Advertisement

Journal of Materials Science

, Volume 33, Issue 19, pp 4787–4790 | Cite as

Two types of graphoepitaxy of tellurium onto uniaxially-oriented polyethylene

  • F. Katzenberg
  • I. Lieberwirth
  • J. Petermann
Article

Abstract

The growth of vapour-deposited tellurium on uniaxially oriented polyethylene substrates of various crystallinity is examined. Two orientations of the tellurium appear, depending apparently on the crystallinity of the respective substrate. That these individual orientations are of various origins is concluded from our investigations. On totally amorphous films, obtained after electron irradiation of the substrate films, only one preferred orientation of the Te remains in accordance with our model, which is presented to explain the mechanisms of the respective orientations of tellurium onto polyethylene.

Keywords

Polymer Polyethylene Prefer Orientation Tellurium Individual Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Petermann and G. Broza, J. Mater. Sci. 22 (1987) S.1108.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    J. M. Schultz and S. K. Peneva, APS-meeting, Las Vegas, Bulletin (1986) S.511.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    J. M. Schultz and S. K. Peneva, J. Polymer Phys. B, Polymer Phys. 25 (1987) S.185.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. I. Smith and D. C. Flanders, Appl. Phys. Letters 32 (1978) S.349.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D. C. Flanders, H. I. Smith and M. W. Geis, Appl. Phys. Letters 35 (1979) S.71.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    N. N. Sheftal and A. N. Bouzynin, Vest. Mosk. Univ, Geol. 3 (1972) S.102.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Royer, Bull. Soc. Fr. Cristallogr. 51 (1928) S.7.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    L. Royer, Bull. Soc. Fr. Cristallogr. 77 (1954) S.1004.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    T. Osaka, Y. Kasukabe and H. Nakamura, J. Cryst. Growth 69 (1984) S.149.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Y. Kasukabe and T. Osaka, Thin Solid Films 146 (1987) S.175.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    L. S. Darken, J. Electrochem. Soc., Electrochem. Sci. Tech. 6 (1983) S.1274.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    T. Osaka and Y. Kasukabe, J. Cryst. Growth 73 (1985) S.10.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    K. D. Jandt, M. Buhk and J. Petermann, J. Mater. Sci., 31 (1996) S.1779.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    J. Petermann and R. M. Gohil, J. Mater. Sci. 14 (1979) S.2260.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Hippel, J. Chem. Phys. 16 (1948) S.372.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    M. J. Caspers and M. White, Thin Solid Films 8 (1971) S.353.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Y. Saito and M. Shiojiri, Jap. J. Appl. Phys. 19 (1980) S.427.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    E. J. Weidmann and J. C. Anderson, Thin Solid Films 7 (1971) S.265.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    R. Janlewing, F. Katzenberg and J. Petermann, submitted.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Kluwer Academic Publishers 1998

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Katzenberg
    • 1
  • I. Lieberwirth
    • 1
  • J. Petermann
    • 1
  1. 1.Lehrstuhl für Werkstoffkunde, FB Chemietechnik,Universität Dortmund,Dortmund,Germany

Personalised recommendations