Advertisement

Plant and Soil

, Volume 208, Issue 1, pp 95–102 | Cite as

Effect of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on net photosynthesis, growth, and activity of the enzymes nitrate reductase and glutamine synthetase in blueberry, raspberry and strawberry

  • W. Claussen
  • F. Lenz
Article

Abstract

Blueberry, raspberry and strawberry may have evolved strategies for survival due to the different soil conditions available in their natural environment. Since this might be reflected in their response to rhizosphere pH and N form supplied, investigations were carried out in order to compare effects of nitrate and ammonium nutrition (the latter at two different pH regimes) on growth, CO2 gas exchange, and on the activity of key enzymes of the nitrogen metabolism of these plant species. Highbush blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum L. cv. 13–16–A), raspberry (Rubus idaeus L. cv. Zeva II) and strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Senga Sengana) were grown in 10 L black polyethylene pots in quartz sand with and without 1% CaCO3 (w: v), respectively. Nutrient solutions supplied contained nitrate (6 mM) or ammonium (6 mM) as the sole nitrogen source. Compared with strawberries fed with nitrate nitrogen, supply of ammonium nitrogen caused a decrease in net photosynthesis and dry matter production when plants were grown in quartz sand without added CaCO3. In contrast, net photosynthesis and dry matter production increased in blueberries fed with ammonium nitrogen, while dry matter production of raspberries was not affected by the N form supplied. In quartz sand with CaCO3, ammonium nutrition caused less deleterious effects on strawberries, and net photosynthesis in raspberries increased as compared to plants grown in quartz sand without CaCO3 addition. Activity of nitrate reductase (NR) was low in blueberries and could only be detected in the roots of plants supplied with nitrate nitrogen. In contrast, NR activity was high in leaves, but low in roots of raspberry and strawberry plants. Ammonium nutrition caused a decrease in NR level in leaves. Activity of glutamine synthetase (GS) was high in leaves but lower in roots of blueberry, raspberry and strawberry plants. The GS level was not significantly affected by the nitrogen source supplied. The effects of nitrate or ammonium nitrogen on net photosynthesis, growth, and activity of enzymes in blueberry, raspberry and strawberry cultivars appear to reflect their different adaptability to soil pH and N form due to the conditions of their natural environment.

ammonium toxicity buffered nutrient solution Fragaria × ananassa Rubus idaeus Vaccinium corymbosum 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Arnold J T and Thompson L F 1982 Chlorosis in blueberries: Soilplant investigation. J. Plant Nutr. 5, 747–753.Google Scholar
  2. Barker A V and Mills H A 1980 Ammonium and nitrate nutrition of horticultural crops. Hort. Rev. 2, 395–423.Google Scholar
  3. Barker A V, Volk R J and Jackson W A 1966 Root environment acidity as a regulatory factor in ammonium assimilation by the bean plant. Plant Physiol. 41, 1193–1199.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Beevers L and Hageman R H 1969 Nitrate reduction in higher plants. Plant Physiol. 20, 495–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blackwell R D, Murray A J S and Lea P J 1987 Inhibition of photosynthesis in barley with decreased levels of chloroplastic glutamine synthetase activity. J. Exp. Bot. 38, 1799–1809.Google Scholar
  6. Blatt C R 1981 Effect of nitrogen source, rate and time of application on fruit yields of the micmac strawberry. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 12, 511–518.Google Scholar
  7. Block F R, Lenz F and Onkels R 1983 Einrichtungen zur Messung von Photosynthese, Respiration und Transpiration. Gartenbauwissenschaft 48, 128–134.Google Scholar
  8. Chaillou S, Vessey J K, Morot-Gaudry J F, Raper C D, Henry L T and Boutin J P 1991 Expression of characteristics of ammonium nutrition as affected by pH of the root medium. J. Exp. Bot. 42, 189–196.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Claussen W 1986 Influence of fruit load and environmental factors on nitrate reductase activity and concentration of nitrate and carbohydrates in leaves of eggplant (Solanum melongena). Physiol. Plant. 67, 73–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Claussen Wand Lenz F 1995 Effect of ammonium and nitrate on net photosynthesis, flower formation, growth and yield of eggplants (Solanum melongena L.). Plant Soil 171, 267–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Clay D E, Mahler R L and Menser H A 1984 The influence of N sources and rates on soil N parameters related to strawberry production in Northern Idaho. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 15, 819–832.Google Scholar
  12. Cummings G A 1978 Plant and soil effects of fertilizer and lime applied to highbush blueberries. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 103, 302–305.Google Scholar
  13. Cummings G, Bickford C and Nelson L 1971 Fertilizer and lime rates influence highbush blueberry growth and foliar elemental content during establishment. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 96, 184–186.Google Scholar
  14. Dirr M A, Barker A V and Maynard D N 1972 Nitrate reductase activity in the leaves of the highbush blueberry and other plants. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97, 329–331.Google Scholar
  15. Ebbinghaus D and Lenz F 1991 Einsatz der Ammonium-Depotdüngung im Erdbeeranbau. Erwerbsobstbau 33, 100–104.Google Scholar
  16. Eck P 1977 Nitrogen requirement of the highbush blueberry, Vaccinium corymbosum L. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 102, 816–818.Google Scholar
  17. Errebhi M and Wilcox G E 1990 Plant species response to ammonium-nitrate concentration ratios. J. Plant Nutr. 13, 1017–1029.Google Scholar
  18. Findenegg G R 1987 A comparative study of ammonium toxicity at different constant pH of the nutrient solution. Plant Soil 103. 239–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Forde B G and Woodall J 1995 Glutamine synthetase in higher plants: molecular biology meets plant physiology. In Amino Acids and Their Derivatives in Higher Plants. Ed. R M Wallsgrove. pp 1–18. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York, Melbourne.Google Scholar
  20. Frantz T A, Peterson D M and Durbin R D 1982 Sources of ammonium in oat leaves treated with tabtoxin or methionine sulfoximine. Plant Physiol. 69, 345–348.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Gerendás J, Ratcliffe R G and Sattelmacher B 1995 The influence of nitrogen and potassium supply on ammonium content of maize (Zea mays L.) leaves including a comparison of measurements made in vivo and in vitro. Plant Soil 173, 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gerendás J, Zhu Z, Bendixen R and Sattelmacher B 1997 Physiological and biochemical processes related to ammonium toxicity in higher plants. Z. Pflanzenernähr. Bodenk. 160, 239–251.Google Scholar
  23. Givan C V 1979 Metabolic detoxification of ammonia in tissues of higher plants. Phytochem. 18, 375–382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Goulart B L, Demchak K and Yang W Q 1995 Organic matter and nitrogen level effects on mycorrhizal infection in 0 Bluecrop0 highbush blueberry plants. J. Small Fruit & Viticulture 3, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Greidanus T, Peterson L A, Schrader L E and Dana M N 1972 Essentiality of ammonium for cranberry nutrition.J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 97, 272–277.Google Scholar
  26. Havill D C, Lee J A and Stewart G R 1974 Nitrate utilization by species from acidic and calcareous soils. New Phytol. 73, 1221–1231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hondelmann W H J 1976 Erdbeerzüchtung: Probleme, Methoden, Ergebnisse. Fortschritte der Pflanzenzüchtung. In Beihefte zur "Zeitschrift für Pflanzenzüchtung" 7. Eds. W Horn, H Kuckuck and H Stubbe. pp 1–76. Paul Parey, Berlin, Hamburg.Google Scholar
  28. Kafkafi U and Ganmore-Neumann R 1997 Ammonium in plant tissue: Real or artifact? J. Plant Nutr. 20, 107–118.Google Scholar
  29. Kendall A C, Wallsgrove RM, Hall N P, Turner J C and Lea P J 1986 Carbon and nitrogen metabolism in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) mutants lacking ferredoxin-dependent glutamate synthase. Planta 168, 316–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kinzel H 1983 Influence of limestone, silicates and soil pH on vegetation. In Physiological Plant Ecology III. Responses to the Chemical and Biological Environment. Eds. O L Lange, P S Nobel, C B Osmond and H Ziegler. pp 201–243. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  31. Korcak R F 1986a Adaptability of blueberry species to various soil types: I. Growth and initial fruiting. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111, 816–821.Google Scholar
  32. Korcak R F 1986b Adaptability of blueberry species to various soil types: II. Leaf and soil analysis. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 111, 822–828.Google Scholar
  33. Korcak R F 1987 Iron deficiency chlorosis. Hort. Rev. 9, 133–186.Google Scholar
  34. Korcak R F 1988 Nutrition of blueberry and other calcifuges. Hort. Rev. 10, 183–227.Google Scholar
  35. Korcak R F 1989 Variation in nutrient requirements of blueberries and other calcifuges. Hort. Sci. 24, 573–578.Google Scholar
  36. Krogmann D W, Jagendorf A T and Avron M 1959 Uncouplers of spinach chloroplast photosynthetic phosphorylation. Plant Physiol. 34, 272–277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Krüger E 1983 Mineralstoffbedarf von Preiselbeeren (Vaccinium vitis idaea L. 'Koralle') und Stickstoffversorgung von Kulturheidelbeeren (Vaccinium corymbosum L. 'Berkeley'). Diss. Univ. Hannover FB Gartenbau.Google Scholar
  38. Lea P J and Miflin B J 1974 Alternative route for nitrogen assimilation in higher plants. Nature 251, 614–616.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lee J A and Stewart G R 1978 Ecological aspects of nitrogen assimilation. Adv. Bot. Res. 6, 1–43.Google Scholar
  40. Lewis O A M, Kaiser J J and Probyn T A 1979 A comparison of nitrogen assimilation pathways in nitrophilous and nonnitrophilous plants. In Nitrogen Assimilation of Plants. Eds. E J Hewitt and C V Cutting. pp 435–440. Academic Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
  41. Lips S H, Leidi E O, Silberbush M, Soores M I M and Lewis E M 1990 Physiological aspects of ammonium and nitrate fertilization. J. Plant Nutr. 13, 1271–1289.Google Scholar
  42. Magalhaes J R and Wilcox G F 1983 Tomato growth and nutrient uptake patterns as influenced by nitrogen form and light intensity. J. Plant Nutr. 6, 941–956.Google Scholar
  43. Marschner H 1995 Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, New York.Google Scholar
  44. Maynard D N and Barker A V 1969 Studies on the tolerance of plants to ammonium nutrition. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 94, 235–239.Google Scholar
  45. Mengel K 1994 Iron availability in plant tissues iron chlorosis on calcareous soils. Plant Soil 165, 275–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mengel K, Robin P and Salsac L 1983 Nitrate reductase activity in shoots and roots of maize seedlings as affected by the form of nitrogen nutrition and pH of the nutrient solution. Plant Physiol. 71, 618–622.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Merhaut D J and Darnell R L 1995 Ammonium and nitrate accumulation in containerized southern highbush blueberry plants. Hort. Sci. 30, 1378–1381.Google Scholar
  48. Merhaut D J and Darnell R L 1996 Vegetative growth and nitrogen/ carbon partitioning in blueberry as influenced by nitrogen fertilization. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 121, 875–879.Google Scholar
  49. Pate J S 1980 Transport and partitioning of nitrogenous solutes. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 31, 313–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pick U, Zeelon O and Weiss M 1991 Amine accumulation in acidic vacuoles protects the halotolerant alga Dunaliella salina against alkaline stress. Plant Physiol. 97, 1226–1233.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. Puritch G S and Barker A V 1967 Structure and function of tomato leaf chloroplasts during ammonium toxicity. Plant Physiol. 42, 1229–1238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Raab T K and Terry N 1994 Nitrogen source regulation of growth and photosynthesis in Beta vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 105, 1159–1166.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Raab T K and Terry N 1995 Carbon, nitrogen, and nutrient interactions in Beta vulgaris L. as influenced by nitrogen source, NO3 - versus NH4C. Plant Physiol. 107, 575–584.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Runge M 1983 Physiology and ecology of nitrogen nutrition. In Physiological Plant Ecology III. Response to the Chemical and Biological Environment. Eds. O L Lange, P S Nobel, C B Osmond and H Ziegler. pp 163–200. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  55. Sahulka J 1977 The effect of some ammonium salts on nitrate reductase level, on in vivo nitrate reduction and on nitrate content in excised Pisum sativum roots. Biol. Plant. 19, 113–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Stewart G R, Sumar N and Patel M 1987 Comparative aspects of inorganic nitrogen assimilation in higher plants. In Inorganic Nitrogen Metabolism. Eds. W R Ullrich, P J Aparicio, P J Syrett and F Castillo. pp 39–44. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.Google Scholar
  57. Takács E and Técsi L 1992 Effects of NO3 -/NH4C ratio on photosynthetic rates, nitrate reductase activity and chloroplast ultrastructure in three cultivars of red pepper (Capsicum annuum L.). J. Plant Physiol. 140, 298–305.Google Scholar
  58. Takamizo T and Sugiyama N 1991 Growth-responses to N-forms in rabbiteye and highbush blueberries. J. Jap. Soc. Hort. Sci. 60, 41–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Timpo E and Neyra C A 1983 Expression of nitrate and nitrite reductase activities under various forms of nitrogen nutrition inPhaseolus vulgaris L. Plant Physiol. 72, 71–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Townsend L R 1967 Effect of ammonium nitrogen and nitrate nitrogen, separately and in combination, on the growth of the highbush blueberry. Can. J. Plant Sci. 47, 555–562.Google Scholar
  61. Townsend L R 1973 Effects of N, P, K, and Mg on the growth and productivity of the highbush blueberry. Can. J. Plant Sci. 53, 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Truax B, Gagnon D, Lambert F and Chevrier N 1994 Nitrate assimilation of raspberry and pin cherry in a recent clearcut. Can. J. Bot. 72, 1343–1348.Google Scholar
  63. Walker K A, Keys A J and Givan C V 1984 Effect of methionine sulphoximine on the products of photosynthesis in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 35, 1800–1810.Google Scholar
  64. Wang S Y and Korcak R F 1995 Blueberry nitrate reductase activity: Effect of nutrient ions and cytokinins. J. Small Fruit & Viticulture 3, 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Claussen
    • 1
    • 2
  • F. Lenz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Institut für Gemüse- und Zierpflanzenbau Großbeeren/Erfurt e.V.GroßbeerenGermany and
  2. 2.Instiut für Obst- und Gemüsebau der Universität BonnBonnGermany E-mail

Personalised recommendations