Automated image analyses for separating plant roots from soil debris elutrated from soil cores
- 117 Downloads
Historically, destructive root sampling has been labor intensive and requires manual separation of extraneous organic debris recovered along with the hydropneumatic elutriation method of separating plant roots from soils. Quantification of root system demographics by public domain National Institute of Health (NIH-Image) and Root Image Processing Laboratory (RIPL) image processing algorithms has eliminated much of the labor-intensive manual separation. This was accomplished by determining the best length to diameter ratio for each object during image analyses. Objects with a length to diameter ratio less than a given threshold are considered non-root materials and are rejected automatically by computer algorithms. Iterative analyses of length to diameter ratios showed that a 15:1 ratio was best for separating images of maize (Zea mays L.) roots from associated organic debris. Using this threshold ratio for a set of 24 soil cores, a highly significant correlation (r2 = 0.89) was obtained between computer image processed total root length per core and actual root length. A linear relationship (r2 = 0.80) was observed between root lengths determined by NIH-Image analyses and lengths determined independently by the RIPL imaging system, using the same maize root + debris samples. This correlation demonstrates that computer image processing provides opportunities for comparing root length parameters between different laboratories for samples containing debris.
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Box J E 1996 Modern methods for root investigations. In Plant Roots: The Hidden Half. Eds. Y Waisel et al. pp 193-237. Marcel Dekker, New York.Google Scholar
- Dowdy R H, Nater E A and Dolan M S 1995 Quantification of the length and diameter of root segments with public domain software. Commun. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 26, 459-468.Google Scholar
- Kucke M, Schmid H and Spiess A 1995 A comparison of four methods for measuring roots of field crops in three contrasting soils. Plant Soil 172, 63-71.Google Scholar
- Majdi H, Smucker A J M and Persson H 1992 A comparison between minirhizotron and monolith sampling methods for measuring root growth of maize (Zea mays L.). Plant Soil 147, 127-134.Google Scholar
- Newman E I 1966 A method for estimating total length of root in a sample. J. Appl. Ecol. 3, 139-145.Google Scholar
- Rasband W 1991 Image Processing and Analysis User's Guide. National Institutes of Health, Research Services Branch, NIH, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
- Smit A L and Groenwold J 1992 The use of three-dimensional-high-resolution scanner to determine root length. In Root Ecology and its Practical Application. Eds. L Kutschera et al. pp 771-772. Verein fur Wurzelforschung, A-9020, Klagenfurt, Austria.Google Scholar
- Smucker A J M 1990 Quantification of roots dynamics in agroecological systems. Remote Sensing Rev. 5, 237-248.Google Scholar
- Smucker A J M, Ferguson J C, DeBruyn W P, Belford R K and Ritchie J T 1987 Image analysis of video-recorded root systems. In Minirhizotron Observation Tubes: Methods and Applications for Measuring Root Dynamics. Ed. HM Taylor. pp 67-80. ASA Special Publ. No 50, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
- Smucker A J M, McBurney S L and Srivastava A K 1982 Quantitative separation of roots from compacted soil profiles by the hydropneumatic elutriation system. Agron. J. 74, 500-503.Google Scholar