119: 83-92.Google Scholar
  5. De Boer, B.A. 1981. Influence of population density on the territorial, courting and spawning behaviour of male Chromis cyanea (Pomacentridae). Behaviour 77: 99-120.Google Scholar
  6. Eadie, J.M. & J.M. Fryxell. 1992. Density dependence, frequency dependence, and alternative nesting strategies in goldeneyes. Amer. Nat. 140: 621-641.Google Scholar
  7. Emlen, D.J. 1994. Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 256: 131-136.Google Scholar
  8. Gross, M.R. 1985. Disruptive selection for alternative life histories in salmon. Nature 313: 47-48.Google Scholar
  9. Gross, M.R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: diversity within sexes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 92-98.Google Scholar
  10. Hutchings, J.A. & R.A. Myers. 1988. Mating success of alternative maturation phenotypes in male Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar. Oecologia 75: 169-174.Google Scholar
  11. Kanoh, Y. 1996. Pre-oviposition ejaculation in externally fertilizing fish: how sneaker male bitterlings contrive to mate. Ethology 102: 883-899.Google Scholar
  12. Karino, K. & A. Nakazono. 1993. Reproductive behavior of the territorial herbivore Stegastes nigricans (Pisces: Pomacentridae) in relation to colony formation. J. Ethol. 11: 99-110.Google Scholar
  13. Kodric-Brown, A. 1988. Effects of sex-ratio manipulation on territoriality and spawning success of male pupfish, Cyprinodon pecosensis. Anim. Behav. 36: 1136-1144.Google Scholar
  14. Maekawa, K. & H. Onozato. 1986. Reproductive tactics and fertilization success of mature male Miyabe charr, Salvelinus malma miyabei. Env. Biol. Fish. 15: 119-129.Google Scholar
  15. Mori, S. 1993. The breeding system of the three-spined stickleback, Gasterosteus aculeatus (forma leiura) with reference to spatial and temporal patterns of nesting activity. Behaviour 126: 97-124.Google Scholar
  16. Nagata, Y. 1976. Reproductive behaviour of a bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus (Kner). Physiol. Ecol. Japan 17: 85-90 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  17. Nagata, Y. 1985. The effect of social organization of the bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus (Kner) and the condition of a bivalve, Anodonta woodiana Lea in a small pond on the number of fish eggs being laid in a bivalve. Mem. Osaka Kyoiku Univ., Ser. III 34: 9-26 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  18. Nagata, Y., T. Tetsukawa, T. Kobayashi & K. Numachi. 1996. Genetic markers distinguishing between the two subspecies of the rosy bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus (Cyprinidae). Japan. J. Ichthyol. 43: 117-124.Google Scholar
  19. Nakamura, M. 1969. Cyprinid fishes of Japan. Res. Inst. Nat. Resour. Spec. Publ. 4: 1-455 (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  20. Philipp, D.P. & M.R. Gross. 1994. Genetic evidence for cuckoldry in bluegill Lepomis macrochirus. Mol. Ecol. 3: 563-569.Google Scholar
  21. Radwan, J. 1993. The adaptive significance of male polymorphism in the acarid mite Caloglyhus berlesei. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 33: 201-208.Google Scholar
  22. Rico, C., U. Kuhnlein & G.J. FitzGerald. 1992. Male reproductive tactics in the threespine stickieback-an evaluation by DNA fingerprinting. Mol. Ecol. 1: 79-87.Google Scholar
  23. Ryan, M.J., C.M. Pease & M.R. Morris. 1992. A genetic polymorphism in the swordtail Xiphophorus nigrensis: testing the prediction of equal fitnesses. Amer. Nat. 139: 21-31.Google Scholar
  24. Shirai, K. 1962. Correlation between the growth of the ovipositor and ovarian condition in the bitterling, Rhodeus ocellatus. Bull. Fac. Fish. Hokkaido Univ. 13: 137-157.Google Scholar
  25. Shuster, S.M. & M.L. Wade. 1991. Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350: 608-610.Google Scholar
  26. Taborsky, M. 1994. Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasitic and cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Adv. Study Behav. 23: 1-100.Google Scholar
  27. Ueda, T. 1979. Plasticity of the reproductive behaviour in a dragonfly, Sympertrum parvulum, Bartenoff, with reference to the social relationship of males and the density of territories. Res. Popul. Ecol. 21: 135-152.Google Scholar
  28. Van Den Assem, J. 1967. Territory in the three-spined stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus), an experimental study in intraspecific competition. Behaviour, Suppl. 16: 1-164.Google Scholar
  29. Warner, R.R. & S.G. Hoffman. 1980. Population density and the economics of territorial defense in a coral reef fish. Ecology 61: 772-780.Google Scholar
  30. Warner, R.R. & P. Lejeune. 1985. Sex change limited by paternal care: a test using four Mediterranean labrid fishes, genus Symphodus. Mar. Biol. 87: 89-99.Google Scholar
  31. Warner, R.R., D.R. Robertson & E.G.J. Leigh. 1975. Sex change and sexual selection. Science 190: 633-638.Google Scholar
  32. Wiepkema, P.R. 1961. An ethological analysis of the reproductive behaviour of the bitterling (Rhodeus amarus Bloch). Arch. Neerl. Zool. 14: 103-199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yoshihiko Kanoh
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of BiologyOsaka Kyoiku UniversityOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations